This is only a preview of the July 2026 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 37 of the 104 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Items relevant to "Adjustable Ultrasonic Cleaner":
Items relevant to "Phenomenal Pinball Machine, Part 2":
Items relevant to "DCC Accessory Decoders":
Items relevant to "I2C Controller":
Purchase a printed copy of this issue for $14.00. |
Feature By Andrew Woodfield
Making simple & good-loºking
boxes
If you are anything like me, you make all sorts
of electronic stuff. When I show off my latest
creation, an attractive-looking device with a few
pretty lights always gets a more positive response than my
rough, lashed-up designs on unetched PCBs.
T
he final step of creating a new electronic device typically involves
finding a box to suit it as it’s nearing
completion. It’s a Goldilocks moment,
except that I usually find absolutely
nothing is quite the right size. I might
buy something, only to change the
design and then discover that it no
longer fits in that expensive box!
Frequently, I just need a simple box.
One well-known approach is to lasercut something from thin birch ply (see
Photo 1 above). You can also use this
approach with acrylic sheets. Designing and fabricating these boxes is easy,
particularly with help from the many
free online design tools.
These types of boxes are instantly
recognisable; it’s the dark and light
crenulated edges that are the giveaway.
Frankly, that appearance is sometimes
seen as less than ‘professional’, even
if the electronics within are a marvel
of design.
An alternative is 3D printing. This
approach is great in many cases,
especially for unusually shaped prototypes. However, 3D prints can take an
appreciable amount of time to design,
and often even more time to print.
I recently needed to make several
boxes, the first for a version of an HF
receiver, and the second for a small,
short-range, low-power SSB transmitter. In both cases, I was looking for a
quick solution while also delivering
an attractive appearance.
The receiver I was testing was built
by Charles Kosina (April 2026 issue;
siliconchip.au/Article/20079). The
electronics are all mounted on a PCBtype front panel. It is designed to allow
the receiver to be mounted in an offthe-shelf plastic box. However, try as
I might, I couldn’t find that box or a
suitable equivalent locally. Faced with
this problem, and wanting to get the
receiver into a box quickly to allow
testing, I looked for other options.
Solution one
The first solution I came up with,
Fig.1: the cross-section of
the 3D-printed rails
used in the first
of these simple
enclosures.
66
Silicon Chip
Australia's electronics magazine
shown in Photo 2, was surprisingly
simple. In this approach, four corner
rails are 3D-printed in lengths (and
colours) of your choice. For this first
enclosure, I made my rails 50mm long.
In hindsight, they were probably about
10mm too short, and things got a bit
tight inside.
I slotted in a set of small rectangular ply panels cut from 2mm basswood
ply sheets. That shape, along with
the selected material, permits very
fast and easy cutting. Being simple
rectangles, they can be cut by hand
with a metal ruler and a sharp craft
knife or, as I did, with a laser cutter.
One feature of this type of enclosure
is that the burnt laser-cut edges are
completely hidden.
While the ply thickness was quoted
as 2mm according to the label, the
material actually measured 1.6mm,
so that was the thickness I used in the
corner rail design. I double-checked
this again on several other sheets from
another retailer, and I found the same
result. A third retailer, however, had
2mm sheets that were 2.1mm thick.
Clearly, some variation exists in the
industry.
The cross-section of these rails along
with a 3D view is shown in Fig.1. The
holes were dimensioned to suit M3
hardware.
With the 6.5mm thickness from the
rails on each panel edge plus 0.5mm
for the materials, a total allowance
of 14mm is used when designing the
panels.
However, the back panel of the case
requires no such allowance, and thus
siliconchip.com.au
▶
Photo 2 (left): Charles Kosina’s HF receiver needed
an alternative enclosure solution prior to bench
testing when the specified enclosure could not be
located locally.
Photo 1 (lead): while easy
to design and make, the
appearance of many lasercut boxes does not reflect the
excellence of the electronics inside.
has identical dimensions to that of the
front panel.
The HF receiver’s front panel measured 160 × 65mm. I cut the following
panels directly from the “2mm” ply
using a laser cutter:
∎ Top & bottom panels: 2 <at> 146 ×
50mm
∎ Left & right panels: 2 <at> 51 × 50mm
∎ Back panel: 1 <at> 160 × 65mm
I used PC-based drawing software
to create the outline of the back panel.
This allowed me to precisely dimension and locate the holes for the DC
power supply and the RCA phono-type
antenna connector that I used with the
receiver. The next version will add
a 3.5mm speaker connector and an
accessory connector for the optional
colour LCD screen.
I used CorelDraw to design this
panel and to convert it to a suitable format for my laser cutter. However, there
are many possible design packages,
including free ones (eg, Inkscape).
At a pinch, the drawing functions in
standard office productivity software
could also be used.
During assembly, I gently sanded the
edges of the panels that were inserted
into the corner rails. While the drawing (Fig.1) shows sharp right-angle corners in the base of the slots, when 3D
printed, there was a very slight rounding on the corners at the bottom of the
slots. Sanding the edges with 180-grit
sandpaper very lightly allowed the
panels to fit precisely into place.
I initially planned to use 6mm-long
self-tapping cheesehead screws to
hold everything in place. However,
siliconchip.com.au
Photo 3 (above): a smaller enclosure with curved edges.
my elderly 3D printer ended up producing slightly undersized holes in the
rails. I found some M3 hex bolts in my
parts bin instead and tapped the holes
in the rails to match.
Incidentally, I designed and
3D-printed all the front panel knobs.
This provided a neat overall appearance but, more importantly, it allowed
me to use a set of knobs that fitted
nicely into the available panel space.
A second option
I then designed a second smaller
enclosure for a very small low-power
SSB transmitter, this time an enclosure using rails with curved edges.
The box, shown in Photo 3, measured
120 × 25 × 55mm. The small transmitter PCB and a 9V battery fit inside
this little box.
The new rails I designed for this
enclosure were slightly smaller and
subsequently faster to print (see Fig.2).
The panels were equally fast to cut,
again from 2mm ply, and the assembly
was completed in just a few minutes.
This time, I used 10mm-long self-
tapping screws.
While smaller overall, a total allowance of 10mm is used with the panels
and these rails. For this enclosure with
its 120 × 25mm front and back panels,
the dimensions of the remaining ply
panels were:
∎ Top & bottom panels: 2 <at> 110 ×
55mm
∎ Left & right panels: 2 <at> 15 × 55mm
Available files
The industry standard STL files for
the two rail styles described here are
available for download from the Silicon Chip website at siliconchip.au/
Shop/6/3577
These can be lengthened or shortened using settings in most 3D ‘slicers’. These slicers drive the 3D printer
based on the content of the STL files.
Just prior to printing the file, the user
can adjust several features of the final
output, including scaling each axis.
Fig.2: the rail
cross-section
used in Photo 3.
Australia's electronics magazine
July 2026 67
Ideal Bridge Rectifiers
Choose from six Ideal Diode Bridge
Rectifier kits to build: siliconchip.
com.au/Shop/?article=16043
28mm spade (SC6850, $30)
Compatible with KBPC3504
10A continuous (20A peak),
72V
Connectors: 6.3mm spade
lugs, 18mm tall
IC1 package: MSOP-12
(SMD)
Mosfets: TK6R9P08QM,RQ (DPAK)
21mm square pin (SC6851, $30)
Compatible with PB1004
10A continuous (20A peak),
72V
Connectors: solder pins on
a 14mm grid (can be bent
to a 13mm grid)
IC1 package: MSOP-12
Mosfets: TK6R9P08QM,RQ
5mm pitch SIL (SC6852, $30)
Compatible with KBL604
10A continuous (20A peak), 72V
Connectors: solder pins at
5mm pitch
IC1 package: MSOP-12
Mosfets: TK6R9P08QM,RQ
mini SOT-23 (SC6853, $25)
Width of W02/W04
2A continuous, 40V
Connectors: solder
pins 5mm apart
at either end
IC1 package: MSOP-12
Mosfets: SI2318DS-GE3 (SOT-23)
D2PAK standalone (SC6854, $35)
20A continuous, 72V
Connectors: 5mm screw
terminals at each end
IC1 package:
MSOP-12
Mosfets:
IPB057N06NATMA1
(D2PAK)
TO-220 standalone (SC6855, $45)
40A continuous,
72V
Connectors:
6.3mm spade lugs,
18mm tall
IC1 package: DIP-8
Mosfets:
TK5R3E08QM,S1X
(TO-220)
See our article
in the December
2023 issue for more details:
siliconchip.au/Article/16043
68
Silicon Chip
Alternative panel materials
The files corresponding to Figs.1
& 2 can also be used with panels cut
from 1mm-thick (18 gauge) aluminium
sheets available from several electronics retailers. I’ve also included two
additional STL rails files for use with
0.5mm-thick (24 gauge) aluminium
panels. These are more commonly
found at building supply retailers.
The 0.5mm sheets can be cut with
heavy-duty domestic scissors in situations where access to a metal guillotine is not available. The front and
back panels in either of the examples
here can also be replaced by aluminium panels without any changes to
other parts of the enclosures.
The panels may also be made from
thick card in cases where designers
are uncertain about the final size or
placement of parts on the enclosure
(and we’ve all been there!). This is also
an option for those on a limited budget. By applying inkjet-printed paper
labels covered with self-
a dhesive
transparent film to the front and rear
panels, a fairly robust and quite professional finish can be achieved.
If panels are made from PCB material, these are usually 1.5-1.6mm thick
and therefore nicely match the first
set of rails.
Adhesives
Once all the panels are slotted and
screwed together, they will all stay
locked in place without the need for
any adhesive. During prototyping,
when you may wish to leave some of
the panels off, such as the top cover
and back panel, it may be necessary to
use a drop of hot glue here and there
to keep everything in place.
If the panel thickness varies significantly from the slot width, a little
adhesive may be required to prevent
the panels from vibrating, particularly if that panel is used for mounting a speaker.
Different enclosure sizes
The enclosure dimensions can be
altered to suit individual requirements. Just keep in mind the allowance
required for the rails when dimensioning the panels.
Let’s use the curved rails to demonstrate this. As designed in the STL
files, these are 55mm long. You may,
for example, want an enclosure that
measures 60 × 35 × 50mm, as shown
in Fig.3. The rails can be printed at a
Australia's electronics magazine
Fig.3: an example of a differentlysized enclosure.
Z-scale of 50/55 or 91% to produce
rails with the same cross-section but
lengths of 50mm.
Remember that these rails add 5mm
to the left, right, top and bottom edges
of the ply panels. So, for this new
enclosure with its 60 × 35mm front
and back panels, the dimensions of
the remaining panels would be:
∎ Top & bottom panels: 2 <at> 50 ×
50mm
∎ Left & right panels: 2 <at> 25 × 50mm
3D printing & laser-cutting
services
3D printer and laser cutting services
are now available for those who do not
own such equipment. The first place to
check is local public libraries. Over the
past decade, many have begun hosting technology services, and facilities
often include this type of equipment.
Some also provide classes, and
many provide a maker service, offering
printing and cutting for a very modest fee. In the case of our city libraries,
the charges for 3D printing are usually
based on the item’s weight in addition
to a small setup fee, and availability of
the finished item is often very prompt.
Failing this, some companies also
provide a fee-based printing and cutting service, although these are likely
to be slightly more expensive.
Final comments
This simple, fast, and low-cost
approach to making enclosures has
allowed me to dramatically improve
the final appearance of some of my
designs. It delivers a modern professional finish and, importantly, avoids
the often distracting appearance of
dark and light laser-cut edges on these
boxes.
It’s also very easy to modify the basic
components presented here to cater for
a wide range of requirements. Armed
with this approach, I feel this solution
is certain to also find a use around your
SC
workshop, too.
siliconchip.com.au
|