Silicon ChipAUDIO OUT - May 2020 SILICON CHIP
  1. Outer Front Cover
  2. Contents
  3. Subscriptions: PE Subscription
  4. Publisher's Letter: Publisher's Statement
  5. Publisher's Letter
  6. Feature: The Fox Report by Barry Fox
  7. Feature: Techno Talk by Mark Nelson
  8. Feature: Net Work by Alan Winstanley
  9. Project: 433MHz Wireless Data Range Extender by John Clarke
  10. Project: Bridge-mode Audio Amplifier Adaptor by NICHOLAS VINEN
  11. Project: iCEstick by Tim Blythman
  12. Project: Ultra-low-distortion Preamplifier with Tone Controls by John Clarke
  13. Feature: Circuit Surgery by Ian Bell
  14. Feature: PIC n’Mix by Mike Hibbett
  15. Feature: Make it with Micromite by Phil Boyce
  16. Feature: AUDIO OUT by Jake Rothman
  17. Feature: Visual programming with XOD by Julian Edgar
  18. Back Issues by Julian Edgar
  19. Feature: Max’s Cool Beans by Max the Magnificent
  20. PCB Order Form
  21. Advertising Index

This is only a preview of the May 2020 issue of Practical Electronics.

You can view 0 of the 80 pages in the full issue.

Articles in this series:
  • Techno Talk (May 2020)
  • Techno Talk (May 2020)
  • Techno Talk (June 2020)
  • Techno Talk (June 2020)
  • Techno Talk (July 2020)
  • Techno Talk (July 2020)
  • Techno Talk (August 2020)
  • Techno Talk (August 2020)
  • Techno Talk (September 2020)
  • Techno Talk (September 2020)
  • Techno Talk (October 2020)
  • Techno Talk (October 2020)
  • (November 2020)
  • (November 2020)
  • Techno Talk (December 2020)
  • Techno Talk (December 2020)
  • Techno Talk (January 2021)
  • Techno Talk (January 2021)
  • Techno Talk (February 2021)
  • Techno Talk (February 2021)
  • Techno Talk (March 2021)
  • Techno Talk (March 2021)
  • Techno Talk (April 2021)
  • Techno Talk (April 2021)
  • Techno Talk (May 2021)
  • Techno Talk (May 2021)
  • Techno Talk (June 2021)
  • Techno Talk (June 2021)
  • Techno Talk (July 2021)
  • Techno Talk (July 2021)
  • Techno Talk (August 2021)
  • Techno Talk (August 2021)
  • Techno Talk (September 2021)
  • Techno Talk (September 2021)
  • Techno Talk (October 2021)
  • Techno Talk (October 2021)
  • Techno Talk (November 2021)
  • Techno Talk (November 2021)
  • Techno Talk (December 2021)
  • Techno Talk (December 2021)
  • Communing with nature (January 2022)
  • Communing with nature (January 2022)
  • Should we be worried? (February 2022)
  • Should we be worried? (February 2022)
  • How resilient is your lifeline? (March 2022)
  • How resilient is your lifeline? (March 2022)
  • Go eco, get ethical! (April 2022)
  • Go eco, get ethical! (April 2022)
  • From nano to bio (May 2022)
  • From nano to bio (May 2022)
  • Positivity follows the gloom (June 2022)
  • Positivity follows the gloom (June 2022)
  • Mixed menu (July 2022)
  • Mixed menu (July 2022)
  • Time for a total rethink? (August 2022)
  • Time for a total rethink? (August 2022)
  • What’s in a name? (September 2022)
  • What’s in a name? (September 2022)
  • Forget leaves on the line! (October 2022)
  • Forget leaves on the line! (October 2022)
  • Giant Boost for Batteries (December 2022)
  • Giant Boost for Batteries (December 2022)
  • Raudive Voices Revisited (January 2023)
  • Raudive Voices Revisited (January 2023)
  • A thousand words (February 2023)
  • A thousand words (February 2023)
  • It’s handover time (March 2023)
  • It’s handover time (March 2023)
  • AI, Robots, Horticulture and Agriculture (April 2023)
  • AI, Robots, Horticulture and Agriculture (April 2023)
  • Prophecy can be perplexing (May 2023)
  • Prophecy can be perplexing (May 2023)
  • Technology comes in different shapes and sizes (June 2023)
  • Technology comes in different shapes and sizes (June 2023)
  • AI and robots – what could possibly go wrong? (July 2023)
  • AI and robots – what could possibly go wrong? (July 2023)
  • How long until we’re all out of work? (August 2023)
  • How long until we’re all out of work? (August 2023)
  • We both have truths, are mine the same as yours? (September 2023)
  • We both have truths, are mine the same as yours? (September 2023)
  • Holy Spheres, Batman! (October 2023)
  • Holy Spheres, Batman! (October 2023)
  • Where’s my pneumatic car? (November 2023)
  • Where’s my pneumatic car? (November 2023)
  • Good grief! (December 2023)
  • Good grief! (December 2023)
  • Cheeky chiplets (January 2024)
  • Cheeky chiplets (January 2024)
  • Cheeky chiplets (February 2024)
  • Cheeky chiplets (February 2024)
  • The Wibbly-Wobbly World of Quantum (March 2024)
  • The Wibbly-Wobbly World of Quantum (March 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Wait! What? Really? (April 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Wait! What? Really? (April 2024)
  • Techno Talk - One step closer to a dystopian abyss? (May 2024)
  • Techno Talk - One step closer to a dystopian abyss? (May 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Program that! (June 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Program that! (June 2024)
  • Techno Talk (July 2024)
  • Techno Talk (July 2024)
  • Techno Talk - That makes so much sense! (August 2024)
  • Techno Talk - That makes so much sense! (August 2024)
  • Techno Talk - I don’t want to be a Norbert... (September 2024)
  • Techno Talk - I don’t want to be a Norbert... (September 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Sticking the landing (October 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Sticking the landing (October 2024)
  • Techno Talk (November 2024)
  • Techno Talk (November 2024)
  • Techno Talk (December 2024)
  • Techno Talk (December 2024)
  • Techno Talk (January 2025)
  • Techno Talk (January 2025)
  • Techno Talk (February 2025)
  • Techno Talk (February 2025)
  • Techno Talk (March 2025)
  • Techno Talk (March 2025)
  • Techno Talk (April 2025)
  • Techno Talk (April 2025)
  • Techno Talk (May 2025)
  • Techno Talk (May 2025)
  • Techno Talk (June 2025)
  • Techno Talk (June 2025)
  • Techno Talk (July 2025)
  • Techno Talk (July 2025)
AUDIO OUT AUDIO OUT L R By Jake Rothman Noise about noise – a new slant on analogue noise with tilt control – Part 2 L ast month, I introduced my analogue noise generator. This month we will build it, examine its ‘tilt control’ and create a variety of interesting noise-generator-based synthesiser circuits. Tilt tone control I recently described a Baxandall tone control in PE (EPE) April and May 2018 and I thought this would be a suitable place to introduce an intriguing variant of this design, the tilt control. Conceived by R Ambler (Wireless World, March 1970) and later adopted in the Quad 34 pre-amp, this circuit combines Baxandall’s bass and treble controls into a single control. This control is flat when the pot is centred and the frequency response pivots around a mid-point to give boosted treble and cut bass when rotated fully clockwise. When fully anti-clockwise it has the reverse effect of maximum bass boost and maximum treble cut. At intermediate settings of these positions it can give a gentle slope or tilt across the whole audio frequency range. A centre-detent/click pot is ideal if you can get one. Tayda do a 20kΩ one with a W-law (A-1959). To use this, re-scaling of the component values R9 10kΩ R10 10kΩ R8 33kΩ R13 33kΩ CW I np ut f rom C3 on Fig. 8 0V R7 100kΩ C5 4 7 0nF Component list (for the synthesiser version) C1 C2 C3 C4, C7 Semiconductors IC1 TL062 or MCP6002 low-power op amp. For Hi-Fi, use TL072 or a better Bi-Fet (dual) op amp REG1 TL431 C7 2. 7 nF C5, C6 C8 C9 100µF 47µF 22µF 2.7nF (for Hi-Fi 1kHz turnover use 6.8nF polyester) 470nF 10µF 4.7µF 0dB –7.5 20 Hz 50 100 200 500 1k 2k 5k 10k 20k 20 Hz 50 100 200 500 1k 2k 5k 10k 20k R17 560kΩ 6 – 5 + 7 R14 100Ω I C1b B i-Fet (eg, T L06 2) 0V C9 4 .7 µ F O utp ut p in 4 R15 100kΩ +7.5 0dB 0V p in 3 Fig.12. Tilt tone control circuit: this can be thought of as crosscoupled Baxandall bass and treble controls combined in one. 58 Capacitors Dielectric type not critical: ceramic, polyester, electrolytic or tantalum can be used. All 5mm pitch radial. Scale voltage rating according to power supply. If using standard 5V use minimum 6V rating. +7.5 R11 50kΩ Lin C6 4 7 0nF B ias 2. 5V f rom Fig. 8 Resistors (all 0.25W 5% carbon-film) R1, R2 2.2kΩ R3 22kΩ R4 27kΩ (only for 9V or greater power supply) R5 1.5kΩ R6 56kΩ R7, R15 100kΩ R8, R13 33kΩ R9, R10 10kΩ R11 (VR1) 50kΩ lin 16mm vertical PCB mount pot. R12 560kΩ R14 100Ω + C4 2. 7 nF would be required: C4 and C7 would be 5.6nF, R9 and R10 become 4.7kΩ and R8 and R13 are set to 16kΩ. If the control is set to give a downwards tilt, it can be used to give the white noise a pink noise approximation. In theory, this should be –3dB/octave, which needs a more complicated filter, but this tilt control gives a reasonable sonic impression for most musical uses. On full treble tilt it gives a harsh ‘blue’ noise suitable for high-hats and transient sounds. Turned the other way, it gives a lowish roar good for tom-tom sounds. The tilt control circuit is shown in Fig.12; on the PCB this is combined with the noise source in Fig.8 (last month). The frequency response is shown in Fig.13a. Note the pivot-point is 2.5kHz, which gave the best synth effects with the noise. Fig.13b shows the effect of different pot positions. –7.5 Fig.13a. (top) Frequency response of tilt tone control; the ‘pivot’ point is 2.5kHz. Fig.13b shows the effect of different pot positions. Practical Electronics | May | 2020 n NB, VR1 is IC2 Fig.14. PCB overlay for combined noise generator and tilt control Fig.8 and Fig.12). Fig.15. PCB track layout. This is singlesided, so easy to etch. Miscellaneous PCB and 4-pin Molex 0.1-inch connector assembly. the noise generator components and constructing the circuit shown in Fig.17. The pivot point should be moved to the standard Baxandall value of 1kHz, as shown in Fig.18. This is done by multiplying the 2.7nF frequency-determining capacitors C4 and C7 by 2.5 to give 6.8nF. If you are using the 20kΩ centre-click pot, use 15nF and change resistors R8, R9, R10 and R13 as previously mentioned. Note the noise generator part of the circuit has to be rejigged to become a bias generator. Also, the first op amp stage is reconfigured to be inverting to ensure there is no overall phase inversion. (This is because the tilt circuit is inverting). The op amp used should be changed to an audio-quality device, such as a TL072 and the resistors to metal-film types. The resistors, pot and capacitors could all be scaled to a lower impedance (capacitors multiplied by 10 and resistors divided by 10) and a PCB The PCB overlay is shown in Fig.14 and the track layout in Fig.15. Since the design is single-sided it is suitable for home etching. Eagle files and PCBway ready-made PCBs will be available from the PE site and shop as usual. I still get my single-sided boards made at PCBway because of the greater joint reliability afforded by plated-through holes. The finished board is shown in Fig.16. It is small enough to be mounted by means of the pot shaft, but support at the back is needed if the unit is to be moved around. Hi-Fi tilt control Here’s a bonus circuit! This design can be adapted for Hi-Fi use by leaving off V+ 24 V R1 100kΩ R10 . kΩ R8 16kΩ R13 16kΩ The 1980s, the decade of analogue noise-based music synthesis The classic analogue drum sound with noise was popularised by the Simmons SDS-3 syndrum, familiar to many UK readers as the tom-tom beats at the beginning of the old theme tune to the BBC soap East Enders. This sound was generated by adding a short duration Fig.17. Circuit for Hi-Fi version of the tilt control with noise source removed. C7 15nF C8 C1 10µ F C2 R5 22µ F 10kΩ 8 3 + I C1a T L07 2 2 – C3 + 100µ F 22µ F + + CW 1 4 R6 10kΩ C6 4 7 0nF R7 100kΩ C5 4 7 0nF N otes f or P CB – see Fig. 19 1. Link R3 on P CB 2. Mounting of C2: V– lead to p ad nearest R3 on I C2. 3. I np ut p in is p ad f or R2 R11 20kΩ W -law Centre d etent R17 560kΩ 6 – 5 + R14 100Ω 7 I C1b B i-Fet (eg, T L06 2) C9 4 .7 µ F O utp ut p in 4 + I np ut R9 . kΩ NE5532 op amp used to further reduce noise and distortion. The power supply should be upped to say 24V to give reasonable headroom. Finally, Fig.19 shows the PCB constructed as a tilt-control-only circuit. The pot can be replaced with a dual-gang version for stereo use. 1/ 2 V+ bias + R4 100kΩ C4 15nF Fig.16. The finished noise module. Oops I forgot the mounting holes at the back! R15 100kΩ 0V p ins 2, 3 0V Practical Electronics | May | 2020 59 A mp +7.5 Enve lop e 0dB T rigger (p iezo p icku p ) Click leve l Decay –7.5 20 Hz 50 100 200 500 1k 2k 5k 10k 20k P itch bend amount VCO VCA VCA * P itch (f req ) +7.5 O utp ut * Could also be a VCF (f ilter) N oise 0dB N oise leve l –7.5 20 Hz 50 100 200 500 1k 2k 5k 10k 20k Fig.18a. (top) Frequency response of the Hi-Fi tilt control with almost all possible pot positions. Pivot point now the standard 1kHz, using a 20kΩ W-law pot with 15nF frequency-determining capacitors (C4 and 7). Fig.18b shows the response with a 50kΩ lin pot and 6.8nF capacitors, a little higher at 1.2kHz. If 7.5nF caps can be obtained it would be nearer the desired 1kHz. burst of white noise to the start of a filtered decay of a triangle waveform with a bit of downwards pitch bend as the sound decays. Occasionally, the noise had its own envelope and VCA for snare sounds, but it was often sufficient to just mix the noise with the main waveform. The leading edge of the trigger pulse was often also mixed in to give the initial transient hit. Usually, the trigger signal came from a piezo ceramic disc glued to a piece of wood which was struck. Maplin offered some kits called the Syntom and Synwave (published in Electronic and Music Maker in April and July 1981) which used these tricks. Putting the two together made a plausible Simmonds imitator. Building loads of them helped fund my student digs at the time. The basic block diagram is shown below in Fig.21. I suspect it’s only a matter of time before the Syntom is resurrected to replace the Theremin as the new hipster musical toy. Vinyl scratch simulator Fig.21. Basic syndrum block diagram. + 5V V+ 2V 3V k k 2.2 Ω noise J1 7 6 1nF k + T ime T L06 1 T h resh old leve l 0V – 1 Ω + 2. 2V 2.2 1N 4 14 8 2.2 Ω 1 6 Fig.22. ‘Vinyl scratch’ generator. vital part, but there is also anti-phase, low-frequency rumble; wow and flutter; and also distortion effects to add. The JFET circuit shown in Fig.22 produces the short-duration random spikes to produce ‘scratches’ when fed with random noise. It also makes a good Geiger-counter effect – great for dispersing any eco-warriors who wander into the workshop. Cymbals and high-hats These sounds are often generated most simply by putting the white noise though a resonant 10kHz tuned LC circuit filter (Fig.23) often heard in old 1970s electronic organs (Klaus Wunderlich anyone? https://youtu.be/29RU-3q_p9U). A more metallic effect is achieved by ring-modulating white noise with a high-frequency tone, which generates a whole range of dissonant sidebands. The simplest way of doing this is to use exclusive-or (XOR) gates, which provide the square-wave equivalent of ring modulation. Alternatively, one can just use a hex-inverter chip to generate six square waves together and mix them. This process was used in the Roland TR606 drum machine, a staple of bed-room electronic musicians in the 1980s. Robert Penfold’s Cymbal Synthesiser in Electronics Monthly in December 1984 employed XOR gates. I created a ‘turbine noise’ generator, Fig.20. Finished Hi-Fi tone control PCB. shown in Fig.24 using CD4070 XOR Note there are not enough pins on the gates and 40106 inverters. Gated and Molex connector so a spare pad is used filtered it was also good for cymbals. for the input connection. This is the black Varying the supply voltage (3 to 15V) and white striped wire. The input capacitor varies the pitch, a useful side effect of C2 can be seen jumping to a pad on the the wide operating voltage of old-fashvoltage regulator outline. ioned CMOS logic. I think it’s fun to make pristine digital recordings sound like vinyl records. This is necessary for giving a vintage sound effect for films and animations. Of course, scratch noise is a V+ 0V 0V O/P Link Input – + C2 IC2 Fig.19. Note how the components are re-jigged on the PCB to omit the noise generator for the Hi-Fi tilt tone control. 60 Practical Electronics | May | 2020 N oise T win-T section V+ 6 V I np ut 1nF B C54 9 4 7 mH T oko 10RB 4 . 7 nF 1 Ω 50kΩ A nti-log 82kΩ 6 . 8 nF 2. 2nF + 33µ F O utp ut B C54 9 2.2 Ω . kΩ V+ 9 V CW Freq 10kΩ 10kΩ 4 . 7 nF 68kΩ H igh -h at 68kΩ 6 8 nF 1 Ω 18 nF (sets d ecay) 4 .7 µ F 910kΩ 0V + T rigger 4 . 7 nF 910kΩ O utp ut Fig.23. Simple high-hat voicing circuit using a tuned inductor. B C54 9 + 9 V 68kΩ S low 10kΩ Lin Fast S p eed CW + 10µ F CW 1kΩ A nti-log Volume 6.8kΩ + 100µ F CW 1kΩ 100nF 2. 4 nF Resonance 100Ω Lin N oise inp ut 0V 0V 3.3kΩ 150kΩ 14 1 6 . 8 nF 2 I C1a 4 0106 100kΩ 6 . 8 nF 3 2 1 I C2a 4 07 0 11 T R1* B C18 2 0V * T h is stage need ed to clip signal since lev el v aries as p ower sup p ly v oltage to I C1 is v aried . 10 Full-p ower current d emand = 200mA I C1c 4 0106 B eat 6 I C1d 4 0106 120kΩ 13 which was so overused in 1980 records, such as the Kim Carnes song, Bette Davis Eyes – see: https:// youtu.be/wyRosnwO_mg A reasonable clap simulation can be made from a string of typically four white-noise bursts triggered from a pulse-train generator. These can be produced digitally by a 4017 decade-counter IC, which does a quick count and then resets. An analogue method is to use a string of comparators fed by an exponential decay similar to an LED bargraph. This trick was used in Harvey Kent’s Hand Clapper in Practical Electronics in August 1989. Surprisingly, the start of the ‘clap sound mania’ was acoustic, engineered by Alan Parsons in the 1975 Pilot song, January – see: https://youtu.be/WdcrTUcdO0Q (0.36). This effect was achieved by recording real claps with Dolby A noise reduction on, then leaving it off on playback. I feel an urge to design a Clap Trap coming on, oh dear! 10kΩ W h ole circuit q uiescent current, I q = 18 mA 100kΩ Lin 6 . 8 nF 10 9 4 5 I C2b 4 07 0 14 3 8 91kΩ 6 . 8 nF Fig.25. Twin-T band-pass filter: adds a whistling effect to noise. T R2 B C337 I C1b 4 0106 6 . 8 nF 35Ω + 9 V 3.3kΩ 39kΩ I C2c 4 07 0 6 5 35Ω T R4 B C337 4 12 13 I C2d 4 07 0 7 11 10kΩ T R3 B C18 2 12 Speech synthesis I C1e 4 0106 68kΩ 100nF 9 4 8 I C1f 4 0106 0V Noise is an essential component of speech, being present in the ‘ess’ sound components, sibilance and fricatives. This is a whole field in itself and there is insufficient space to dwell on it here (definitely one for the future though), but the circuits given here will provide hours of fun. Fig.24. Turbine generator for simulating the four turbochargers used in a class 40 diesel engine. Submarine sonar sound This is one of my favourite sound effects, very prominent in Thomas Dolby’s track, One of Our Submarines. It consists of feeding bursts of white noise into a high-Q ringing bandpass filter shown in Fig.25. It can also be used to do breathing noises, such as in the BBC drama series Casualty theme tune. It’s also great for doing steam whistles for model railways. The FET ‘puff’ generator in Fig.26 provides a suitable burst of white noise with a bit of decay. Claptrap The Simmons Clap Trap must be the definitive musical white noise ‘clap’ sound (see/hear at: https://youtu.be/k2NoL_a4Ulg) Practical Electronics | May | 2020 T rigger I np ut 1N 4 14 8 + 5V N oise I np ut + 2V to op en gate and p ass noise signal 1N 4 14 8 10kΩ kΩ 10kΩ Delay 2 Ω Lin 220nF B ias 1 Ω 1N 4 14 8 2 kΩ O utp ut J1 7 6 P -ch annel JF ET (Voltagecontrolled attenuator) 0V Fig.26. Using a FET as a voltage-controlled attenuator to pass a ‘puff’ of white noise. 61