This is only a preview of the June 2026 issue of Practical Electronics. You can view 0 of the 80 pages in the full issue. Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Items relevant to "SSB Shortwave Receiver, part two":
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
|
Constructional Project
Tim Blythman’s
433MHz
Digital Receiver Module
We recently published our version of the ubiquitous 433.9MHz LPD433 transmitter module, which
performs better than many prebuilt versions. Having found a suitable receiver IC, we then created
our own version of a matching receiver module, and it is better too!
W
e wrote about our 433MHz
Transmitter Module in the
May issue. That article discussed
the LPD433 (Low Interference Potential Devices) RF band, which covers
433.05MHz to 434.79MHz and can
be used without a paid licence.
There are some simple provisions,
including that the EIRP (equivalent
isotropically radiated power) must
not exceed 10mW. This is of concern
for a transmitter, and we explained
how our Transmitter Module was
compliant. Of course, this should
not be a problem with a receiver, so
we don’t need to worry about that
aspect for this project.
These sorts of receivers and transmitters are typically used to send
digital data at a low bit-rate (up to
around 10kbit/s) to provide a wireless link over distances up to 100m,
such as around a home.
Typical applications include
remote control of devices like garage
doors and gates, or for sending data
from remote sensors back to a base
unit, as might be found in a wireless weather station.
Fig.1 shows a block diagram of
such a system. As we mentioned in
the earlier article, multiple layers
of encoding are often used to make
the best use of the medium and to
allow systems to coexist with others
nearby by providing identity and
data validation (checksum) features.
We noted how the receivers use
AGC (automatic gain control) to receive data at differing signal strengths.
Simple OOK (on-off keying) means
that it is quite straightforward to extract a digital signal from the ambient background RF noise.
Effectively, the receiver keeps track
68
of the average RF signal strength (over
millisecond time scales). If the instantaneous RF signal is stronger than
the average, a logical high is sent to
the data output, while a low output
is when the RF signal is weaker than
average. (That explains why you get
noise from the output when there’s
no RF signal; atmospheric noise on
that frequency will constantly vary
above and below its average.)
We’ve used these sorts of transmitters and receivers in numerous projects. The most recent was the Battery Powered Model Train from the
December 2025 issue. John Clarke
even designed a 433MHz Wireless
Data Range Extender, which was
published in the January 2023 issue.
433MHz receiver
Our earlier 433MHz Transmitter
Module is a drop-in replacement for
many commercial transmitter modules. It has the same pinout, general size and shape as those modules.
The Transmitter Module article has
comparative performance tests between our unit and a commercial
equivalent.
This Receiver Module is intended to be a substitute for the corre-
sponding receivers. If you compare
the photos above and below, you can
see that we have aimed for the same
pinout and size, but you’ll note that
our unit has an extra pin (for RSSI,
a useful extra feature).
The Transmitter Module uses a
Microchip MICRF113 IC and the Receiver Module uses a MICRF220 IC.
These are both intended for use in
these sorts of applications on LIPD
bands, which makes our design task
easier.
The MICRF220 IC
One of the quirks of these receiver modules is that when there is no
nearby transmission, the DATA pin
will produce a stream of random
data. This is analogous to an AM
radio (for those that remember radios
before they became digital!) playing
static when tuned between stations.
This can be a source of frustration
for those using these modules for the
first time, since the decoder (typically the right-hand microcontroller in
Fig.1) must be able to separate this
background noise from valid data.
One simple strategy is to look for
signal transitions occurring more
frequently than anticipated for the
Fig.1: a matching transmitter and receiver pair form a one-way wireless link
to transmit small quantities of digital data. A previous article covered the
construction of a transmitter module.
Practical Electronics | June | 2026
433MHz Receiver Module
Features & Specifications
» Drop-in replacement for many 433MHz
receiver modules
» Operates from 3.3-5V
» Optional RSSI output (analog voltage, 0.5-2V)
» 6mA nominal operating current
» Optional squelch feature, configurable by
resistors
» Faster rise and fall times, less latency than
some prebuilt receiver modules
» Sensitivity with onboard antenna is superior
to other modules with an external wire
antenna
» Short AGC settling time
Fig.2: our circuit is based on the
MICRF220 RF chip for receiving digital
data on the 433MHz band. It requires a
3.3V supply, provided by REG1. As well as
receiving data, it provides an RSSI signal
so the controller can determine whether
an RF transmission is occurring and how
strong the signal is.
expected data stream; the presence
of high frequency components is typical of the white noise that occurs
with no signal. So, when frequent
transitions are seen, the data can
be ignored.
The data sheet for the MICRF220
describes it as a “300MHz to 450MHz
3.3V ASK/OOK Receiver with RSSI
and Squelch”. Squelch is a handy
feature on radio receivers that can
suppress the output unless a strong
enough signal is received.
To maintain compatibility with
the older modules, our Receiver
Module can be built with or without
the squelch feature. It is enabled by
simply fitting a single resistor. We
made this optional, since some designs may depend on the noise to
detect a valid signal.
RSSI stands for ‘received signal
strength indicator’, and it is exactly what it sounds like. There is
an RSSI pin on the MICRF220 that
produces an analog voltage related
to the received signal strength. The
data sheet gives figures of 0.5V for
a -110dBm RF input level and 2.0V
for -50dBm. This is the extra pin on
our design.
Note that the theoretical frequency
range of the MICRF220 extends well
beyond the 433/434MHz band. The
components we have selected are
intended to optimise the operation
for this band; different values are
needed for the likes of the 315MHz
band, which sees similar use in the
USA. The MICRF220 data sheet discusses this in more detail.
Circuit details
Fig.2 shows the circuit diagram of
our Receiver Module. Power comes
in through the various GND and Vcc
pins on CON1 and CON2. These are
chosen to match the pinouts of other
receiver modules, so a few are duplicated.
The MICRF220 is a 3.3V device, so
we have provided a 3.3V regulator
Our Receiver Module (shown in the lead photos) is the same size as boards like
the commercial module shown here, but has a couple of extra features. The
extra RSSI pin produces a voltage related to the received signal strength. It also
has an optional onboard PCB trace antenna. These photographs are shown at
125% scale for clarity.
Practical Electronics | June | 2026
to allow operation with a 5V supply.
REG1, an MCP1700, can tolerate up
to 6V on its input. The two 1μF capacitors are recommended input and
output bypassing capacitors.
The remainder of the circuit is
centred on IC1, the MICRF220 receiver IC. Pin 8 (SHDN) is tied low
with a 100kW resistor to enable the
chip whenever it is powered. Capacitor C10 is an optional part noted in
the data sheet. When fitted, it will
assert the shutdown state momentarily while the chip is powered on. We
didn’t find it was necessary to fit it.
Power from the regulator comes
into pins 5 (power) and 9 (ground)
of IC1, with a 100nF capacitor providing further bypassing. The circuit
around the two inductors at lower
left is the recommended matching
network for the RF signal going into
pin 3 of IC1 from the external antenna (‘ANT’) connection. Adjacent
pins 2 and 4 are RF ground.
We were able to comfortably fit
all the required parts in the necessary PCB area, with room to spare,
so we added a PCB trace antenna. It
can be connected by closing jumper
JP1 with a solder blob or 0W resistor.
The antenna is about 16cm long,
suitable for use at 433/434MHz.
Adding the length of the other connected traces, it is very close to the
nominal 173mm needed for a quarter-
wave antenna at 433MHz. Otherwise,
an external antenna can be connected
via the module’s ANT pin.
69
Constructional Project
Scope 1: the current consumption of our module, measured with a low-side
100W shunt resistor, is very close to the 6mA noted on the data sheet. It rises
slightly when the data output is high.
Scope 2: the commercial module that we tested only drew 3mA during
operation, although its data sheet indicates a maximum of 10mA.
Scope 3: the blue trace is a signal applied to a transmitter module, while the
green trace is the DATA output from our Receiver Module. The red trace is the
output from a prebuilt module. Our module is clearly quicker to respond, with
sharper edges.
70
Pins 1 and 16 of IC1 connect to a
13.52313MHz crystal and its loading capacitors. Like the Transmitter
Module, this circuit uses a ×32 PLL
(phase-locked loop) to generate a reference frequency.
You might notice that the crystal
for the Receiver Module is a different
frequency to that on the Transmitter
Module (13.56MHz).
That is because the MICRF220
uses an IF (intermediate frequency)
demodulator. The PLL frequency is
mixed with the incoming RF signal
to produce a signal with a frequency about 1MHz lower. This lower-
frequency signal is easier for the IC
to extract the data from.
Pins 7 and 11 (SEL0 and SEL1)
select the demodulator bandwidth.
We have chosen the 13kHz low-pass
filter setting by leaving both of these
pins to be pulled high by their internal current sources. Fitting a 10kW
resistor for either or both of R1 and
R2 will change this setting.
Pin 13 of IC1 (CAGC) is connected
to a 470nF capacitor; this value is also
dictated by the data sheet and the
bandwidth setting described above.
The level on this pin sets the gain
of the internal amplifier; it is part of
the AGC control loop. This capacitor
value ensures that the AGC responds
at the correct rate to allow the data
of interest to be received.
The RSSI signal from pin 14 is internally derived from the CAGC signal
by being inverted and buffered. It is
fed to the extra pin on CON1 via a
1kW resistor. This protects the chip
from potential short circuits.
The capacitor on the pin 12 (CTH)
provides bypassing of an internal reference voltage that is used by a comparator to generate the output on pin
10 (DO). Like RSSI, the DO output is
protected by a 1kW series resistor between it and the external DATA pin.
Pin 6 (SQ) enables the squelch
feature. When left open, an internal pullup current disables squelch.
Fitting R5 will pull the pin low and
enable squelch. For any of pins 6, 7
or 11, the pullup is around 5μA, so
a resistor of 10kW or lower will be
more than sufficient to overcome
the pullup.
Operation
The MICRF220 uses around 6mA
when configured for 433MHz operation. At this level, the dropout voltage
Practical Electronics | June | 2026
433MHz Receiver Module
of the regulator is less than 100mV,
so it will not have much effect on
the output voltage, even if a 3.3V
supply is used.
Most 5V microcontrollers we have
seen will happily accept 3.3V logic
levels, and the MICRF220 works down
to a 3.0V supply voltage, so this Receiver Module will be suitable for 5V
and 3.3V systems.
If you are considering changing the
SEL0 and SEL1 settings by adding
resistors R1 and/or R2, you should
check the MICRF220 data sheet closely as some other parts may need to
change values. You shouldn’t need
to do this, as the default bandwidth
settings should work fine with lower
data rates.
Comparisons
We thought it was important to describe the operation of our Receiver
Module and the MICRF220 because
it has quite an impact on the performance of the Module compared with
other receiver modules. We compared our Receiver Module (using
its onboard antenna) to a commercial
module with a simple wire antenna.
We used our previously described
433MHz Transmitter Module as the
RF source for the tests. Our first test
was to confirm the operating current of the modules. The MICRF220
data sheet notes a typical current of
6mA; the MCP1700 has a quiescent
current of 1.6μA, so it does not contribute significantly to the Receiver
Module’s consumption.
We rigged up a 5V supply and a
100W resistor as a low-side current
measuring shunt on a breadboard. The
breadboard allowed us to change between the two modules without otherwise altering the circuit.
Our Receiver came in right on 6mA,
as seen in Scope 1. You can see that the
current does come up slightly when the
output pin is high; it reaches 6.1mA.
The prebuilt module measured just
under 3mA, whether its output was
high or not (Scope 2). Interestingly, its
data sheet notes a 10mA maximum, so
there may be more variability amongst
these modules.
between the input and output. The
output of our Receiver Module is not
only faster (24μs vs 28μs on rising
edges and 24μs vs 34μs on falling
edges), but more symmetrical and it
also has sharper edges.
We monitored the output of both
receivers when a 1kHz square wave
was applied to the transmitter’s DATA
input.
Scope 3 shows the falling edge of
a pulse on the DATA input, with the
two receivers responses following.
We also performed some tests to see
how the receivers would respond to
different OOK modulation frequencies. As we changed the frequency at
the DATA input of the transmitter, we
watched the receiver outputs to see
how well they followed the input.
Above 10kHz, the output is 90° or
more behind the input for both receivers, as seen in Scope 4. You’ll
see that our Receiver is still delivering a signal that is closer in time to
the original signal than the prebuilt
module. Both receivers are receiving a solid signal at this frequency.
Sensitivity
You might recall from our article
on the Transmitter Module that its
output power can be set by altering
a single resistor value. This allows
us to easily produce weak signals to
compare the sensitivity of the two
receivers.
We performed some tests to compare the relative sensitivity of the receivers. With the two receivers sideby-side on the same breadboard, we
monitored how they responded to a
transmitter on the other side of our
laboratory; this was an Arduino connected to one of our Transmitters to
output a typical encoded waveform.
The first test was with the Transmitter at full power, and Scope 5
shows an interesting result. Here,
we see how quickly the receivers
‘lock on’ to the signal. Our Receiver
Module settles its AGC at the correct
Scope 4: at 10kHz, a higher frequency than used for Scope 3, you can see the
difference in latency between the two modules. This is quite a bit higher in
frequency than most 433MHz transmissions we have seen, with 1kHz being
more typical.
Latency and bandwidth
For the next few tests, we rigged up
the two receivers side-by-side on a
breadboard, allowing them to be seen
responding to the same transmissions.
This shows us the latency, or delay,
Practical Electronics | June | 2026
Scope 5: the blue trace here is our Receiver’s RSSI pin, while the green trace is
its DATA output; the red trace is from a commercial, prebuilt module. You can
see how much more quickly our Receiver locks on to the incoming signal and
starts producing valid data.
71
Constructional Project
Parts List – 433MHz Reciever Module
1 double-sided PCB coded 15103252, 11.5 × 43mm
1 5-way right-angle pin header (CON1)
1 4-way right-angle pin header (CON2)
1 13.52313MHz two-pin SMD crystal, 5.0 × 3.2mm (X1)
[Abracon ABM3-13.52313MHZ-10-B4Y-T]
1 39nH inductor, M1608/0603 size (L1) [Murata LQG18HN39NJ00]
1 33nH inductor M1608/0603 size (L2) [Murata LQG18HN33NJ00]
Semiconductors
1 MICRF220AY 300-450MHz ASK receiver IC, QSOP-16 (IC1)
1 MCP1700-3302 3.3V LDO linear voltage regulator, SOT-23 (REG1)
Capacitors (all M2012/0805 size, X7R 50V ceramic unless noted)
2 1μF
SC7447 Kit from Silicon Chip in
1 470nF
Australia (~£12.50 + postage):
2 100nF
includes all the parts listed here
2 10pF NP0/C0G
2 1.5pF NP0/C0G
Resistors
(all M2012/0805 size, ⅛W 1%)
1 100kW
2 1kW
Extra resistors for option
selections
3 10kW M2012/0805 ⅛W
1 0W M1608/0603
OR bridge JP1 with solder
Scope 6: using the same trace colours as Scope 5, we see the two modules
responding to a weaker signal. The RSSI is lower, and the prebuilt module is
producing glitches that are not seen in our Receiver’s output.
level a full 15ms before the commercial module; you can still see glitches
in the latter’s output for this time. The
blue trace that we have used as a trigger is the RSSI output of our Receiver.
Then we used a 1kW resistor to
set the output power to 12dB below
nominal. Scope 6 is the result of this.
The RSSI trace sits at around 1.4V or
-74dBm, and our Receiver has picked
out clean data, while the prebuilt
module is seeing some data but is delivering glitches too. At lower levels
than this, we could not see any data
on either receiver.
This is useful information in that
we now know that a level of around
1.4V indicates sufficient RSSI to receive a valid signal. Remember that
these tests were done with the Receiver’s onboard antenna; an external antenna should give even better results.
While running these tests, we also
used a software-defined radio receiver
to monitor the relative RSSI. It indicated that these active transmissions
were only about 10dB above the background RF level.
Squelch
We also ran some tests to try out the
squelch feature. For these, we simply
shorted out the R5 pads on the PCB to
pull IC1’s pin 6 low. The data sheet
notes the chip will “monitor incoming pulse width before allowing activity on DO pin.”
So it doesn’t appear that RSSI is
used to control the squelch. Scope
7 shows a typical waveform with
squelch active. You can see that there
is still activity on the DATA line even
when the RSSI is low.
It appears that this is where the
13kHz filter is used, as signals at
a higher frequency are cut off and
do not appear on the output. So the
squelch is helpful, but does not completely remove the need to filter out
unwanted activity on the DATA pin.
Construction
Scope 7: even with Squelch enabled, our Receiver still produces the occasional
spurious pulse on the DATA line when the RSSI is low. So you shouldn’t expect
the Squelch to completely eliminate the need to reject noise on the DATA line,
but it helps to reduce it quite a bit.
72
The 433MHz Receiver Module uses
some small SMD parts, although nothing that can’t be hand-soldered with a
little patience. IC1 comes in a 16-pin
QSOP (quarter-size small-outline package) with a 0.635mm pin pitch, and
the regulator is a SOT-23 part. Most
of the passives are M2012 (0805) size
at 2.0 × 1.0mm, although the two inductors are M1608 (0603) size or 1.6
× 0.8mm.
Practical Electronics | June | 2026
433MHz Receiver Module
We’ve used M2012-sized pads for
the passives throughout to ease construction. Where possible, we have
lengthened the pads on the PCB to
make it easier to apply solder. This
also gives a bit more room between
the components.
So you’ll need the standard surface-
mounting gear; a fine-tipped soldering iron and some flux paste are the
bare minimum. You should also have
tweezers, a magnifier, solder-wicking
braid and some good illumination.
Your flux will probably also require
a solvent for cleanup, although we
find that isopropyl alcohol is a good
generic option.
The Receiver Module is built on
a double-sided PCB that’s coded
15103252 and measures 11.5 × 43mm.
Figs.3 & 4 are the overlay diagrams
that show where the parts are placed.
You can also refer to the adjacent
photos during construction.
All the mandatory components are
on one side of the PCB, as shown in
Fig.3. Apply flux paste to the pads for
all the components on that side. Start
by placing the IC over its pads on the
PCB, noting the orientation of the pin
1 marker; our chip had a moulded
divot, which was easy to find.
Clean the iron’s tip and apply a
little fresh solder. Tack one lead and
check that the other pins are lined up
on both sides. If so, carefully solder
the remaining pins, cleaning the tip
and adding extra solder as needed.
Otherwise, use the iron to melt the
solder and tweak the chip with tweezers until it is located correctly.
If you end up with a solder bridge
joining two or more pins, add extra
flux paste and press the braid against
the bridge with the iron, then gently
draw both away once the excess solder
is drawn up into the braid.
Next, fit REG1, the SOT-23 regulator. It should only fit one way, with
its leads down flat on the PCB, so
place it, tack one lead and check
the position. If all is well, solder the
other two pins. If any joins don’t look
great, add some extra flux and touch
the iron to the pad and pin to refresh
the solder.
The two inductors at bottom left
should be fitted next as they are the
smallest remaining parts. We’ve seen
some SMD inductors that only have
pads on the underside, which makes
them a little more tricky to solder.
Don’t forget that most SMD parts are
Practical Electronics | June | 2026
Figs.3 & 4: to use
the onboard PCB
trace antenna,
close JP1 with
a blob of solder
or 0W resistor.
The rear of the
PCB shows the
functions of the
external pins.
If you wish
to enable the
squelch function,
you can fit a
10kW resistor
for R5. These
diagrams are at
200% scale.
usually designed to be soldered by
a machine!
You might be able to make out a
black mark on one end of the inductors. We’ve fitted our prototypes with
the band to the left and on the top,
which you can see in the photos. We
don’t think it will make any difference, but we recommend you do the
same. RF can be strange and we don’t
want to tempt the fates!
Use the same technique of soldering one lead then the other once the
location has been correctly fixed. You
can check that the inductors are connected to their pads by doing a continuity test; they should read well
under 10W.
For the 33nH part, you can probe
between the ANT and GND pads of
CON2. For the 39nH inductor, probe
between ground and the right-hand
pad of the 1.5pF capacitor directly
above the inductor. If either inductor
reads high resistance, add more flux
and try soldering each lead again.
Solder the crystal (X1) next. It
probably will have leads only on its
underside, but the PCB pads are generously sized, so they will be easy to
press the soldering iron against. As
long as there’s flux paste on the pads
when you place the crystal, solder
should flow between the pads and
crystal. Unfortunately, you can’t
check a crystal for continuity as you
can with an inductor.
The remaining mandatory small
parts are all M2012 (0805) passives,
and they are marked on the PCB silkscreen. Check their values closely
against the overlay diagram, since
the markings are quite small. There
are nine capacitors and three resistors that must be fitted. Be careful not
to get the capacitors mixed up once
you remove them from their packages;
they will not be marked with values.
If you wish to enable the onboard
trace antenna, you need to close JP1.
An M1608/0603 0W resistor will work,
but the easiest way to do this is to
generously apply solder with an iron
to both of JP1’s pads. The solder mask
will cause the solder to bead, but if
you add enough solder, you should
be able to bridge the pads (you can
see we did it in our photos).
You can now enable the squelch feature by adding a resistor (we suggest
10kW) to the R5 pads if you want. We
have also labelled this with Squelch
text.
At this stage, we recommend cleaning the board thoroughly with your
recommended flux cleaner or another solvent.
Allow the board to dry and scrutinise it for bridges and pins not soldered to the pads below. If you see
any problems, touch up the board,
then clean it and allow it to dry again.
Fitting the headers
We recommended using right-angle
headers since they will match the
headers found on other common
modules. However, you could choose
straight headers if you need to mount
the Receiver Module parallel to another PCB. It will depend on your
planned application.
If you are connecting the Receiver Module to an existing design, use
two four-way headers. Older designs
will not expect a connection for the
RSSI pin, so you should leave that
pad unconnected (you could run a
flying lead from that pad if you want
to monitor the RSSI output).
73
Constructional Project
We recommend slotting the two
groups of headers into a longer header
socket to keep them aligned to the correct 0.1in pitch before soldering (see
the photo below). Solder the pins in
your preferred orientation, then remove
them from the header socket.
If you have jumpered the onboard
antenna, the external ANT pin does
not need to be connected. In this case,
all the connections that are usually
needed (GND, DATA and Vcc) are at
one end of the board, and can be made
using a single four-way header.
tor between its base & emitter could
also be used as a threshold detector,
as shown in Fig.5. The RSSI signal is
fed into the base and the 1kW resistor
on the Receiver PCB forms a divider
with the external resistor to set the
threshold.
We tried this out on a breadboard
and it worked quite well. You could
also bypass the LED and use the voltage at the collector as an active-low
digital RSSI threshold signal to a microcontroller or other circuitry.
Using it
Our 433MHz Receiver Module has
some handy features that make it a
better choice for new designs. It generally responds more quickly to an
incoming RF signal.
At the same time, it is backward-
compatible with older modules for use
in legacy circuits that require a 433MHz
receiver. The Receiver Module works
with 5V and 3.3V systems, which we
think will cover most cases.
The squelch feature does not appear
to eliminate noisy data output during
the gaps between RF transmissions,
but it does reduce it. We think that
the RSSI output will be more useful
in testing the validity of a signal on
the DATA pin.
Our Receiver consumes a bit more
current than the commercial equivalent,
but it is still low enough that it could,
for example, be powered from a microcontroller GPIO pin, allowing it to be
completely powered off if necessary.
The Receiver Module is quite sensitive, even when just using the onboard
PCB trace antenna, picking up all transmissions that the prebuilt module could
with an external antenna. Our design
still allows for an external antenna if
PE
that is preferred.
Since it is a module, the usage will
depend a lot on your intended project. In general, you should connect a
supply of 3.3-5V to one or more of the
Vcc pins and one or more of the GND
pins. If you have not enabled the onboard antenna, an external antenna
should be connected to the ANT pin.
As we noted earlier, a 173mm-long
wire (including the length of the headers and traces back to the matching network) works well as a quarter-wave antenna for 433MHz. It can be curled or
corkscrewed to save space if necessary.
We have found that the Receiver
Module is capable of receiving nearby
signals without an external antenna;
you might try this for testing purposes. In general, you should have no
trouble using it to replace a receiver
anywhere we have specified a similar
prebuilt module.
The RSSI voltage
The RSSI pin delivers an analog
voltage between 0.5V and 2.0V, so a
microcontroller with an analog-to-
digital converter will be well-suited
to monitoring the RSSI.
Our unit varied around 0.9V to 1.1V
We closed JP1 by bridging it with
solder (you can also use a small
0W SMD resistor). You will need a
generous amount to bridge the gap
between the pads.
74
Conclusion
Fig.5: this simple circuit can be used
to generate an indication that an
RF transmission is being received
based on the RSSI. The resistors set
the threshold to about 1.2V, which
we found to be a suitable level for
distinguishing a valid signal from
none.
when no intended transmission was
occurring. This level might be lower
in a less urban area than the location
of our lab.
With an active transmitter, we saw
values between 1.3V and 2.0V. This
could be measured by a microcontroller’s ADC (analog-to-digital converter) peripheral to detect the presence of a signal. Another option is
a comparator set to an appropriate
threshold.
Some micros (including the 8-bit
PIC16F18146) include a comparator
peripheral that could be used for this
purpose. The micro could then be programmed to ignore any transitions on
the DATA pin unless the RSSI indicates
that a strong enough signal is present.
An NPN transistor with a 1kW resis-
Using a socket strip as a guide
will ensure that the pins are soldered with the
correct separation even though they are in two groups.
Practical Electronics | June | 2026
|