This is only a preview of the July 2026 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 37 of the 104 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Items relevant to "Adjustable Ultrasonic Cleaner":
Items relevant to "Phenomenal Pinball Machine, Part 2":
Items relevant to "DCC Accessory Decoders":
Items relevant to "I2C Controller":
Purchase a printed copy of this issue for $14.00. |
Vintage Radio
National R-72 “Toot-a-Loop” radios
by Ian Batty
Is it a musical
instrument? Is it
a telephone? No,
it’s a radio! This quirky transistor set comes in
a unique, colourful plastic case that’s sure to attract
attention. Inside, the circuitry of this six-transistor set hid some surprises.
W
ho doesn’t remember the 1960s?
The Beatles, the Vietnam War,
moon landings, Mao’s Great Leap Forward, Woodstock, and cars with massive tailfins. Fashion designers shook
free the drab aesthetic of the 1950s,
releasing more and more flamboyant,
colourful, exciting designs in a frenzy
to capture the new postwar economic
boom.
By the late 1960s, transistor radio
engineering had pretty much settled
on the standard set: three radio frequency (RF)/intermediate frequency
(IF) stages, a volume control, an audio
driver and a push-pull Class-B output stage, likely powered by the then-
ubiquitous 9V PP6 battery that’s still
in use today.
Matsushita’s National brand, unable
to use that name in the USA due to an
existing company of the same name,
had rebranded as Panasonic. They put
forward several remarkable offerings;
the R-72 Toot-a-Loop (appearing at the
end of the 1960s) is one of the most
distinctive.
It’s another example of National’s successful marketing strategy:
94
Silicon Chip
visually attractive radios using sound
electronic design. Like the R-70 Panapet (March 2025; siliconchip.au/
Article/17800), the Toot-a-Loop is
unique. Even if you have no idea of
its provenance, you’ll be impressed
by its styling.
As an early ‘wearable’ radio, it’s a
standout. The quirky design was complemented by bright colours to create a
radio rivalled in its overall effect only
by an identical offering from RCA subsidiary Japan Victor Corporation (JVC).
The Toot-a-Loop came in white, red,
blue, yellow, orange and lime, with
the last two options being specific to
the Australia/New Zealand markets.
Our models were badged National
JIS transistor coding
Prefix Type
2SA High-frequency PNP BJT
2SB Audio-frequency PNP BJT
2SC High-frequency NPN BJT
2SD Audio-frequency NPN BJT
2SJ P-channel FETs (JFETs & Mosfets)
2SK N-channel FETs (JFETs & Mosfets)
Australia's electronics magazine
Panasonic and were advertised as a
“Sing-O-Ring”.
Between my yellow and red sets and
what’s online, I’m aware of three different circuits for this radio. Let’s look
at the R-72S yellow set (serial number
88009) first.
Ernst Erb’s Radiomuseum has the
circuit, showing a classic six-transistor
set; my redrawn version is shown in
Fig.1. It runs off a battery of two AA
cells, giving a nominal 3V supply.
The six transistors comprise one converter, two intermediate-
frequency
gain stages, one audio driver, and
the transformer-coupled Class-B output pair.
My example matched this with a
few exceptions. The audio driver transistor, rather than a metal-can germanium PNP 2SB475/AC125 type shown
in the original circuit, is an epoxy silicon NPN type, the 2SC828.
The RF/IF section varied even more;
the converter uses an epoxy silicon
NPN 2SC829 transistor, while the IF
strip has only two IF transformers, one
coupling the converter to the first IF
amplification stage, with the second
siliconchip.com.au
coupling the second IF stage to the
demodulator. It has two IF transistors, both ceramic-cased silicon NPN
2SC920s, with resistance-capacitance
coupling.
The red R-72 set (serial number
11878) runs from a PP6 9V battery.
The RF/IF section is similar to that in
the original R-72S circuit, with three
metal-can PNPs (2SA102, 2SA101 &
2SA101). These are drift types, with
typical ft values in the 25MHz range,
an improvement over the preceding
alloy-junction OC44 with its typical
15MHz ft.
It’s a very similar circuit to that of
the previously reviewed R-70 Panapet. Does that mean my red R-72, apart
from the supply voltage, is similar to
the R-72S? Well, no. It shows a notation for a 2SC829 silicon NPN converter with the correct symbol, but it’s
wired into the circuit with the correct
polarities for a PNP device.
It’s odd that it says 2SC829 (OC1044),
since the OC1044 (2SA101) is definitely a PNP germanium type, which is
what I found installed. Also, the audio
section’s transformerless design uses
two epoxy-cased NPN transistors and
one PNP type.
Online searching revealed the
Philips 20RL012 long-wave-only set
using PNPs for the converter and IF
amplifiers, with a complementary
output stage using NPN and PNP
transistors. It’s an unusual design, as
long-wave broadcasting had begun
declining by the time the Toot-a-Loop
arrived.
So I ended up with two chimeras
– not quite the classic lion’s head,
goat’s body and snake’s tail, but close
enough.
Finding no authoritative circuit for
the yellow set, I resorted to tracing it
out as-built. This was complicated by
the extreme compactness of the design
and by almost all the resistors being
printed onto the circuit board.
Where I would usually lift one end
of a resistor to measure it, I had to
apply my ohmmeter with both polarities and take the higher reading (to
prevent transistor junctions giving a
false reading) or, bravely, short-circuit
bias resistors to ground, measure
the short-circuit current, then apply
Ohm’s Law. You may not want to try
this at home! The resulting circuit for
the red set is shown in Fig.2.
Both sets are built on double-sided
PCBs with most of the resistors
siliconchip.com.au
printed directly onto the phenolic substrate. This would reduce the
amount of mechanical assembly, as
resistors don’t need to be placed prior
to wave-soldering the PCB. It’s also a
great way of reducing the overall size
of the set, and would be highly reliable.
It does make circuit tracing harder,
especially when the as-built set differs as much from available circuits,
as these two do.
So we have three different circuits
for just two sets. Let’s look at the RF/
IF sections first.
Circuit details
The 3V (Fig.1) front-end uses Q1,
an NPN 2SC829 converter transistor.
With a typical ft of 230MHz and being
recommended for “RF amplification,
oscillation, mixing, and IF stages of
FM/AM radios”, it’s similar to the
more familiar BF115.
The base bias for Q1 is supplied
from the decoupled supply via resistive divider R1/R2, with emitter resistor R3 stabilising the circuit, bypassed
by capacitor C4. I’ve never seen a tuning gang returned to the emitter (or
cathode) of a converter before, but
this does conform to the single-point
grounding technique.
Be aware that the tuning gang’s
‘cold’ RF connection is above ground
and must not be used as an earthing
point during testing.
Q1 is configured as a self-oscillating
converter, with the usual ‘Japanese-
style’ oscillator feedback from LO
transformer L2 via 10nF capacitor C3
to the base. Since connecting a signal
generator to the base stops the oscillator, I used a low-value series capacitor
to inject to the top of the tuned antenna
circuit. This confirmed the high sensitivity borne out in testing (more on
that later). IF injection is also reliable.
The converter feeds the tuned,
tapped primary of the first IF transformer, IFT1. Its secondary feeds first
IF amplifier Q2, a 2SC920 transistor with a typical ft of 250MHz. This
stage’s emitter goes directly to ground,
eliminating the usual emitter resistor
and its bypass capacitor. It gets weak
Fig.1: both of my sets had a different
configuration from the ‘standard’
published circuit. This is how my
yellow set was built. It uses many
different transistor types from the
standard circuit and has one fewer IF
transformer, with RC coupling taking
its place.
Australia's electronics magazine
July 2026 95
forward bias via R4, and gain-control
voltage from the demodulator via R10.
Load resistor R5 measured as 1.3kW.
The signal is then resistance-capacitance coupled to Q3, another 2SC920,
via 22nF capacitor C8, working with
fixed bias. Voltage divider R6/R7 measured as 30kW and 16kW, while emitter resistor R8 measured at 210W,
bypassed by 22nF capacitor C9.
IFT1 was confirmed as the first IF
transformer (converter circuit) by its
yellow adjusting cap, and IFT2 as the
final IF transformer (demodulator circuit) by its black adjusting cap. The
usual second IF (white cap) was missing, confirming (i) only two IF transformers and (ii) R-C coupling.
My familiarity with two-stage audio
preamplifiers initially suggested a
direct-coupled design, but the application of AGC would presumably have
disturbed DC operating conditions
excessively.
Q3 feeds final IF transformer IFT2’s
tapped, tuned primary, shunted by
100kW resistor R9, presumably to provide some damping and broaden the
IF bandwidth. IFT2’s secondary feeds
demodulator diode D1, a miniature allglass silicon diode.
Jim Greig’s January 2025 article in
Radio Waves magazine on the Sanyo
RP-1250 shows a circuit that’s very
similar to the R-72. The IF circuit, on
pages 50-51 of that issue, is very similar to that of my Toot-a-Loop. Given the
relationship between Panasonic and
Sanyo, a shared design makes sense.
That circuit notes the silicon rectifier
diode as a BAY41.
A silicon type is needed, rather than
the usual germanium type, as its forward conduction voltage must match
that of silicon transistor Q2 for proper
AGC action. As usual, the diode is
weakly forward-biased by the controlled IF amplifier’s bias circuit, in
this case, 22kW resistor R4.
The rectified IF signal is filtered
by RC network A1. The demodulated
audio is sent to volume control potentiometer VR1, and the rectified DC
component is sent back to the first IF
stage via 7.3kW resistor R10.
Audio stages
The as-built circuit of the yellow
set’s audio stages was close to the
published R-72S circuit, with a few
oddities. The audio driver, rather
than a metal-cased PNP 2SB475, was
an epoxy-cased silicon NPN 2SC828
type.
The R-72S showed an adjustable
resistor of some kind in the lower
end of the 2SB475’s base bias divider,
but no emitter stabilising resistor.
This would be consistent with laser-
trimming, where the set would be put
on test and the resistor element carefully vaporised to give the correct circuit voltages/currents. I was unable to
discover any evidence of laser-trimming, though.
As the 2SC828 is an NPN type, its
emitter returns to supply ground, and
it gets base bias via resistor divider
R11/R12. Its collector feeds the primary of driver transformer T1, with
its ‘cold’ end going to the battery’s
positive terminal. Top cut is applied
to the audio signal via collector-base
feedback capacitor C12 (10nF).
T1 phase-splits the audio signal
and applies it to the bases of transistors Q5 and Q6 in anti-phase. Both are
metal-can germanium PNP 2SB475s.
They get around 200mV of forward
bias via the R15/R16 divider and
temperature compensation via 240W
thermistor R14.
Output transformer T2 feeds the 8W
speaker via the earphone socket, with
the usual disconnection of the speaker
when the earphone jack is plugged in.
Red set front-end
My circuit (Fig.2) may seem unusual
but, as it uses a positive supply, the
audio section is easily understood.
This does ‘invert’ the all-PNP RF/IF
section, with the IF transformer primaries going to ground and transistor
emitters returning to the decoupled
positive supply.
The RF/IF stage is a completely
ordinary all-germanium circuit, which
should be similar to that of the R-72S.
My set differs from the R-72S in that
the latter shows a 2SC829 silicon NPN
converter wired in-circuit as PNP! It
does correctly show its equivalent as
a germanium PNP OC1044, however,
which is equivalent to the 2SA101.
The equivalence is confusing; the
OC1044 is described as a ‘junction’
type (with a typical ft of 15MHz),
while the 2SA101 is a drift-field type,
with a typical fαβ of 25MHz (not an
identical specification to ft but usually close).
As built, converter Q1 gets bias via
divider R1/R2 (5.6kW/33kW), with
emitter stabilisation via 1.2kW resistor R3, bypassed by 22nF capacitor
C4. R2 is one of four discrete resistors,
probably used because printed-circuit
types (marked on the 20RL012 circuit
as “imp”) could not give sufficiently
high (R2/R12) or sufficiently low (R14/
R15) values.
Note, though, that the 20RL012 circuit shows R2 as a printed type.
LO transformer T1’s tuned, tapped
secondary feeds back to Q1’s emitter
via 4.7nF capacitor C3. The tuning
gang uses a cut-plate LO section, so
R14
R9
R15
C13
Both variants (R-72S, left; R-72, right) are built on a double-sided PCB, with only two components on the bottom side.
96
Silicon Chip
Australia's electronics magazine
siliconchip.com.au
there is no padder. The bias voltage
on the converter transistor is only
some 100mV, confirming the Class-B
operation needed for the conversion
process.
Converter Q1 feeds the tapped,
tuned primary of the first IF transformer, IFT1. Its untuned, untapped
secondary feeds the base circuit of the
first IF amplifier transistor, Q2, noted
as a 2SA101/OC1045. Although the
drift construction method improved
high-frequency performance over that
of alloyed-junction devices, the resulting collector-base capacitance was still
significant, so Q2 is neutralised by 2pF
capacitor C8.
Q2 gets weak forward bias via 100kW
resistor R4, bypassed for audio by 10μF
capacitor C7. Q2 feeds second IF transformer IFT2’s tapped, tuned primary,
with its untuned secondary feeding
second IF amplifier transistor Q3.
Unusually, transistor Q3 is also
gain-controlled. This did not give
much better output constancy with
changes in signal strength, but it did
give a very early onset of gain reduction, demanding an abnormally high
input signal to give the standard 50mW
output. More on this below.
Q3 feeds the tapped, tuned primary
of third IF transformer IFT3. Q3 operates without neutralisation, possibly
due to demodulator diode D1’s loading of IFT3 giving a lower gain in this
second IF stage.
Demodulator diode D1, an OA70,
feeds the IF filter block C11/C12/R7.
Audio is fed, via 1kW resistor R9 and
1μF coupling capacitor C14, to the
volume control. D1’s DC output is fed,
via 10kW series resistor R8 and 10μF
audio filter capacitor C7, to the bases
of Q2 and Q3 for AGC, as noted above.
Red set audio stages
The red set’s audio section appears
complicated, but it became the design
of choice and remains so to this day.
You’ll find its principles everywhere,
from the LM386 audio chip to highpower amplifiers in the kilowatt range.
Its circuit stability surpasses that of
previous designs, while the removal
of transformers and most capacitors
allows manufacturers to deliver any
level of performance, from low-power
AM radio quality up to hifi systems of
previously unmatched fidelity.
Transistors Q5 (NPN) and Q6 (PNP)
form a complementary pair. Feeding
an AC signal to their bases will see Q5
siliconchip.com.au
biased on for the positive half-cycle,
with Q6 coming on for the negative
half-cycle.
They’re both configured as emitter-
followers, so they provide roughly
unity voltage gain. They do, though,
provide considerable current gain,
with high input impedances. A highgain driver stage can take the millivolt-
level signal from a radio’s demodulator and amplify it up to speaker levels, with the output pair matching the
low-impedance speaker load.
In detail, audio from the volume
control enters the circuit via coupling
capacitor C16, arriving at the base of
preamplifier/driver transistor Q4. Q4’s
collector current, flowing via D2 and
R13, becomes the driving voltage for
Q5/Q6. Their emitters (via R14 and
R15) connect together to drive the
speaker via C20.
The circuit is able to deliver almost
the entire supply voltage (as a peak-topeak AC signal) to the speaker, around
8V peak-to-peak in this circuit. A quick
calculation gives a potential output
power of around 200mW into this set’s
40W speaker.
It’s important that the circuit is
biased correctly. This demands a quiescent (idling) current of a few milliamperes in Q5/Q6, temperature compensation to ensure that Q5/Q6 do not
enter destructive thermal runaway at
high temperatures, and that the Q5/
Q6 emitters set close to half the supply voltage, to allow maximum undistorted output, ie, equal magnitude positive and negative half-cycles.
The quiescent current is set by the
base-to-base voltage of Q5/Q6. Diode
D2 is designed for a breakdown voltage of just about 1.2V, which is roughly
twice the normal Vbe for silicon transistors. D2 also has a negative temperature coefficient (NTC). As the ambient
temperature rises, D2’s forward voltage will fall, compensating for the 2
× -2.5mV/°C fall in Q5/Q6’s total Vbe.
For the emitter voltages of Q5/Q6,
we need to look at the DC feedback
path via 560kW resistor R12. For example, a rise in the emitter voltages will
supply more bias current (via R12)
to Q4. This will raise Q4’s collector
current, drawing its collector voltage
down and lowering Q5/Q6’s emitter
voltages.
Fig.2: the circuit of my red set is
different again, with most of the
transistors having different polarities
than in the yellow set!
Australia's electronics magazine
July 2026 97
A fall in the emitter voltages of Q5/
Q6 would result in less bias for Q4,
allowing the circuit to send the Q5/Q6
emitters higher. It’s a simple feedback
loop that stabilises the entire amplifier’s DC conditions.
The final problem is to get enough
voltage swing at the bases of Q5 & Q6.
They need several milliamperes of
base current to deliver full current
into the speaker at signal peaks
(the speaker current divided
by their hfe figures). Pulling
the bases down to switch Q6
on hard is easy; Q4 can readily pull Q6’s base to ground
and supply many milliamps
of base current.
Pulling up seems harder. Let’s
send Q4 to cutoff. Now, Q5’s base
is fed via 820W resistor R13. Assuming we need about 2mA base current
to bias Q5 fully on, we’ll get a drop
of around 2V across R13. If only we
could supply R13 from a higher voltage than the battery.
That’s the job of R13’s connection
to the speaker. With no signal, this
point will be at around 9V. As the Q5/
Q6 emitters start to swing positive,
so will the speaker voltage. But the
speaker is already at 9V, so the positive half-cycle will see the speaker
connection increase above 9V on the
signal’s positive peaks.
In theory, this point can get to
The R-72 and R-72S share the same
dial and case. Apart from the
colour, the only other external
difference is on the nameplate.
around 13V. So that means that the
voltage drop across R13 is fairly constant at around 4V. It’s known as a
‘bootstrap’ circuit, based on the principle of pulling oneself up by one’s
bootstraps!
This particular design offers circuit protection; if the speaker is open-
circuit, there’s no DC supply to the top
of R13 and the circuit simply fails to
operate.
Restoration
Confusingly, a very recent search
on Radiomuseum turned up an R-72S
circuit that shows the RF/IF correctly,
but retains the PNP audio driver! My
advice is to always check any circuit
against the as-built equipment.
Both sets came in acceptable condition, although the red set’s coin slot
had seen excessive force and was a bit
mangled. They both cleaned up nicely
with a spray wash and some automotive polish.
I’ve had the yellow set for some
years now. When I first tried it back
at Harcourt, it failed to impress. I was
Fig.3: the original circuit; it seems like it may be representative of
only a minority of the R-72 sets that were manufactured.
98
Silicon Chip
Australia's electronics magazine
siliconchip.com.au
able to pick up Melbourne stations, but
at less than full gain. I put the lack of
sensitivity down to the small ferrite
rod antenna and the oddball resistance-capacitance coupled IF channel.
But when I started to test the set,
I found that the solder tab connecting the top of the ferrite rod’s tuned
winding had broken, open-circuiting
the connection to the tuning gang and
leaving the antenna circuit completely
untuned. The low sensitivity was one
clue, but I also couldn’t get a peak at
the 600kHz alignment point.
If the antenna circuit was not
being tuned, it would not resonate at
600kHz, so adjusting the LO to maximise the 600kHz sensitivity would be
fruitless. As the antenna circuit would
just be acting as a simple untuned
pickup coil, the set would work about
as poorly no matter the LO frequency.
With that fixed, and with a quick
tweak, 3WV Warrnambool rocked in
at full volume; not bad for a station
over 200km from my previous place
at Rosebud.
The red set was dead, though. No
output, nothing. Connecting my monitor amp to the earphone socket got it
going, and the lack of output was found
to be an open-circuit speaker.
Not expecting to get it rewound
(does anyone repair/rewind three-inch
speakers?), I got a replacement online.
Its diameter was a little smaller than
the original, but I turned a collar using
a circle-cutter on my bench press drill
from an old ice-cream container. That
done, it was onto the test bench for
alignment and performance analysis.
We’ve just moved to Malvern, where
the local levels of EMI even intrude
on 774 ABC Melbourne’s powerful
signal. Taking both Toot-a-Loops for
a walk in the park, though, I was easily able to pull in my favourite 3WV
at full speaker volume, albeit with a
bit of noise.
How good is it?
I was able to test the yellow set at
the standard audio output of 50mW.
The audio response from volume control to speaker is around 220Hz to
4.6kHz; from antenna to speaker, it’s
some 160Hz to 1.1kHz.
Driving the output stage to clipping
gave 150mW at 10% total harmonic
distortion (THD), while the 50mW
output (4.5% THD) and 10mW output
(2.8% THD) are creditable for a Class-B
push-pull output circuit.
siliconchip.com.au
Volume control
Demod
Output
transformer
2nd IFT
Driver
transformer
2nd IF
Output
1st audio
1st IF
1st IFT
Oscillator
coil
Converter
3rd IFT
2nd IF
Volume
control
Demodulator
1st audio
D2
Output
1st IF
2nd IFT
Converter
1st IFT
Oscillator coil
R2
The insides of
both the R-72 and
R-72S with some of the
components labelled.
Australia's electronics magazine
July 2026 99
Some Panasonic history
National Panasonic’s founder, Konosuke Matsushita, was born in 1894 to a
family that fell on hard times. Young Konosuke was forced to leave school at
age nine to find various jobs until he made his first invention, a light socket.
While his product surpassed many others in quality and cost, he found marketing this product very difficult. The experience showed him the need to find
marketing outlets for his products. He formed a strategy that reduced the
energy put into manufacturing in favour of the establishment of a sales force
that led to a retail store network.
His next outing seems equally humble today: a bicycle lamp. Still, it was
battery-powered, making it far superior and much more convenient than his
competitors’ candle- and oil-based offerings.
Matsushita was in danger of being removed as president of National after
the end of WWII. One of General Douglas MacArthur’s strategies to rebuild
the Japanese economy involved breaking up the Zaibatsu (large national corporations).
A 15,000-strong petition from National employees changed MacArthur’s
mind and, in 1947, Matsushita gave brother-in-law Toshio an unutilised manufacturing plant to manufacture bicycle lamps. This company eventually
became Sanyo Electric.
It’s tempting to cast National as the also-ran to Sony, especially given Sony’s
remarkable rise from the ashes of WWII. Against this, we can consider Sony’s
vulnerability as industry leader and the VCR wars of the 1970s and 1980s,
which saw Sony’s Betamax outsold and finally obsoleted despite continuing
improvements that ultimately delivered CD-quality audio.
The competitor to Betamax, Video Home System (VHS), had been developed
by Japan Victor Corporation (JVC) and was strongly supported by National, with
Mitsubishi, Hitachi and Sharp adding their marketing power to the VHS push.
It’s fair to say that Sony’s innovative energy and design flair would always
be challenged by products that, while perhaps not the cutting edge of technology, were sound, reliable and well-marketed. And the leader of that group
was Matsushita’s company, National.
The Panasonic
“Toot-a-Loop”
radio could rotated
into a ring, which was
designed to be wrapped
around your wrist. And all it needed
was a single 9V battery or two AAs.
100
Silicon Chip
The set needed 140μV/m at 600kHz
and 110μV/m at 1400kHz for signal+noise:noise (S+N:N) ratios of
18dB and 13dB, respectively.
For 20dB S+N:N, the levels
were both 190mV/m. AGC control was as expected for a single
stage: a signal rise of around
+30dB gave an output rise of
+6dB.
Selectivity was ±2.3kHz for
-3dB down and ±44kHz for
-60dB. The skirt selectivity,
especially, is very wide for
a transistor set of this era,
confirming the reduced
selectivity expected
from the use of only
two IF transformers. Selectivity
reduction is also
increased by R9
shunting of ITF2’s
primary.
As for the red set,
its unusual two-stage AGC
showed very early onset, needing
an artificially high signal to get to the
Australia's electronics magazine
standard 50mW output. Accordingly,
I tested at 10mW output, so all measurements on the diagram are for a
10mW output.
The audio response from volume
control to speaker is around 125Hz
to 2.7kHz; from antenna to speaker,
it’s about 65Hz to 1.7kHz, although
the unusually low bass response is
wasted with the tiny speaker. The top
end of just 2.7kHz seems low for an
output-transformer-less (OTL) design,
but 22nF capacitor C18, connected
from Q4’s collector to ground, gives
a significant amount of top cut.
Driving the output stage to clipping
gave 150mW at 10% total harmonic
distortion (THD), while the 50mW
output (2% THD) and 10mW output
(3% THD) show the value of a well-
designed OTL circuit.
RF performance was also creditable;
noting that I tested at 10mW audio
output, the set needed 75μV/m at
600kHz and 120μV/m at 1400kHz for
S+N:N ratios of 8dB and 7dB, respectively. Without the early-onset AGC,
these should have equated to about
170μV/m and 270μV/m, respectively,
for 50mW out.
In reality, the red set needed
450μV/m and 550μV/m to achieve
50mW. Despite the two-stage AGC,
the input change for a +6dB rise was
only about +30dB, the same as for the
single-AGC stage design.
Selectivity was ±1.6kHz for -3dB
and ±12kHz for -60dB.
Would I buy another?
I could keep going and get the complete set. It’s a striking example of
packaging; take a popular commodity
that’s gotten a bit ho-hum and wrap it
inside an exciting, attractive case that
makes it stand out from the pack.
My research turned up the R-72,
R-72S and Wadley RF-72 FM version from South Africa. There’s also
the identical AM R-720 from Citizen
Electronics. For a vividly ‘interesting’
design, hop onto Radiomuseum and
look for the JVC Balance (8008).
Special handling
When replacing batteries, take your
time and be kind to the coin slot.
For more information on this series
of radios, visit the following Radiomuseum links:
R-72(S): siliconchip.au/link/acb1
RF-72: siliconchip.au/link/acb2
8008: siliconchip.au/link/acb3 SC
siliconchip.com.au
|