This is only a preview of the April 2026 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 36 of the 104 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Articles in this series:
Items relevant to "PicoSDR Shortwave Receiver":
Articles in this series:
Items relevant to "DCC/DC Stepper Motor Driver":
Items relevant to "Calliope Amplifier":
Items relevant to "Micromite-based Music Player":
Purchase a printed copy of this issue for $14.00. |
The miniature 100W Hummingbird Amplifier from December
2021 has been popular, but some of the parts used
in that design are now obsolete. This
improved version features several
minor improvements, plus the
ability to use a wide range of
transistors in several roles.
100W Calliope
Amplifier
by Phil Prosser
T
his amplifier is founded on a
classic design made famous by
Douglas Self as the ‘blameless
amplifier’, and is reliable and powerful, especially for its size. As with
many things in the electronics field,
parts change and go obsolete.
Since it is useful and popular, we
thought it was worth updating to use
currently available devices, with as
many alternatives as possible; in case
something else becomes hard to get...
While at it, we have made a few optimisations to the layout, which at least
technically improves the performance
of this amplifier. Still, the performance
of the original amplifier was very good,
so we consider these minor upgrades.
Part of the popularity of the Hummingbird amplifier module is that it
that packs a surprising punch for its
size, while keeping the low-distortion
characteristics of the Ultra-LD Amplifiers from which it takes inspiration.
It can achieve up to 60W into 8W or
100W into 4W with distortion below
0.0005% at 1kHz, and less than
0.004% all the way up to 20kHz. That’s
way better than “CD quality”.
This project is more about the process of dealing with obsolescence, validating the changes and some discussion on the measurements we made.
For an in-depth explanation of the
design itself, refer to the original article
(siliconchip.au/Article/15126).
If you are in for a truly deep dive
into amplifier design, look up Douglas Self’s books, especially the Power
Amplifier Design Handbook that we
reviewed in the March 2010 issue
(siliconchip.au/Article/89). It is still
very much relevant more than 15
years later.
Maintaining and supporting this
design is a balancing act between
making necessary changes and adding
improvements while maintaining both
physical and performance compatibility with the original design.
The part that triggered this update is
the KSC3503 transistor (Q14) used in
the voltage amplification stage (VAS),
between the input differential pair and
Scopes 1 & 2: a Calliope amplifier driven into clipping with a KSC3503 transistor as the VAS compared to another
Calliope board with an MJE340 for the VAS (right). With the MJE340, it spends quite a long time ‘stuck’ to the negative
rail. For high-frequency signals, this can get very ugly.
66
Silicon Chip
Australia's electronics magazine
siliconchip.com.au
the output stage. This does not look
that critical, but it provides the bulk of
the voltage gain in the amplifier. How
this transistor behaves as it enters and
leaves saturation, which occurs when
the amplifier clips, is an important but
unusual requirement.
For a transistor to do well as a VAS
device, it needs to handle high voltages, and its Cob (output capacitance)
needs to be extremely low, ideally only
a couple of picofarads. In the old days,
this was an easy thing to find, as the
video stage in cathode ray tube (CRT)
television sets demanded similar specifications. These are broadly:
● Output capacitance (Cob): very
low, ideally < 3pF
● Collector-emitter voltage (BVceo):
>150V
● Current gain bandwidth product
(Ft): ideally in the 50-100MHz region
● Collector current (DC): >50mA
● Power dissipation: >1W
When we saw the KSC3503 was
marked as ‘end of life’, we went looking for an alternative part. With the
passing of the days of CRT monitors,
there is little reason for manufacturers to produce this type of device.
We knew this would not be a simple
change, as we looked for good VAS
transistors during the original design.
After days of searching suppliers
and audio forums, it started looking
like the only option was a surface-
mounting device. Were we being
silly? Should we care that much?
What happens if we just throw a
bog standard MJE340 into the board
instead? Well, the amplifier will work,
but you take a serious hit on how it
behaves around clipping, and in general performance and stability, as
shown in Scopes 1 & 2.
Less critical but also important for
the future, the range of output devices
and drivers has changed. We bought
a selection of different parts and validated them, so you can confidently
build this with one of numerous parts
options. Of particular interest to us are
new output device options (see Table 1
overleaf) and driver transistor options
(Table 2).
As can be seen in Table 3, ideal
options for the VAS are pretty limited,
and there is no ideal part that is readily available in a through-hole package. There are some decent choices in
SOT-223 (a fairly large SMD package),
though. So we had to bite the bullet
and make board changes to accommodate SMD parts for the VAS.
To test the VAS devices, we set up
a Calliope on our test jig (Photo 1),
set the input to 0.9V RMS and connected a 3W load. We then tested each
VAS device, one after another, without changing any settings or moving
cables. This setup might look agricultural, but has a fair bit of thought in it
and allows an objective comparison
between modules.
The test jig allows rapid changeover
between modules and allows us to
change components in situ, as the base
is narrow enough to access the rear of
the boards. It includes enough local filtering to let us run it from a bench DC
supply, so there are no mains voltages
involved, and we have a 6A current
limit on our power supply. Despite
that, it is beefy enough to allow us to
run the amplifiers hard.
The heatsink is undersized, and
gets very hot on long tests, but this
is handy, as we want to know how
the various versions behave when
abused.
Amplifier Features
Accepts a wide range of easy-toget parts (especially transistors)
Low distortion and noise
Extremely compact PCB
Fits vertically on a 75mm heatsink,
and can be stacked in a 2RU case
Produces the specified output
continuously with passive cooling
Uses all through-hole parts (or
optionally, one SMD for the VAS
transistor)
Low in cost and simple to build
Onboard DC fuses
Output over-current and shortcircuit protection
Clean overload recovery with
minimal ringing
Improved tolerance of hum and
EMI fields through small size and
improved layout
Quiescent current adjustment with
temperature compensation
Amplifier Specifications
Output Power (with ±34V DC rails):
100W RMS into 4Ω, 60W RMS into
8Ω
Frequency response (-3dB): 1Hz to
150kHz
Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR): 118dB
with respect to 50W into 4Ω
Input Sensitivity: 1.2V RMS for
60W into 8Ω, 1.04V RMS for 100W
into 4Ω
Input impedance: 22kΩ || 1nF
Total harmonic distortion (THD)
(32W into 8Ω, ±32V DC): < 0.005%,
20Hz to 20kHz, 50kHz bandwidth
Photo 1: our test
rig made it really
easy to measure
the difference in
performance as we
changed various
transistors on
the board. You
can see the
difference
between the
correct wiring
on the right
(cyan curve in Fig.2)
and the incorrect
wiring on the left
(mauve curve).
siliconchip.com.au
Stability: unconditional with any
normal speaker load ≥4Ω
Power Supply: ±20-40V DC; ideally
±34V DC from a 25-0-25V AC
transformer
Quiescent current: 53mA nominal
Quiescent power: 4W nominal
Output offset: typically <20mV
(measured)
Australia's electronics magazine
April 2026 67
Table 1 – output transistor options (available from Mouser, DigiKey & element14)
Device
Key characteristics
Comment
MJW21193G/
MJW21194G
High gain, optimised for
linearity
A new version of a
‘bulletproof’ favourite
MJW21195G/
MJW21196G
High gain, optimised for
linearity
A new, higher-voltage
version of a ‘bulletproof’
favourite
MJL21195G/
MJL21196G
Same as above but in a
slightly different package
TTA1943Q/TTC5200Q Targets audio
or 2SA1943/2SC5200 applications – linear gain
A cost-effective version
of another old favourite –
higher Hfe and Ft
NJW0281G/
NJW0302G
Lower power versions of
a ‘standard’
Optimised for match and
linearity – lower power
MJL21193G/
MJL21194G
Known good
MJL3281A/
MJL1302A
Known good
NJW21193G/
NJW21194G
Known good
2SC5242/2SA1962
Known good
Table 2 – driver transistor options (available from Mouser, DigiKey & element14)
Device
Key characteristics
Comment
MJF15030G/MJF15031G
Insulated-tab versions of
standard output drivers
Known good
MJE15030G/MJE15031G
Known good
MJE15032G/MJE15033G
Known good
Table 3 – VAS transistor options (most available from Mouser, DigiKey & element14)
Device
Package
Key characteristics
Comment
KSC2690A
TO-126
A higher Cob than
preferred
Works, but with some
sticking on clipping
KSC1845FTA
TO-92
On the edge with power Do not use at high
handling
voltages
KSC3503
TO-126
Obsolete/hard to find
Known good, if you can
get them
2N6517TA
TO-92
Higher Cob than
preferred
Works fine but do not use
at elevated voltages
BSP19-115
SOT-223
70MHz Ft
Prefer BF720/722
BF720
SOT-223
60MHz Ft
Works fine
BF722
SOT-223
60MHz Ft
Works fine (preferred)
PZTA42-TP
SOT-223
50MHz Ft
Assumed OK given DZTA
tests
DZTA42-13
SOT-223
50MHz Ft
Works fine (almost
surprisingly well)
2SC2911
TO-126
Obsolete/hard to find
A good choice if you can
get them
2SC3416
TO-126
Obsolete/hard to find
A good choice if you can
get them
BF469
TO-126
Obsolete/hard to find
An outstanding part if
you can get them
68
Silicon Chip
Australia's electronics magazine
We found a handful of BF469 transistors that had been gathering dust.
We don’t use obsolete parts in projects,
so they are not specified here, but it is
an old-school legendary VAS driver.
Since we had the test jig up and running, we dropped one in to compare
to all the other choices. It did very
well, so if you have a few BF469s and
are building this amplifier, we suggest
you use them.
Load line curves, which show the
safety margins for the various output
transistor options with 4W & 8W reactive loads (simulating typical loudspeakers) are shown in Figs.1(a) & 1(b).
You can see that all the options are
more than good enough for 8W loads,
apart from the venerable TIP35/36,
which are marginal but work if you
limit the supply rail voltages.
The recommended devices for 4W
loudspeakers are shown in Fig.1(b)
and they are all suitable. Fig.1(c)
shows how the single-slope load line
protection curves compare to the
SOA curves for a selection of output devices. The circuit is designed
to limit the devices to stay under the
dashed lines, which are fully within
the respective SOA curves, providing
complete protection.
There is no need to actually change
the general design, as the ‘blameless’
configuration is known to be good and
in use in many amplifiers around the
world. However, while we were at
the computer shuffling parts around,
it gave us the opportunity to make
some changes that have been on our
‘to-do list’ for some time. The changes
we have made to the PCB layout are:
● Moving the driver transistors
from the middle of the board to right
next to the output devices, and moving the bias setting potentiometer and
associated parts. This reduces routing complexity and provides better
thermal coupling of the driver transistors to the output stage, which
will improve thermal stability. The
better routing should improve high-
frequency performance, although this
is not something we could measure.
● We made room for a VAS transistor in an SMD SOT-223 package, with
a modest PCB heatsink area, while
keeping the option to use a TO-126
through-hole device.
We also tried a few different VAS
compensation schemes, in particular,
two-pole compensation as used on
the Ultra-LD Mk.3 & Mk.4 Amplifiers.
siliconchip.com.au
Photo 2: the Calliope (Hummingbird
Mk2) Amplifier module.
We could measure a difference, but
with this amplifier being so squished,
we saw more effect from wiring layout changes than the compensation
change delivered. So we used the
KISS principle on this and went back
to single-pole compensation. The final
board is shown in Photo 2.
Performance
Fig.2 shows total harmonic distortion plus noise (THD+N) measurements for the new amplifier into a 9W
resistive load at 32W. This is what we
could generate using our bench supply, but it is representative of what will
be achieved at higher supply voltages
into normal loudspeaker loads.
The performance is essentially the
same as the original Hummingbird.
If you are comparing this to what we
published in the December 2021 issue,
it’s important to realise that this plot
includes noise, whereas the earlier one
was THD only, so that plot showed
lower figures.
As with the original design, we have
tested the distortion of a range of output devices, VAS transistors and output drivers to ensure it behaves well
with all of them.
An important test for an audio
amplifier is how it behaves coming
out of clipping, especially with low
impedance loads. If you have the
wrong VAS device, it will ‘stick’ to the
negative rail, and if the output stage
has very high-frequency devices, you
can find bursts of oscillation near negative rail clipping. Scope 3 shows the
behaviour when driving a worst-case
3W load.
Figs.1(a)-(c):
SOA curves
and load
lines for
the various
output device
options
with 4W &
8W reactive
(loudspeakerlike) loads.
The dashed
lines in
Fig.1(c)
show the
protection
lines that
the circuit
prevents the
devices from
exceeding,
which
remain
within
their safe
operating
areas (SOA).
siliconchip.com.au
Australia's electronics magazine
April 2026 69
We also have checked the squarewave behaviour. The Calliope is very
well behaved with what is essentially
a band-limited square wave output.
We tested the harmonics generated
by the Calliope using a high-quality
audio spectrum analyser and found
they are very low in level. All harmonics are in the region of -110dBc
(0.000316%) to -115dBc (0.000177%).
Circuit details
Scope 3: clipping with the recommended BF722 VAS. The slight sticking to
the rails is normal; the amplifier recovers from saturation at a high output
current without ringing or oscillation.
Fig.2: three THD+N plots for the Calliope amplifier module at a reasonably
high operating power into a resistive dummy load. The cyan curve shows
what you can expect if you follow our instructions, while the mauve curve
is what you get if you don’t route the output wire as suggested. The red
curve shows the result of all the transistors being mismatched.
We will not go into a detailed
description of the circuit, as the one in
the December 2021 issue still applies.
This article focuses on building the
updated amplifier. You can download
or purchase this article from our website if you don’t have a copy and want
the detailed design description.
The Hummingbird and Calliope
amplifiers are physically much smaller
than those in the Ultra-LD series, but a
review of the circuit (shown in Fig.3)
reveals that it is very similar, with
the major difference being that Hummingbird/Calliope uses only one pair
of output devices (to handle up to
100W) instead of two (up to 200W),
and is optimised for operation at the
lower voltages that implies.
There are three main stages in a
‘blameless amplifier’. These are all
described in detail in the original
article:
1. The input stage, which uses Q7
& Q8 as a differential pair having a
constant-current source (Q3) and a
current-mirror load (Q15 & Q16).
2. The voltage amplifier stage (VAS),
comprising Q14 driven by emitter-
follower Q13 and loaded by constant-
current source Q2.
3. The output stage, which comprises
transistors Q4/Q5 & Q11/Q12, plus protection devices Q6/Q10. This is a conventional complementary output stage.
While the Hummingbird Mk1 and
Calliope circuits are very similar, if
Table 4 – protection resistor values for various output devices
NPN device
PNP device
22kW
W 560W
W 220W
W Comments
MJW21194G MJW21193G 22kW 560W 220W Performs as presented
NJW21194G
NJW21193G
22kW 560W 220W Performs as presented
MJL21194
MJL21193
22kW 560W 220W Performs as presented
2SC5242
2SA1962
15kW 470W 220W Limit to 25V AC transformer if driving difficult 4W loads
2SC5200
2SA1943
12kW 560W 180W Performs as presented
TTC5200Q
TTA1943Q
12kW 560W 180W Essentially the same performance
MJL3281A
MJL1302A
15kW 560W 180W Essentially the same performance
TIP35B/C
TIP36B/C
10kW 680W 180W Limit to 25V AC transformer, prefer 8W load; good performance
TIP3055
70
Silicon CTIP2955
hip
12kW 680W Australia's
270W Limit
to 25V AC
transformer & 8W loads; not verified
electronics
magazine
siliconchip.com.au
you compare Figs.4 & 5, you will see
how much the layout has changed.
Note how the new PCB accommodates either a through-hole or SMD
package transistor Q14. We have
thoroughly tested the various output
transistor, driver transistor and VAS
options.
We have stuck to the MJE150XX
family of driver transistors because
they are available, robust and perform
well. Any of the devices in this series
will do as long as you use the complementary NPN and PNP types. The layout changes have shifted the drivers
and resulted in a new layout for the
whole top half of the board.
This provides better thermal coupling of the drivers to the output
devices, and reduces the length of
traces with the relatively high base
drive current for the output devices,
improving stability. Should you be
using this amplifier in a very demanding application, there is still room to
mount small heatsinks to the output
driver transistors.
We have kept all mechanical features the same between versions, so if
you need to mix and match or replace
Hummingbird and Calliope amplifier
modules, everything will drop in.
We have kept the over-current/safe
operating area (SOA) protection for the
output devices. This provides protection if you connect a really horrible
load or somebody abuses the amplifier.
The Hummingbird amplifier delivers the measured performance with the
parts specified, but we have checked
that it works properly with a range
of other parts. For different output
devices, change the protection resistor values as per Table 4.
An amplifier using a dual 25-30V
AC output transformer, diode bridge
and capacitor bank will have ±35-42V
DC rails, which is safe operating into
4W, 6W and 8W loads. This will deliver
60W into an 8W load and 100W into
a 4W load.
Component matching
Part selection for the Calliope amplifier should be fairly straightforward.
We have provided tables of tested
parts. Provided you use complementary pairs for the output devices and
drivers, and select matched pairs for
the input differential amplifier and
current mirror, you will be fine.
The output pair; for example,
NJW21193/NJW21194, and the
siliconchip.com.au
Challenges with measuring low distortion levels
Measuring very low levels of distortion is a lot harder than it might seem. There are a
few reasons for this, including:
1. Generating a sinewave test signal that is pure enough to measure distortion at levels below 0.001% reliably is hard, especially if you want to vary the frequency.
2. Knowing if what you are measuring is your measurement system or the device
under test is also tricky.
3. Even a tiny bit of EMI pickup can make huge differences in the measurements (simply rotating or moving the DUT can make the readings change massively).
4. Depending on how you Earth the DUT, you can measure voltages induced across
ground wires if you are not very careful.
For #1, we ended up using a Stanford Research Systems DS360 Ultra Low Distortion
Function Generator.
To measure the Calliope amplifier’s output harmonics, we are using a high-quality
sound card/ADC that requires a line level signal, so we use a 2.2kW/120W resistive
divider across the amplifier’s output, in parallel with our dummy load.
If we feed the test signal back into the ADC directly, we get a THD reading of 0.00017%,
so anything higher than that means we are measuring the amplifier’s distortion.
While making amplifier measurements, we got a distortion reading of 0.0018%. While
that is still not very high, it’s an order of magnitude higher than we were expecting. After
a lot of fiddling, we realised that it depends on which of the two screw terminals of CON4
we make the measurement at!
Connecting our measurement system to the unused terminal of the output connector
gave a lower distortion reading than the one that is carrying the current (Photo 3). The
only differences we see between these two points are:
1. We had to move the measurement probe and cabling slightly, which will pick up
different magnetic fields.
2. The output current is going through the PCB-to-connector junction and the connector-to-output wire junction (this is probably the reason, as dissimilar metal junctions
can be non-linear).
The point of mentioning this is that, when you are aiming for very low distortion, all
sorts of second order things start to matter, such as:
1. Earthing and where currents flow (probably the most significant concern)
2. Wiring layout, the magnetic fields the wires produce, and what they can couple into
3. The linearity of loads; we have seen wound Nichrome resistors cause significant
problems
4. The types of connector used; our terminals are made of steel, which we think may
be a factor
5. The actual ability of measurement
equipment
Now you know why, in the wiring section,
we recommend running the output wire up
past inductor L1 and trimpot VR1 to join
the supply wires running across the top of
the board. Simply running this wire on the
other side of L1 has a measurable impact
on performance, shown by the difference
between the cyan and red plots in Fig.2.
The effect is real and repeatable; moving the wire increases the size of the positive rail current loop to the output, which
is coupling the positive rail current into the
input and VAS stages. This makes the distortion worse across most of the audible
frequency range.
Photo 3: the two screw terminals on the
output connector are both soldered to
the output track; the left one is carrying
the output current, the right none. We
measured 0.0018% distortion on the left,
0.0007% on the right.
Australia's electronics magazine
April 2026 71
Fig.3: the Calliope circuit is
intentionally similar to the
original Hummingbird; there
are a few subtle tweaks, but
most of the improvements are
in the PCB layout and expanded
transistor choices. While we
have nominated NJL21193/4,
any of the MJL, MJL, NJL or
NJW prefix series with the same
numbers will work pretty much
identically.
Photo 4: the FrankenAmp in all its
glory! The input transistors are all
different parts, as are the drivers and
output pair. Do not do this in your
build unless you are truly desperate.
drivers, MJE15032/MJE15033 are
manufactured to have characteristics
such that the NPN and PNP characteristics reflect one another. This reduces
distortion when used in an amplifier
of this type.
The input differential pair, Q7/Q8,
does the heavy lifting in making sure
that the error in the amplifier output
(ie, distortion) is minimised. It also
plays a very important role in making sure there is no DC offset. These
transistors should be the same as best
we can match them, and ideally, thermally coupled.
The current mirror, Q15/Q16, keeps
the input differential pair in balance
and provides gain. These transistors
should also ideally be matched and
thermally coupled.
Feel free to choose pretty much
any pairs from the table; match those
input transistors and you will be good.
At this point, a question arose in my
mind: what if you get it really wrong? I
couldn’t resist the temptation, so out of
my fervid imagination comes the FrankenAmp (Photo 4). In this unit, every
single part that can be mismatched
was mismatched.
It isn’t just a matter of using BC556s
from different batches, either; in the
FrankenAmp, the input differential
pair is a BC558 and a BC556B, the
current mirror uses a BC549 and a
BC546, and so on. The drivers and
output devices are from completely
different families. How bad could
it be?
Fig.4: the original Hummingbird
Amplifier PCB layout, shown for
comparison to Fig.5.
72
Silicon Chip
Australia's electronics magazine
Unsurprisingly, the DC offset was
terrible, at 140mV. This is because
the gain of the input devices is grossly
mismatched.
Despite this, the amplifier is totally
stable and even behaves OK on clipping. The distortion performance is
even quite reasonable, as shown in
Fig.2! (BD139s are notoriously different between manufacturers; it is
likely I used an old Philips one, better than most).
So even if you get it really wrong,
as long as the DC offset is acceptable,
the amp will work quite well.
Construction
Construction of the Calliope amplifier is pretty easy. It is built on a 63
× 86.5mm double-sided PCB that’s
coded 01111212 – see Fig.5.
First, based on the output devices
you will be using, select the required
resistor values from Table 4. These
components are shown in red in Fig.5.
If you read those same values off
Table 4, build it as per our diagrams.
siliconchip.com.au
Otherwise, substitute the resistors
with values shown in red for the different values in the table.
After fitting those, install all the
other small (¼W resistors). Follow
with the 1N4148/1N914 diodes, making sure they are orientated as per
Fig.5. Follow by fitting all the capacitors, soldering the smaller ceramic
and MKT types first, then the electrolytics. Make sure that the electrolytic
capacitors go in the right way around,
with the longer (positive) leads to the
pads marked +.
If you are using an SMD VAS transistor, as recommended, fit it now, as
there will be more room. Follow with
all remaining transistors, except those
that mount to the heatsink. Ensure
that driver transistors Q4 and Q12 are
installed with their metal tabs facing
towards the amplifier input (ie, away
from the output transistors).
We want transistor pairs Q7/Q8
and Q15/Q16 to be thermally coupled with one another. Our approach
is to superglue these face-to-back, then
siliconchip.com.au
put heatshrink tubing over them. You
could glue them together after mounting them, as long as you mount their
bodies reasonably close.
If you can, select pairs for these
devices with similar Hfe by measuring
a handful of devices and choosing two
that are similar. This can minimise the
DC offset of the final amplifier.
Now solder the fuse clips, making
sure they go in the right way around,
with the retention tabs on the outside.
After that, solder all the connectors.
The wire entries for the power terminal blocks go towards the edges of
the board, while the output connector should have its wire entries facing
towards nearby diodes D1 & D3.
After that, you can mount the larger
resistors (0.22W × 2, 4.7W & 15W) and
the multi-turn potentiometer, VR1.
We need to make sure the potentiometer starts at maximum resistance, so
fit it with the screw located as shown,
Fig.5: the new Calliope PCB layout
moves the driver transistors (Q4 &
Q12) closer to the output transistors
(Q5 & Q11) and makes room for Q14
to be either in a vertically mounted
through-hole (TO-126) package or an
SMD (SOT-223) package.
Australia's electronics magazine
April 2026 73
Parts List – Calliope 100W Amplifier (per module)
1 double-sided PCB coded 01111212, 63 × 86.5mm
1 split rail power supply delivering ±20V to ±40V DC (15-28V AC mains transformer,
bridge rectifier, filter capacitors, mains socket, mains-rated wiring, heatshrink etc)
3 2-way 5/5.08mm pitch mini terminal blocks (CON1, CON3, CON4)
1 2-way polarised/locking pin header (CON2)
4 M205 fuse clips (F1, F2)
2 5A M205 fast-blow ceramic fuses (F1, F2) [Altronics S5931]
1 1m length of 0.8mm diameter enamelled copper wire (L1)
1 500W vertical or side-adjust multi-turn trimpot (VR1)
2 TO-3P insulating kits (washers and bushes)
1 TO-126 insulating kit (washer and bush)
3 M3 × 25mm panhead machine screws
3 flat washers to suit M3 screws
3 crinkle washers to suit M3 screws
3 M3 hex nuts
2 blown M205 fuses (for testing, or purposefully blow 100mA fuses)
1 heatsink (we used one Altronics H0545 for six modules)
1 small tube of superglue
1 5cm length of masking tape
Semiconductors
5 BC556 65V 100mA PNP transistors, TO-92 (Q1, Q3, Q7, Q8, Q10)
1 MJE350 300V 500mA PNP transistor, TO-126 (Q2) [Altronics Z1127, Jaycar ZT2260]
1 MJE15032G or MJE15034G 250V/350V 8A NPN transistor, TO-220 (Q4)
[element14 9556621, DigiKey MJE15034GOS-ND, Mouser 863-MJE15032G]
1 NJW21194G or MJL21194 250V 16A NPN transistor, TO-3P (Q5) [Jaycar ZT2228,
element14 2535656, DigiKey NJW21194GOS-ND, Mouser 863-NJW21194G]
3 BC546 65V 100mA NPN transistors, TO-92 (Q6, Q13, Q17)
1 BD139 80V 1A NPN transistor, TO-126 (Q9) [Altronics Z1068, Jaycar ZT2189]
1 NJW21193G or MJL21193 250V 16A PNP transistor, TO-3P (Q11) [Jaycar ZT2227,
element14 9555781, DigiKey NJW21193GOS-ND, Mouser 863-NJW21193G]
1 MJE15033G or MJE15035G 250V/350V 8A PNP transistor, TO-220 (Q12)
[element14 9556630, DigiKey MJE15035GOS-ND, Mouser 863-MJE15033G]
1 BF722 250V 100mA NPN transistor, SOT-223 (Q14)
[element14 1757916, DigiKey BF722,115, Mouser 771-BF722-T/R]
2 BC549 30V 100mA NPN transistors (Q15, Q16)
3 1N4148/1N914 75V 250mA small signal diodes (D1-D3)
Capacitors
1 220μF 25V electrolytic [Altronics R5144, Jaycar RE6324]
4 100μF 50V 105°C electrolytic [Altronics R4827, Jaycar RE6346]
1 47μF 50V low-ESR electrolytic [Altronics R6107, Jaycar RE6344]
1 10μF 50V non-polarised electrolytic [Altronics R6560, Jaycar RY6810]
1 220nF 63V MKT [Altronics R3029B, Jaycar RM7145]
5 100nF 63V MKT [Altronics R3025B, Jaycar RM7125]
1 22nF 63V MKT [Altronics R3017B, Jaycar RM7085]
1 1nF 63V MKT [Altronics R3001B, Jaycar RM7010]
1 220pF 100V NP0/C0G ceramic [element14 1600858,
DigiKey 56-K221J10C0GH5UH5CT-ND, Mouser 594-K221J15C0GH5TH5]
Resistors (all ¼W+ 1% metal film axial unless otherwise stated)
1 220kW
1 82W
4 22kW ♦
2 68W
2 3.9kW
2 47W ♦
3 2.2kW
1 39W
1 1.2kW
1 15W 1W 5%
2 560W ♦
1 10W
1 390W
2 10W 5W 10% (for testing)
4 220W ♦
1 4.7W 1W 5%
6 100W ♦
2 0.22W 5W 5% ♦
♦ two of each may need to change in value depending on the output transistors used
♦ ½W or 0.6W 1% metal film
♦ element14 1735119, DigiKey BC3440CT-ND, Mouser 594-AC050002207JAC00
then rotate the screw anti-clockwise
until it clicks.
Verify with a multimeter that the
resistance between its two outside terminals is below 25W.
By the way, side-adjustment pots
are better if you’re going to be mounting the amplifiers vertically on the
heatsink, while a top-adjustment pot
makes most sense if it will be mounted
horizontally.
Next, make the inductor using
0.8mm diameter enamelled copper
wire (ECW) as follows:
1. Find a mandrel that is about
10mm diameter and has a slight chamfer to it so that, once complete, you
will be able to slide the inductor off.
We chose a large Sharpie marker.
2. Put masking tape around the
mandrel with the sticky side faced
outwards.
3. Placed a bend in the ECW
30-40mm from the end and wind nine
turns onto the tape.
4. Put a few drops of superglue on
the ECW; don’t worry if it gets on the
masking tape. You do need to be careful not to get glue on your mandrel,
though!
5. Give this a minute to set, then
wind another layer on top of the first
nine turns. You might only be able to
get eight in; that is OK. Add more super
glue and again, allow it to set.
6. Add a final winding layer and
glue it.
7. Push the inductor off the mandrel.
8. Tease the masking tape from
inside the inductor; we used needle-
nosed pliers to do this.
9. Scrape the enamel off the leads
and mount it to the PCB above the
4.7W resistor.
At this point, the board should be
complete bar Q5, Q9 and Q11. From
here, you need to mount the output
devices to their final heatsink using
insulating kits. Then bend the legs of
the transistors to match the PCB, as
shown in the photos. Slip them into
their respective holes on the PCB. The
aim here is that these transistors fit
reasonably well.
Once the three transistors are properly inserted into the PCB, solder them
in place. This way, we know that the
transistors are mounted with minimal
tension on the soldered connections,
ensuring a long life of the solder joints
(a solder joint under stress has a tendency to crack and go dry).
At this point, you should have all
Australia's electronics magazine
siliconchip.com.au
74
Silicon Chip
Photos 5 & 6: The finished Calliope Amplifier, and the test jig used for
measurements. The output wire (brown in this case) should be pushed back to
run next to the emitter resistor, like it does here.
parts mounted to the board, and are
ready to test it.
Testing & adjustment
Your amplifier is probably mounted
to the heatsink, but the initial test can
be done without it – just make sure that
the bias current is set to minimum.
This test will check the amplifier is
operational:
1. Remove the normal 5A fuses from
the board and install blown M205
fuses with 10W 5W resistors soldered
across them (‘safety resistors’).
2. Connect a voltmeter between the
output and ground, set to a 200V range
or similar.
3. Connect a voltmeter across one of
the 10W safety resistors, set on a 20V
range or similar. If you only have one
meter, run an initial check monitoring
the output voltage only.
4. With the input to the module disconnected, apply power. Anything
over about ±15V is fine. If you can, set
the current limit on the power supply
to about 100mA.
5. Check that the output voltage
settles to 0V ±50mV. We built 14 test
units, and all were well within this
range.
6. Check that the voltage across the
10W resistor is less than 1V (ie, it’s
drawing under 100mA).
If either test fails, you need to check
for the cause. Do you have VR1 set at
Songbird
An easy-to-build project
that is perfect as a gift.
SC6633 ($30 plus postage): Songbird Kit
Choose from one of four colours for the PCB (purple, green, yellow or red). The kit includes nearly all
parts, plus the piezo buzzer, 3D-printed piezo mount and switched battery box (base/stand not
included). See the May 2023 issue for details: siliconchip.au/Article/15785
siliconchip.com.au
Australia's electronics magazine
April 2026 75
the right end of its travel? Are all the
electrolytic capacitors in the right way
around? Do you have the input connected? If so, disconnect it. Are all the
transistors in the right places and the
right way around? Check those output
devices are in the right spot!
Is your power supply delivering
both positive and negative rails, and
do you have the ground connected?
Assuming it passes the test, it’s time
to adjust the quiescent current and run
a full operational test. This requires
the amplifier to be mounted to a heatsink with appropriate insulators for
the output devices and thermal sense
transistor. Before powering it up, verify a high resistance between both
power supply rails and the heatsink.
Apply power and adjust the bias by
turning the potentiometer clockwise
while watching the voltage across the
10W resistor. Nothing will happen for
quite a few turns, then the bias current will rapidly increase. Adjust it to
achieve 500mV across the 10W resistor.
Allow this to settle and readjust. It can
take a while to settle, and should be
set with the full rail voltage applied.
Power it off, re-install the 5A fuses
and you are ready to connect a loudspeaker and run it with an audio signal.
You can check the bias (quiescent
current) later by measuring the voltage
across the 0.22W resistors; you should
see close to 10mV across each.
Installation
Our earlier discussion on measurement pointed out the criticality of
Fig.6: when finalising
the amplifier wiring
in your case, run the
supply and output
wire to each module
like this to get the best
performance.
layout to get the most of the amplifier. Careful attention to layout and
the power supply is required.
The power wiring from the main
supply capacitors should be delivered
on twisted sets of positive, negative
and ground wires. The output should
fold back toward the output devices,
and run parallel to the 0.22W resistors,
then follow the power wires – see Fig.6.
The output wire should follow the
power wires back past the power supply and pick up a ground wire, minimising the loop area created, then
run as a pair from there to the speaker
terminals.
Ensure that the power supply has a
‘star Earth point’ from which you connect to the input ground, the amplifier
ground and the speaker output ground,
as shown in Fig.7. Also make sure that
the way you connect the rectifier and
its ground to the capacitors does not
inject noise onto your star Earth point.
The input cable shields/screens
should also be connected to the star
Earth point.
Make sure all connections are secure
and low resistance; poor connections
can easily more than double the distortion level. We found this measuring
a batch of modules we built to verify
our results, having to tighten the connections to achieve consistent results.
Is it worth upgrading a
Hummingbird to the Calliope?
Not really. While the layout is
improved, and we provide options
for some more recent and ‘optimised’
parts, the Hummingbird performs
pretty well. While the Calliope is an
improvement overall, its main advantage is that it is more future-proof and
easier to source parts for. We have a
mix of both in use and are quite comSC
fortable with this.
Boosting the output power
Fig.7: configure your amplifier power supply like this to keep the ripple
currents from recharging the capacitor bank out of the amplifier ground lines.
76
Silicon Chip
Australia's electronics magazine
If you add extra output devices, you
can within reason. But watch the
ratings of your capacitors and input
devices. If you want serious power,
you should consider the SC200
(January-March 2017; siliconchip.
au/Series/308), which gives roughly
double the output power.
Otherwise, the Ultra-LD Mk.3/4
Amplifiers (July-September 2011
& August-October 2015) will give
you roughly the same power as the
SC200 but with lower distortion.
siliconchip.com.au
|