This is only a preview of the June 2026 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 43 of the 104 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Articles in this series:
Items relevant to "Phenomenal Pinball Machine, Part 1":
Items relevant to "Human Comfort Indicator":
Items relevant to "Simple USB Power Monitor":
Items relevant to "Micropower SSB Transmitter":
Purchase a printed copy of this issue for $14.00. |
SERVICEMAN’S LOG
Music to my ears
Dave Thompson
It may seem obvious to many regular readers that I am ‘into’ music.
Or perhaps it isn’t that obvious, but rest assured, I am into it! So, not
surprisingly, a lot of the gear I’ve fixed over the years has been related to
musical instruments and hifi equipment.
I both listen to and play music, and I have done so since I
was eight years old, when I was taught piano by an elderly
Hungarian Jewish man who lived just around the corner.
He was a very good player and a very good teacher. He had
some stories to tell about the war years – which were likely
heavily sanitised for my tender young ears!
Sadly, he passed away a few years after I started, so I
changed teachers. That killed my piano-playing career. What
it did teach me is that having the right teacher is crucial.
While I still play instruments today, I don’t play any of
them anywhere near as much as I used to, or should.
As for listening to music, I have my favourites, of course,
but am not averse to listening to anything new coming along.
I know what I like (usually within seconds of starting), so
these days I stick with what I know, or I check out recommendations from others I know who have similar tastes
(that includes some of the folks producing this magazine).
All that said, I am definitely not one of those guys with
a library-sized collection of vinyl, playing them on an
audiophile-
level home audio system.
You know
80
Silicon Chip
the ones, with those thousand-dollar-per-metre speaker
cables made from unobtanium and Mars dust.
My earliest dabbling in electronics – with a lot of help
and encouragement from my dad – was with simple oscillators, crystal radio sets and very basic amplifiers. It fast
became a keen interest, and the more I got into it, the more
I saw music-related potential.
I don’t think I was alone with these interests either, if
the number of music-related projects in the magazines of
the day was anything to go by. I took it as a sure sign that
others were as keen as I was, and I was proven right.
There was even a relatively short-lived magazine out of
England that featured just that: electronics, current music
technology and really cool projects for musicians. I have
every copy stored away somewhere, but there weren’t that
many with that first-generation theme before it morphed
into something that wasn’t of much interest to me. Publishing is tough in any field, time period, or country!
It seemed every month, one magazine or another would
have an interesting music project. I must have built many
dozens of them (mostly on prototype boards); some useful,
some just gimmicks. Still, it was all educational and much
grist for my mill back then.
Making projects kept me busy while I should have been
practising, but I had a lot to learn, and so I was very eager
to do both as much as I could.
I saved all my newspaper delivery money (then my parttime after-school job earnings) to buy these magazines and
then the relevant components for projects. I still have
large stacks of the mags in storage (and components!).
Sadly, the magazines will likely end up in the recycling bin if I can’t give them away.
I’ve seen many people trying to pass on complete
collections of magazines and libraries worth of books
over the years, but the modern age, with much of it digitised retroactively anyway, what’s the point in keeping
vast collections, other than just that – collecting them? It
seems such a waste, but it’s just reality.
Years ago, as a wee tacker, I made everything from tone
boosters, fuzz boxes, wah pedals and metronomes until,
after a while, I was making increasingly complex projects such as my own stereo amps, preamps, full-blown
PA amps, speaker cabinets, mixing consoles, guitar/bass/
keyboard amps, microphones, wireless systems and guitars themselves.
I wanted to be able to record music at home, on a computer, and that’s where this music rabbit-hole led me.
Australia's electronics magazine
siliconchip.com.au
Back in those days, the go-to home recording device, if
you could afford one, was something like a Tascam or a
Fostex four-track, which recorded onto standard cassette
tapes. They were pretty good for their day, but as we know,
cassette tapes aren’t the best for audio quality, especially
if they were used to ‘dub’ or ‘bounce’ many tracks down
into one track a few times.
The step up from there was into a reel-to-reel four-track or,
if you owned a corporation, an eight-track reel-to-reel that
used half-inch tape. They had much better audio quality.
Fun fact: The Beatles’ album Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts
Club Band was recorded on just two Studer J37 four-track
recorders (using one-inch tape), synched together electronically by audio engineers, at what later became Abbey
Road Studios. This shows what could be accomplished in
1966 with some very good gear and much lateral creative
thinking, producing and mixing.
Those cassette-based four-track recording machines
were very much a 1980s child and, as they were relatively
affordable, they launched the imaginations of many and
the possibility of a viable home recording studio.
All was well then, but recording at home is not just a
matter of grabbing some digital audio workstation (DAW)
software from the interwebs, plugging in your microphone,
keyboard or guitar to your computer and laying down a
new number-one hit single.
While you’d think that the computer already has analog
inputs to allow instrument/microphone/line connections,
the CPU has to work hard to crunch that signal into a digital
form so the computer can process, store and manipulate it.
You might be surprised to know that most built-in
‘sound cards’ - while most are built onto the motherboard
now, people still call them sound cards – are pretty much
useless for doing any studio-level sound processing. Yes,
they can record speech and basic mic audio, but there are
inherent problems.
For example, if you want to monitor recorded audio
through headphones while multitracking, there is a delay
between input and output signals as the computer struggles to keep up. This is called latency and makes onboard
sound unsuitable for multitrack recording, where there
must be minimal latency between in and output signals.
So, an external sound interface is usually the way to go.
These typically connect via USB or Thunderbolt, operating
similarly to an accelerated graphics card in that the interface handles all the audio heavy-lifting for the computer.
To do this, a special driver is needed, called an ASIO
driver (Audio Stream Input/Output). This was developed
by the Steinberg company in the late 1990s specifically to
Items Covered This Month
• Musical instruments and USB ASIO card repair
• Repairing a Simpson Contessa washing machine
• A powerless Li-ion charger
• Small replacements for a Dyson fan
• Fixing a Samsung TV
Dave Thompson runs PC Anytime in Christchurch, NZ.
Website: www.pcanytime.co.nz
Email: dave<at>pcanytime.co.nz
Cartoonist – Louis Decrevel
Website: loueee.com
siliconchip.com.au
reduce latency and allow the processing of multiple concurrent audio streams.
Usually, these drivers are supplied with the interface, or
available as a download or, at a push, a generic freeware
ASIO driver. Interfaces cost anywhere from under a hundred bucks to several thousand, depending on what you
want. My Line 6 Toneport UX2 is almost vintage now, yet
still cost me 500 bucks second-hand in 2003. It still works
perfectly for my needs – or it did until recently.
It is connected permanently to my PC and acts as a normal sound card when just listening to music or watching
YouTube, but it’s when all the audio inputs are utilised
with a DAW that we really see and hear the difference.
The problem now is its age. All the pots are scratchy, some
of the sockets are intermittent, and it is just not right. So I
decided that it was finally time to do something about it.
The beauty of this era of music gear is that it really is
‘analog’ and it was designed with repair in mind. Typically,
clamshell plastic or metal cases were screwed together with
normal screws, meaning easy disassembly. All the sockets
utilised in most pedals and music gear are standard components, most of which are still available.
However, this unit is interesting in a few different ways.
Disassembling it was odd from the start; after turning it over
multiple times (no doubt with a puzzled look on my face),
I simply couldn’t see how it was held together. There are
no obvious screws underneath. I even popped one of the
four glued-on rubber feet off to check for hidden screws
(as is typical of many laptops) but I found none.
I thought maybe that the four rotary controls (two independent mic input gains, headphones volume and output
level) located on the top half of the case might actually be
holding it all together. However, when I popped the knobs
off, I saw that Line6 had simply extended the pot shafts up
through the top of the case, so they actually didn’t hold
down anything at all. Interesting...
It turns out there are no screws and no clips; just a friction fit that holds the top half of the case to the bottom,
although the front and back panels also play a vital part.
Australia's electronics magazine
June 2026 81
It’s always a little scary when applying pressure to something that might be clipped or screwed (oh for a small X-ray
machine!) but it eventually let go and eased apart with gently increasing pressure.
This left the top of the PCB exposed, with the front and
back panels still engaged in a slot that runs around the
edges of both halves of the case. It’s a purposely tight fit
and, when the case is assembled, it all holds itself together.
Given that this is designed to sit on a desk and not go on
the road, this is an elegant (and likely cheaper) way of
holding it all together.
Both the front and back panels are an odd but very cleverly implemented two-layer lamination. These consist of
the screen-printed, outward-facing coloured fascia, and
behind it, a very thin metal laminate, which is no doubt
added for shielding and grounding. Between them, they
fill the slot around the case edge perfectly, with a pleasing, ever-so-snug interference fit.
It has obviously been carefully thought out by the designers and well-implemented by the manufacturers (what we
pay the bigger dollars for, I suppose).
The back panel is held onto the PCB by a raft of 6.35mm
82
Silicon Chip
(¼-inch) jack sockets and a sole RCA socket. These are
the line in, footswitch, S/PDIF and analog output sockets.
I never use those anyway, except for the USB connector
(which utilises the older, but still widely used USB-B type
connector), so I left that panel alone; there was no point
in taking it off.
The multi-layer PCB itself is packed with assorted sockets, pots, a couple of backlit, olde-worlde analog VU meters
and what looked to be about a million SMD components
distributed in between the bigger parts. I decided to remove
the front panel, mainly for easier access to some of the sockets and switches that live right behind it.
The PCB was held to the panel by the barrel nuts and
black plastic washers of three 6.35mm jack sockets and four
(surprisingly long) machine screws holding on to two Canon
XLR sockets. Both socket types are the universal standard
for plugging instruments and microphones into audio gear.
There are two guitar inputs (one normal and one ‘padded’
for hotter inputs) and a headphone jack output. Removing the barrel nuts on the jacks exposes some interesting,
thick, multi-pinned plastic locating washers that hold the
jack sockets fast into the front panel without any risk of
Australia's electronics magazine
siliconchip.com.au
the socket turning (as often happens with chassis mounted
versions of these same sockets), as shown in the photo.
More importantly, this locking system prevents the transference of any cable pressure or tension directly onto the
fragile PCB. One common mistake I’ve made myself many
times before is to forget I’m plugged into something and
walk away, blissfully unaware that when the length of the
cable runs out, some huge stresses are going to be inflicted
on those poor sockets at either end.
I’ve done this with power tools, laptops, mobile phones,
headphones and guitars. We’ve likely all done it!
The two XLR connectors are solely for microphone inputs
and have two screws per socket. The only other control
on the front panel is a push-on/push-off phantom power
switch for sending 48V DC to the microphones (if needed).
They must have a decent DC/DC converter in there to
take 5V from USB and be able to send 48V (admittedly only
up to a maximum of 10mA of current) to power up to two
connected active microphones.
Once it was all open, I sat it on a plastic box, plugged the
USB cable into my workshop computer, and my headphones
into the output to monitor what was happening. Then I
worked on the potentiometers. All four were scratchy and
felt gritty, so I gave them a good squirt of contact cleaner
while rotating them from end to end, making sure the entire
track got a decent wet wipe.
They quietened down a lot, and as there is no obvious
dust inside the interface, it was likely worn pot track debris.
I gave them another few blasts once this lot had dried.
I moved on to the jack sockets. These are mostly enclosed
by hard plastic mouldings, so getting access to the contacts inside was a problem. The barrel nuts on the outside
of the socket are easy enough to tickle up, as they need to
be taken off anyway, but I replaced them before cleaning.
If these ferrules aren’t electrically clean, there’s not a lot
of point doing the rest.
What I needed was a means of cleaning the contacts inside,
at least where jack plugs would touch. To this end, I took
a timber dowel and glued very fine (1200 grit) wet and dry
sandpaper around it, making it a snug fit inside the socket.
After spraying the sandpaper with contact cleaner, a few
gentle ins-and-outs and a twist or two cleaned the relevant
surfaces, at least as much as I wanted to use abrasives on
them. Then I blew out any debris after the cleaning rod work
and sprayed with more contact cleaner to flush things out.
Left: a Line
6 Toneport
UX2 audio
interface.
Removing
the barrel
nuts on the
headphone
jacks reveals
multi-pinned
plastic antirotation
washers.
siliconchip.com.au
Australia's electronics magazine
June 2026 83
I repeated this on all the sockets and manually polished anything I could see and access with my diamond
contact file.
I cleaned the XLR connectors (not that I use them) with
a bamboo skewer soaked in contact cleaner. It was the perfect size to fit in the holes in the socket. The probe came
out clean anyway, so I considered that done.
That was about as far as I could go with it. Other than the
pots and sockets, there really are ‘no user-serviceable parts
inside’. The audio tests after that were a lot better, but not
perfect as far as the pots went. However, I wasn’t too keen
on the prospect of desoldering anything from this circuit
board, especially a through-the-board pot.
For the amount of use this device gets now, I can live
with it. At least now I know that if the pots continue to give
me trouble, I can get the device apart easily enough and
replace them. Fingers crossed it doesn’t come to that. The
sockets all seem to be working well now, so I reassembled
everything in reverse order for a final test. All was good,
which was music to my ears!
Simpson Contessa 425 washing machine repair
I refurbished a Simpson Contessa 425 washing machine
about four years ago. Since then, it has worked well. I had
to repair the spin solenoid around two years ago (described
in Serviceman’s Log, October 2022).
Lately, it has been leaking water. This was not a major
drama, as the machine is on the back verandah and the
small amount of water just ran off the concrete onto the
grass. It was more of an annoyance than anything.
I had been meaning to check where the water was leaking,
but every time I noticed it leaking, the machine was in use
with water in it. I finally co-ordinated troubleshooting with
my wife. I needed to pull the machine out and remove the
back panel so that I could see exactly where the leak was.
With the machine pulled out and the back panel removed,
we added some water, and I could see that it was the water
pump that was leaking. Water pumps are one component
that I do have spares of, so I was confident I could find a
replacement.
I recalled that we had previously used a Simpson 7.5kg
machine that was computer controlled. We used it for several years until the computer failed, so that was not economically repairable and it went to the boneyard.
I located the machine and removed the pump. I then
removed the pump from the 425 and compared them; they
were completely different. The original pump was much
longer and had the inlet on the top, whereas the possible
replacement pump was much shorter and it had the inlet
on the end. Therefore, the original drain hose was too short.
But maybe I could use the hose from the 7.5kg machine.
I went back to the boneyard and retrieved the inlet hose.
Then it was time to see if the later-model pump and hose
would fit in the older machine. I first checked to see if the
bolt holes in the pump would line up with the holes in the
back of the machine where the pump mounts.
On the 425, there were four holes for mounting the pump;
two of them lined up with the bolt holes in the replacement pump, so that was OK. After bolting the pump into
the machine, I fitted the inlet hose to the pump and then
to the bowl. It fitted correctly, with plenty of clearance to
the pulley on the bottom of the bowl, so the pump transplant was a success.
I decided to change the outlet hose at the same time, as
the old hose had previously had some leaks in it, which
had been repaired with duct tape. While this had been
successful, I thought that the newer hose looked better, so
I would use it.
I connected the replacement hose to the pump and
noticed that the new hose was a slightly smaller diameter, so I had to change the fitting where the outlet end of
the hose is connected to the grey water disposal pipe, but
that was easy and I then replaced the back panel. With
the machine back in use, there were no more water leaks.
The reason these old pumps leak is that the seal where
the motor shaft enters the pump wears out. This is a special type of seal that is not available as a spare part. I have
previously repaired these old pumps by swapping parts
between them, like swapping a good motor onto a good
pump, but there’s only so much I can do without being
able to obtain spare parts.
Bruce Pierson, Dundathu, Qld.
Ozito QL09009A 5-cell lithium-ion battery charger
The original (longer) Simpson Contessa 425 washing
machine pump is shown above. The replacement pump is
below, with the inlet located at the end.
84
Silicon Chip
This Ozito battery charger had no output. It is a conventional flyback design using an AP8263 IC. The secondary
side has an LM358 dual op amp that monitors the charging
current and alters the drive to the feedback optocoupler to
vary the output voltage of the charger.
Australia's electronics magazine
siliconchip.com.au
From left-to-right: the AM05 & AM07 motor control boards; a brushless DC hair dryer motor; the drive signal from this
hair dryer motor.
There is a P-channel Mosfet in series with the output,
which was not being switched on, hence the lack of output.
There is also an unmarked 8-pin IC that seems to monitor
the battery charging and drives a three-pin LED, giving a
red or green light. Another output of this IC drives an NPN
transistor that should switch on the Mosfet.
I decided that the mystery IC was faulty, so I forced the
Mosfet on by shorting out the NPN transistor. That got the
charger working again. I assume the Mosfet was supposed to
be turned off if the charging current got too high or charging
took too long. It would help if the IC could be identified.
Roger Sanderson, Fig Tree Pocket, Qld.
Dyson bladeless fan faults (AM05 & AM07)
The brushless DC motor circuit drive boards in these
Dyson fans use a Power Integrations LNK304D buck regulator to produce 15V or 5V for the control ICs from the 350V
DC rectified mains. Unfortunately, this part fails, feeding a
destructive voltage through to the low voltage parts, particularly the microprocessor.
Power Integrations now has an LNK3204D, which hopefully is more reliable.
Replacement boards for these fans cost around $200, so
it is questionable whether it is worth repairing them. Of
course, the microprocessor that holds the software is not
available as a spare part.
I am looking at using an alternative brushless DC motor
control board to power the fans. There are low-cost controller boards available, but they are designed to drive
low-voltage motors. They have a built-in switch-mode
converter to provide a low voltage for the motor and drive
Servicing Stories Wanted
Do you have any good servicing stories that you would like
to share in The Serviceman column in SILICON CHIP? If so,
why not send those stories in to us? It doesn’t matter what
the story is about as long as it’s in some way related to the
electronics or electrical industries, to computers or even to
cars and similar.
We pay for all contributions published but please note that
your material must be original. Send your contribution by
email to: editor<at>siliconchip.com.au
Please be sure to include your full name and address details.
siliconchip.com.au
circuit from the AC mains. To use them, the motor would
also need replacement.
Attached are photos of the AM05 and AM07 control
boards. The AM05 uses an SMA6823 to drive the motor,
while the AM07 uses individual Mosfets.
I am also investigating using a brushless DC hair dryer
motor from AliExpress to replace the motor and driver in
a Dyson bladeless fan.
Note that the drive signal on one of the three phases is
not continuous, but is in bursts. The driver board provides
three levels of airflow. As the airflow is increased, the driver
pulse width increases, but the pulse rate stays the same.
Roger Sanderson, Fig Tree Pocket, Qld.
Samsung TV fixed the IT way
We have a Samsung TV (UA55CU8000) and sound bar
(HW-Q600C). One evening, as my wife settled down to watch
one of her programs while I was occupied in another room,
she called out that the sound was “not working properly”.
When I came to check, I could see that using the remote
would bring up the numerical data on-screen for the volume setting but it was obvious that the volume was not
changing. As a quick fix, I jumped into the TV menu and
enabled the TV speakers while disabling the sound bar. This
worked, seemingly indicating a problem with the sound bar.
The next day, I switched on the TV and re-enabled the
sound bar. The remote still had no effect, but now the volume was changing, slowly upwards, without me doing
anything! As part of my fault-finding process, I decided
to transfer the sound bar to the small TV in the kitchen
and see what happened. Well, of course it worked properly, didn’t it!
I put the sound bar back while glaring sideways at the
now-suspect TV. While I was doing this, the old computer
adage of “Have you tried turning it off and on again?” came
to mind. Since no modern piece of electronics is ever turned
completely ‘off’, I pulled the power cord out of the back of
the TV, waited a while and plugged it in again.
When I turned it on again, everything worked correctly
and has continued to work since. When we thought about
it, earlier that evening we had a momentary mains power
glitch, probably a little less than half a second. This appears
to have addled the TV set’s brain, and a full power reset
got it straightened out again.
SC
Ian Malcolm, Scoresby, Vic.
Australia's electronics magazine
June 2026 85
|