Silicon ChipTechno Talk - August 2020 SILICON CHIP
  1. Outer Front Cover
  2. Contents
  3. Subscriptions: PE Subscription
  4. Subscriptions: PicoLog Cloud
  5. Back Issues: PICOLOG
  6. Publisher's Letter
  7. Feature: The Fox Report by Barry Fox
  8. Feature: Techno Talk by Mark Nelson
  9. Feature: Net Work by Alan Winstanley
  10. Project: Micromite LCD BackPack V3 by Tim Blythman
  11. Project: Steering Wheel audio BUTTON TO INFRARED Adaptor by John Clarke
  12. Project: JUNK MAIL REPELLER! by Allan Linton-Smith
  13. Back Issues by Jim Rowe
  14. Project: Bargain Modules Class-D Stereo Plus Subwoofer Amplifier by Allan Linton-Smith
  15. Feature: Circuit Surgery by Ian Bell
  16. Feature: AUDIO OUT by Jake Rothman
  17. Feature: Make it with Micromite by Phil Boyce
  18. Feature: Practically Speaking by Mike Hibbett
  19. Feature: Max’s Cool Beans by Max the Magnificent
  20. Feature: Electronic Building Blocks by Julian Edgar
  21. PCB Order Form
  22. Advertising Index

This is only a preview of the August 2020 issue of Practical Electronics.

You can view 0 of the 72 pages in the full issue.

Articles in this series:
  • Techno Talk (August 2020)
  • Techno Talk (August 2020)
  • Techno Talk (September 2020)
  • Techno Talk (September 2020)
  • Techno Talk (October 2020)
  • Techno Talk (October 2020)
  • (November 2020)
  • (November 2020)
  • Techno Talk (December 2020)
  • Techno Talk (December 2020)
  • Techno Talk (January 2021)
  • Techno Talk (January 2021)
  • Techno Talk (February 2021)
  • Techno Talk (February 2021)
  • Techno Talk (March 2021)
  • Techno Talk (March 2021)
  • Techno Talk (April 2021)
  • Techno Talk (April 2021)
  • Techno Talk (May 2021)
  • Techno Talk (May 2021)
  • Techno Talk (June 2021)
  • Techno Talk (June 2021)
  • Techno Talk (July 2021)
  • Techno Talk (July 2021)
  • Techno Talk (August 2021)
  • Techno Talk (August 2021)
  • Techno Talk (September 2021)
  • Techno Talk (September 2021)
  • Techno Talk (October 2021)
  • Techno Talk (October 2021)
  • Techno Talk (November 2021)
  • Techno Talk (November 2021)
  • Techno Talk (December 2021)
  • Techno Talk (December 2021)
  • Communing with nature (January 2022)
  • Communing with nature (January 2022)
  • Should we be worried? (February 2022)
  • Should we be worried? (February 2022)
  • How resilient is your lifeline? (March 2022)
  • How resilient is your lifeline? (March 2022)
  • Go eco, get ethical! (April 2022)
  • Go eco, get ethical! (April 2022)
  • From nano to bio (May 2022)
  • From nano to bio (May 2022)
  • Positivity follows the gloom (June 2022)
  • Positivity follows the gloom (June 2022)
  • Mixed menu (July 2022)
  • Mixed menu (July 2022)
  • Time for a total rethink? (August 2022)
  • Time for a total rethink? (August 2022)
  • What’s in a name? (September 2022)
  • What’s in a name? (September 2022)
  • Forget leaves on the line! (October 2022)
  • Forget leaves on the line! (October 2022)
  • Giant Boost for Batteries (December 2022)
  • Giant Boost for Batteries (December 2022)
  • Raudive Voices Revisited (January 2023)
  • Raudive Voices Revisited (January 2023)
  • A thousand words (February 2023)
  • A thousand words (February 2023)
  • It’s handover time (March 2023)
  • It’s handover time (March 2023)
  • AI, Robots, Horticulture and Agriculture (April 2023)
  • AI, Robots, Horticulture and Agriculture (April 2023)
  • Prophecy can be perplexing (May 2023)
  • Prophecy can be perplexing (May 2023)
  • Technology comes in different shapes and sizes (June 2023)
  • Technology comes in different shapes and sizes (June 2023)
  • AI and robots – what could possibly go wrong? (July 2023)
  • AI and robots – what could possibly go wrong? (July 2023)
  • How long until we’re all out of work? (August 2023)
  • How long until we’re all out of work? (August 2023)
  • We both have truths, are mine the same as yours? (September 2023)
  • We both have truths, are mine the same as yours? (September 2023)
  • Holy Spheres, Batman! (October 2023)
  • Holy Spheres, Batman! (October 2023)
  • Where’s my pneumatic car? (November 2023)
  • Where’s my pneumatic car? (November 2023)
  • Good grief! (December 2023)
  • Good grief! (December 2023)
  • Cheeky chiplets (January 2024)
  • Cheeky chiplets (January 2024)
  • Cheeky chiplets (February 2024)
  • Cheeky chiplets (February 2024)
  • The Wibbly-Wobbly World of Quantum (March 2024)
  • The Wibbly-Wobbly World of Quantum (March 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Wait! What? Really? (April 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Wait! What? Really? (April 2024)
  • Techno Talk - One step closer to a dystopian abyss? (May 2024)
  • Techno Talk - One step closer to a dystopian abyss? (May 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Program that! (June 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Program that! (June 2024)
  • Techno Talk (July 2024)
  • Techno Talk (July 2024)
  • Techno Talk - That makes so much sense! (August 2024)
  • Techno Talk - That makes so much sense! (August 2024)
  • Techno Talk - I don’t want to be a Norbert... (September 2024)
  • Techno Talk - I don’t want to be a Norbert... (September 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Sticking the landing (October 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Sticking the landing (October 2024)
  • Techno Talk (November 2024)
  • Techno Talk (November 2024)
  • Techno Talk (December 2024)
  • Techno Talk (December 2024)
  • Techno Talk (January 2025)
  • Techno Talk (January 2025)
  • Techno Talk (February 2025)
  • Techno Talk (February 2025)
  • Techno Talk (March 2025)
  • Techno Talk (March 2025)
  • Techno Talk (April 2025)
  • Techno Talk (April 2025)
  • Techno Talk (May 2025)
  • Techno Talk (May 2025)
  • Techno Talk (June 2025)
  • Techno Talk (June 2025)
  • Techno Talk (July 2025)
  • Techno Talk (July 2025)
The benefits of hindsight Techno Talk Mark Nelson We ignore the importance of hindsight – and foresight – at our peril. Hindsight doesn’t deliver all the answers, but it can shine a useful spotlight on vital information and insights that might not otherwise be obvious. Applying hindsight, this article may help you assess some past predictions in a new light. O f course, the greatest value of hindsight is that it provides the purest form of 20:20 vision. This is in total contrast to foresight, which is notoriously hazy, no matter what policy leaders may claim. This key shortcoming was best summed up by Danish scientist and Nobel Prize winner Niels Bohr, who famously stated: ‘Prediction is very difficult, especially if it’s about the future.’ Examining hindsight, on the other hand, often provides clues to the best course to follow in the future. It also gives us the ability to recognise truly far-sighted vision, albeit long after the event. Two examples demonstrate how. The Internet vision of 1942 Here’s a report from the May 1942 issue of trade magazine Electrical Trading. In the middle of the Second World War, radio pioneer and first chief engineer of the BBC, Peter Eckersley offered his opinions on ‘The Future of Radio Communication’ when he addressed members of the British Institution of Radio Engineers at their April meeting. He described the limitation of radio communication channels currently available and in explaining how ‘wired wireless’ alias ‘radio relay’ could be developed to advantage, he accurately predicted Internet Radio. ‘Dealing with wired broadcasting, Captain Eckersley thought this system would provide a solution to ether congestion, and envisaged a future when perhaps a special cable would be laid to every house, not only in this country, but in every country of the world, linking continents as far apart as Europe and America, although he realised the present difficulties of operating a submarine cable of such dimensions. The number of channels available in a wired system would be infinite, and in this he saw in the future a solution of our broadcasting problems.’ When Eckersley spoke, many towns in Britain already had radio relay systems delivering a choice of interference-free radio programmes by cable. 10 David Elliott recalls: ‘My parents were on radio relay in Chelsea in London in October 1939. They paid seven shillings for the loudspeaker, which they then owned. It was wired up to the relay system, for which they paid around one shilling a week. There were two programmes, the BBC Home Service and later BBC Forces. In 1945, The Forces service became BBC Light Programme. In 1949 two more stations were added: BBC Third Programme and a fourth station which provided popular music from abroad and Radio Luxembourg in the evening. In 1955, BBC and ITV television were added.’ More memories of wired wireless at: https://bit.ly/pe-aug20-relay Cellphones foreseen in 1946 Today, the name of prolific author Miles Henslow is little remembered, although you may have come across the annual Hi-Fi Yearbook publications that he produced during the 1950s and 60s. In 1946, he wrote a comprehensive book titled The Miracle of Radio that is a detailed survey of how wireless contributed to the Allied success in World War Two. What caught my eye is the uncanny accuracy of his prediction of how cellular radio might develop, at a time when the only mobile radio equipment in day-to-day use was in selected police cars (the radio apparatus completely filled the boot of a squad car). ‘Maybe it will sound a far-fetched idea today, but the time is surely approaching when everyone will be able to carry about with him a small radio telephone. War-time development of apparatus to work on very short wavelengths has opened up many new entrancing possibilities. Hundreds of thousands of ‘radio-telephone channels’ can be used over short distances without interference; and the installation of a network of automatic telephone exchanges might well be utilised for handling the calls from a multitude of pedestrian or automobile telephone subscribers, to sort them out and to pass them by line – or radio link – to main exchanges. Certainly, it is but a matter of time before the railway traveller is able to pick up the ’phone and dial his office or his home.’ The matter of time was in fact 39 years; Vodafone and BT Cellnet introduced cellular mobile radio in 1985. The hand-portable phones used were the Motorola ‘brick’, costing around £1,000 in 1985 money (equivalent to £2,630 or £3,050 today, according to which inflation calculator you use). Correcting errors Although hindsight doesn’t give us the ability to alter past mistakes, it does enable us to acknowledge and correct the blunders that we’ve made – and I made an egregious error in the June issue. I stated that, from memory, the first S-DeC breadboards cost about £20, equivalent to £266 in today’s money. What utter tosh! The actual cost was 29s 6d (plus 6d for post and packing). This equates to £22.93 according to the inflation calculator that I used. How could I get it so utterly wrong? I blame the fuzzy logic in my befuddled brain – but I do have an excuse. What I was remembering, poorly expressed, was its equivalent price and the £20 I stated is not far off the £22.93 in 2020 money that the breadboard would have cost me in 1967. In those days, I was a bus conductor, earning £6 a week. Thirty shillings was a quarter of my weekly pay packet, so you can see why I couldn’t afford to fork out that much money for an S-DeC! If you’re wondering how I suddenly developed this miraculous feat of total recall, I’ll tell you. I was shifting a pile of paperwork last week and tucked under this I discovered a long-forgotten October 1967 copy of Practical Electronics. Back then I never dreamed I would one day write for the publication. In this issue was a full-page advertisement introducing S-Dec as ‘the breadboard for the transistor age’. We have come a long way since then, haven’t we? Practical Electronics | August | 2020