This is only a preview of the July 2025 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 37 of the 104 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Articles in this series:
Articles in this series:
Items relevant to "The SmartProbe":
Articles in this series:
Items relevant to "Hot Water System Solar Diverter, part two":
Items relevant to "Low-cost electronic modules: 8×16 LED Matrix module":
Items relevant to "SSB Shortwave Receiver, part 2":
Purchase a printed copy of this issue for $13.00. |
SILICON
SILIC
CHIP
www.siliconchip.com.au
Publisher/Editor
Nicholas Vinen
Technical Editor
John Clarke – B.E.(Elec.)
Technical Staff
Bao Smith – B.Sc.
Tim Blythman – B.E., B.Sc.
Advertising Enquiries
(02) 9939 3295
adverts<at>siliconchip.com.au
Regular Contributors
Allan Linton-Smith
Dave Thompson
David Maddison – B.App.Sc. (Hons 1),
PhD, Grad.Dip.Entr.Innov.
Geoff Graham
Associate Professor Graham Parslow
Dr Hugo Holden – B.H.B, MB.ChB.,
FRANZCO
Ian Batty – M.Ed.
Phil Prosser – B.Sc., B.E.(Elec.)
Cartoonist
Louis Decrevel
loueee.com
Founding Editor (retired)
Leo Simpson – B.Bus., FAICD
Silicon Chip is published 12 times
a year by Silicon Chip Publications
Pty Ltd. ACN 626 922 870. ABN 20
880 526 923. All material is copyright ©. No part of this publication
may be reproduced without the written
consent of the publisher.
Subscription rates (Australia only)
6 issues (6 months): $70
12 issues (1 year):
$130
24 issues (2 years):
$245
Online subscription (Worldwide)
6 issues (6 months): $52.50
12 issues (1 year):
$100
24 issues (2 years):
$190
For overseas rates, see our website or
email silicon<at>siliconchip.com.au
* recommended & maximum price only
Postal address: PO Box 194,
Matraville, NSW 2036.
Phone: (02) 9939 3295.
ISSN: 1030-2662
Printing and Distribution:
9 Kendall Street, Granville NSW 2142
2
Silicon Chip
Editorial Viewpoint
Confusion between lithium
battery types
It has become very common for people to refer to
lithium-ion batteries as “lithium batteries”, but that is
confusing since lithium metal batteries existed before
lithium-ion batteries were invented, and they are quite
different.
The term “lithium battery” used to specifically refer
to a disposable battery that used lithium metal as the
anode. These have been around since the 1970s and are still widely used in
applications where long shelf life and high energy density are important, such
as memory backup, smoke alarms and small medical devices.
They come in various chemistries, like lithium-manganese dioxide, lithium-
thionyl chloride, lithium-iron disulfide, and so on. Those all share one critical
feature: they are not rechargeable.
In contrast, lithium-ion batteries are rechargeable and use a lithium compound rather than metallic lithium. The lithium atoms give up an electron to
become positively charged ions, which move between compounds in the electrodes during charging and discharging – hence the name.
Though their chemistry is more complex and sensitive than lithium-metal
batteries, their energy density and rechargeability have made them the dominant choice for everything from phones to electric vehicles.
In fact, what we call “lithium-ion batteries” is a whole family of different
chemistries with similar, but not identical, properties. Common lithium-ion
chemistry variants include lithium cobalt oxide (LiCoO2), lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide (LiNiMnCoO2), lithium nickel cobalt aluminium oxide
(LiNiCoAlO2), lithium manganese oxide (LiMn2O4) and lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4).
You may be familiar with that last one because it has more significantly different properties from most of the others, such as a lower terminal voltage, plus
better tolerance for over-charging and over-discharging.
Getting back to my main point, why the confusion between lithium-ion and
lithium batteries? Somewhere along the line, “lithium-ion battery” got shortened; first in casual conversation, then in journalism, and now even in marketing. The problem is that “lithium battery” still means something else in
technical contexts.
The distinction especially matters in transport: postal and courier rules, particularly for air freight, can differ significantly between lithium and lithium-ion
batteries. It doesn’t help that many consumer devices now include vague labels
like “contains lithium battery”, even on products that clearly use lithium-ion
cells. This ends up muddying the waters for everyone else.
The distinction is especially important when it comes to charging. Try to
charge a non-rechargeable lithium battery and you’re asking for trouble. The
internal chemistry isn’t designed to handle reverse current, and the result can
be catastrophic: swelling, leakage, or even fire.
It is not just theoretical; there have been fires caused by consumers mistakenly trying to recharge lithium primary cells, often due to this exact terminological conflation.
We all sometimes refer to a cell as “a battery” when (arguably) batteries contain more than one cell, but that’s a minor point. Not so the distinction between
lithium and lithium-ion batteries.
So let’s make a collective effort to be more precise. Use the term “lithium-
ion” (or even better, the specific chemistry) to refer to rechargeable batteries.
If you’re referring to a lithium-metal primary cell, it’s best to be explicit, but
if you must call anything a “lithium battery”, it should be those types only.
Cover Image: Steve Jurvetson – www.flickr.com/photos/
jurvetson/8065095602/in/album-72157608597030651/ (CC BY 2.0)
Australia's electronics magazine
by Nicholas Vinen
siliconchip.com.au
|