Silicon ChipPractically Speaking - August 2020 SILICON CHIP
  1. Outer Front Cover
  2. Contents
  3. Subscriptions: PE Subscription
  4. Subscriptions: PicoLog Cloud
  5. Back Issues: PICOLOG
  6. Publisher's Letter
  7. Feature: The Fox Report by Barry Fox
  8. Feature: Techno Talk by Mark Nelson
  9. Feature: Net Work by Alan Winstanley
  10. Project: Micromite LCD BackPack V3 by Tim Blythman
  11. Project: Steering Wheel audio BUTTON TO INFRARED Adaptor by John Clarke
  12. Project: JUNK MAIL REPELLER! by Allan Linton-Smith
  13. Back Issues by Jim Rowe
  14. Project: Bargain Modules Class-D Stereo Plus Subwoofer Amplifier by Allan Linton-Smith
  15. Feature: Circuit Surgery by Ian Bell
  16. Feature: AUDIO OUT by Jake Rothman
  17. Feature: Make it with Micromite by Phil Boyce
  18. Feature: Practically Speaking by Mike Hibbett
  19. Feature: Max’s Cool Beans by Max the Magnificent
  20. Feature: Electronic Building Blocks by Julian Edgar
  21. PCB Order Form
  22. Advertising Index

This is only a preview of the August 2020 issue of Practical Electronics.

You can view 0 of the 72 pages in the full issue.

Articles in this series:
  • Techno Talk (August 2020)
  • Techno Talk (August 2020)
  • Techno Talk (September 2020)
  • Techno Talk (September 2020)
  • Techno Talk (October 2020)
  • Techno Talk (October 2020)
  • (November 2020)
  • (November 2020)
  • Techno Talk (December 2020)
  • Techno Talk (December 2020)
  • Techno Talk (January 2021)
  • Techno Talk (January 2021)
  • Techno Talk (February 2021)
  • Techno Talk (February 2021)
  • Techno Talk (March 2021)
  • Techno Talk (March 2021)
  • Techno Talk (April 2021)
  • Techno Talk (April 2021)
  • Techno Talk (May 2021)
  • Techno Talk (May 2021)
  • Techno Talk (June 2021)
  • Techno Talk (June 2021)
  • Techno Talk (July 2021)
  • Techno Talk (July 2021)
  • Techno Talk (August 2021)
  • Techno Talk (August 2021)
  • Techno Talk (September 2021)
  • Techno Talk (September 2021)
  • Techno Talk (October 2021)
  • Techno Talk (October 2021)
  • Techno Talk (November 2021)
  • Techno Talk (November 2021)
  • Techno Talk (December 2021)
  • Techno Talk (December 2021)
  • Communing with nature (January 2022)
  • Communing with nature (January 2022)
  • Should we be worried? (February 2022)
  • Should we be worried? (February 2022)
  • How resilient is your lifeline? (March 2022)
  • How resilient is your lifeline? (March 2022)
  • Go eco, get ethical! (April 2022)
  • Go eco, get ethical! (April 2022)
  • From nano to bio (May 2022)
  • From nano to bio (May 2022)
  • Positivity follows the gloom (June 2022)
  • Positivity follows the gloom (June 2022)
  • Mixed menu (July 2022)
  • Mixed menu (July 2022)
  • Time for a total rethink? (August 2022)
  • Time for a total rethink? (August 2022)
  • What’s in a name? (September 2022)
  • What’s in a name? (September 2022)
  • Forget leaves on the line! (October 2022)
  • Forget leaves on the line! (October 2022)
  • Giant Boost for Batteries (December 2022)
  • Giant Boost for Batteries (December 2022)
  • Raudive Voices Revisited (January 2023)
  • Raudive Voices Revisited (January 2023)
  • A thousand words (February 2023)
  • A thousand words (February 2023)
  • It’s handover time (March 2023)
  • It’s handover time (March 2023)
  • AI, Robots, Horticulture and Agriculture (April 2023)
  • AI, Robots, Horticulture and Agriculture (April 2023)
  • Prophecy can be perplexing (May 2023)
  • Prophecy can be perplexing (May 2023)
  • Technology comes in different shapes and sizes (June 2023)
  • Technology comes in different shapes and sizes (June 2023)
  • AI and robots – what could possibly go wrong? (July 2023)
  • AI and robots – what could possibly go wrong? (July 2023)
  • How long until we’re all out of work? (August 2023)
  • How long until we’re all out of work? (August 2023)
  • We both have truths, are mine the same as yours? (September 2023)
  • We both have truths, are mine the same as yours? (September 2023)
  • Holy Spheres, Batman! (October 2023)
  • Holy Spheres, Batman! (October 2023)
  • Where’s my pneumatic car? (November 2023)
  • Where’s my pneumatic car? (November 2023)
  • Good grief! (December 2023)
  • Good grief! (December 2023)
  • Cheeky chiplets (January 2024)
  • Cheeky chiplets (January 2024)
  • Cheeky chiplets (February 2024)
  • Cheeky chiplets (February 2024)
  • The Wibbly-Wobbly World of Quantum (March 2024)
  • The Wibbly-Wobbly World of Quantum (March 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Wait! What? Really? (April 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Wait! What? Really? (April 2024)
  • Techno Talk - One step closer to a dystopian abyss? (May 2024)
  • Techno Talk - One step closer to a dystopian abyss? (May 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Program that! (June 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Program that! (June 2024)
  • Techno Talk (July 2024)
  • Techno Talk (July 2024)
  • Techno Talk - That makes so much sense! (August 2024)
  • Techno Talk - That makes so much sense! (August 2024)
  • Techno Talk - I don’t want to be a Norbert... (September 2024)
  • Techno Talk - I don’t want to be a Norbert... (September 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Sticking the landing (October 2024)
  • Techno Talk - Sticking the landing (October 2024)
  • Techno Talk (November 2024)
  • Techno Talk (November 2024)
  • Techno Talk (December 2024)
  • Techno Talk (December 2024)
  • Techno Talk (January 2025)
  • Techno Talk (January 2025)
  • Techno Talk (February 2025)
  • Techno Talk (February 2025)
  • Techno Talk (March 2025)
  • Techno Talk (March 2025)
  • Techno Talk (April 2025)
  • Techno Talk (April 2025)
  • Techno Talk (May 2025)
  • Techno Talk (May 2025)
  • Techno Talk (June 2025)
  • Techno Talk (June 2025)
  • Techno Talk (July 2025)
  • Techno Talk (July 2025)
Practically Speaking Hands-on techniques for turning ideas into projects – by Mike Hibbett Introduction to surface-mount technology – Part 3 I n the June issue we looked at how to choose SMD (surface-mount device) components for projects. We started with the simplest devices; passives such as resistors and capacitors. In this concluding article we will move onto the more complex task of IC and transistor selection. First, let us dispel a common myth. SMDs are not ‘different’ to through-hole devices; in most cases the electronics inside the device, the sliver of silicon on which the circuit is built up, is identical. The difference is simply the package they come in, and the wires that connect the sliver of Silicon to the outside world. You might ask, ‘Why have different package sizes?’ There are a number of reasons. Packaging Wire-ended components have been a popular choice for engineers for decades because they are a logical improvement from earlier manufacturing technologies based around point-to-point wiring solutions from the valve era (see Part 1). As the working voltages of circuits lowered from hundreds of volts (using valves) to the 12V or lower of modern transistor circuits, the size of the circuits inside components could be reduced; one reason being that the circuits did not require large track widths and spacings to avoid voltage breakdown. Just as improvements in semiconductor technology brought lower operating voltages, they also reduced current consumption, at least for digital devices. A few exotic semiconductor devices still switch high voltages and high currents, but they are rare, and it would be unwise to work with them unless you really know what you are doing! The lowering of device voltage and current consumption also lowered the diameter of the wires connecting the surface of the silicon to the pins on the device package. Since the circuits to which these devices are connected to have thin tracks, then so too can the packages in which the components are placed. Fig.1 shows some examples – a BC547 in the familiar TO92 package and 56 also in the SMD SOT23 package. Same device, different wires attached to it in the packaging. As you can see in Fig.2, the two package images in Fig.1 are not shown to the same scale! Both of these transistors are still in high-volume production, and both are in high demand. So why has the much smaller and cheaper SMD variant not rendered the older through-hole part obsolete, like valves? Through-hole components still have value in the global electronics industry. Old product designs that use through-hole components are still working, still valuable, so why change? Examples include railway station ticketing machines, electronic access gates and fire alarm systems, to name a few. As the saying goes, ‘if it ain’t broke, don’t fit it!’ and there are many electronic systems in use globally that were designed 30 years ago, and which are still commercially valuable. There are some specific cases where through-hole components still dominate in modern designs. The main example is in high-energy systems, where transistors switching very large currents, such as heating controllers, require thick wires to pass the large currents. For the majority of hobbyist projects, however, very large current handling is rarely a design requirement. The demand for SMD The move to SMD components was driven by the consumer electronics market, specifically audio, computing and communication devices, where very large currents are not a factor (excluding power amplifier circuits, of course) and the sheer quantity of potential sales drove research, both academically and within industry, to improve the efficiency of electronics manufacturing, where efficiency measures not only cost, but also reliability, size, weight, and the ease and speed of manufacture. That research and innovation drove the need to be able to place components onto PCBs quickly. Machines already existed that could place wire-ended components onto a PCB, cut the leads back and pass them through a soldering Fig.1. Two variants of the same BC547 transistor, but at very different scales. bath. The technology developed to place wire-ended components into PCBs is incredible. Check out this YouTube video to see it in practice: https://youtu.be/ ZFy0b-Jw4Ec Although clever through-hole systems are relatively slow and error prone, and with demand for the production of electronics devices increasing, the ability to move to component packages which could be machine placed more easily became a world-wide objective. International standards and cooperation brought us quickly to where we are now, with new package types – without wires – and new production machinery to handle them. On a personal level I feel it was the combination of international cooperation coupled with consumer demand that made this move to SMD production possible, in such a short timescale. Just a few decades. The general trend in IC packages can be seen in Fig.3. The devices in the bottom Fig.2. SMD transistor, to scale. Practical Electronics | August | 2020 row are beyond normal hobbyist application because they demand expensive 4-layer or more PCBs, expensive CAD design tools, and a lot of experience. These tend to be highly specialised devices, so we are not missing much by avoiding them. While new through-hole devices have been supplemented by surface-mount devices and continue to be available in both package types, some new devices are only available in SMD. This is because surface mounting does provide some unique benefits. Shorter wire lengths means devices can run at higher frequencies, which can be beneficial for high-frequency radio parts, or fast microcontrollers. Some devices are designed for specific uses – like smart-phones or personal computers – so it makes no sense to offer the parts in older package formats. On the other hand, for a voltage regulator it may make sense to offer the part in both case styles, but for something like a camera chip or a Flash memory device, the target applications do not include old-style manufacturing techniques. So, as interesting ICs come onto the market, our choice as hobbyists is to either learn new soldering techniques or rely on the likes of Adafruit or Sparkfun to produce a small, simple ‘plug-in’ PCB, holding nothing other than the IC and its necessary components. If you are not tight for space in your project design, this plug-in PCB approach is perfectly reasonable – and there are many fareast suppliers making these ‘break-out’ boards available on eBay for this exact purpose. Fig.4 shows a typical board available from Sparkfun. Just the IC and two capacitors, but with a 0.1-inch SIL header strip allowing it to be placed onto a regular breadboard. Two mounting holes enable it to be fixed within a project enclosure. Whatever the package, some things never change. Whether you are buying a chip or a PCB, you will still face the same issue – is this device right for your design, and will it work with your other Fig.3. IC package trends from classic DIP to assorted SMD varieties (image: Microchip). components easily? To understand this, you are going to have to delve into the manufacturer’s datasheet. Datasheets Datasheets follow a fairly standard format, containing similar information even across different types of device technologies. This information can be summarised as:  Functional overview  Device variants listing  Absolute maximum values  Detail of operation  Reference application circuit  AC/DC characteristics  Temperature – always has an impact  Device packaging specifications  Shipping packaging specifications Some of these sections are obvious. Let’s dive into the sections that are less so. Device variants This section details the different manufactured variants of the device that are available. For microcontrollers this can be memory size, I/O pin count, and even the maximum operational frequency. It’s not uncommon for some of the features listed in the datasheet to be missing on smaller pin count package variants, so take care when choosing your package. Each device variant will have a unique order code, which will be listed in the datasheet. Absolute Maximum values Fig.4. SMD breakout boards are the hobbyists new friend!. Practical Electronics | August | 2020 These parameters list the voltages, frequencies and temperature range outside of which the device is almost certain to be destroyed, or not function. A 5V microcontroller may have an absolute maximum working voltage of 6.5V. Never design your device to the values in this section of the datasheet. AC/DC characteristics In this section the manufacturer provides examples of what the operational parameters will be like when the device is in use. This will include current consumption and maximum operating speed, usually given at different voltages and temperatures. This section is critical for understanding, for example, what size of battery or power supply you will need to power your circuit. Functional overview This is the meat of the datasheet; it’s the section you need to be fully familiar with before designing the part into your circuit. How long this section is will depend on the complexity of the part. We’ve listed a cross section of device datasheets at the end of this article, ranging from a seven-page transistor datasheet, through a 40-page LM358 op amp datasheet up to a 600-page (!) microcontroller specification. 20 years ago, you would have needed to be intimately familiar with every page of that 600-page document, but in recent times the industry has moved to making the designer’s job simpler. Datasheets typically provide an example application circuit, which invariably becomes the starting point for designers. For simple circuits this often forms the complete electrical design for your project. It’s also not uncommon for a recommended PCB layout to be provided, especially for power, audio or RF ICs. When a recommended PCB layout is provided always follow it as closely as possible; in our experience the term ‘mandatory’ would have been better than ‘recommended’. More complicated ICs will have separate application notes that provide the design of complete reference products, completely free to copy into professional 57 Fig.5. Manually placed SMD components and manual soldering. Fig.6. Organisation is crucial when assembling PCBs with SMD parts. designs. It is your responsibility to ensure the circuit works in your actual application, but often 90% of the design work is done for you, including source code for the software to make use of the IC’s complex peripherals, again with example product designs, free to use. A final point on datasheets: some components are ‘generic’, meaning they are produced by different manufacturers, so be careful to read the actual manufacturer’s datasheet for the part you are using. Voltage regulators, 555 timers and 358 op amps are just a few examples of devices supplied by different manufactures. Subtle differences in, for example, peak working voltage or quiescent current consumption, are normal and can impact your design, so remember to look at the correct manufacturer’s datasheet. assemble several identical PCBs. Parts are assembled in ‘batches’ of components to minimise the clutter on the workbench; each component placed in a container, clearly marked. Tweezers are used to pick a component from each container, placed onto the PCB and soldered. If a component is dropped, don’t waste time looking for it – pick another! With surface-mount work, where you need a visual aid to do the work we find the best process is to lay the PCB flat under a microscope or magnifying glass, and keep the PCB fixed in place with masking tape or blue-tack. When assembling several boards of the same design we typically resort to building a simple jig out of balsa wood. The jig is stuck in place and the PCB dropped into the recess. This works very well and is cheap and easy to do. The walls of the jig are glued in place with super-glue, so a jig can be manufactured in minutes. PCB assembly with SMDs In general, when creating a PCB with SMD parts you will be using a CAD program. For example, you might use popular (and free) applications such as EagleCAD or KiCAD to design your board. These tools come with standard component footprints, but do be aware that there are a number of different pad sizes available for a given component size, such as 0805 resistors and capacitors. There are ISO standards that define large, medium and small footprints – relative terms, of course! A component supplier will always have their own specific design recommendations within their datasheet. For high-component-density designs, and to minimise the risk of soldering failures, a designer will normally follow the component supplier’s recommendations. They will discuss the proposed design layout with the PCB assembly company they intend to use, to ensure the design makes best use of the machines that will be used to solder the parts. As hobbyists, we are not required to focus on the high-volume manufacturability of our designs; we want to make them as easy to hand solder as possible. With this in mind, look to use a component footprint that leaves exposed copper on the pad for easy access with a soldering iron. Fig.5 shows a board designed by the author that was hand assembled. Notice the large amount of solder on the pads of C5; this part took just a few seconds to hand solder. Fig.5 highlights another important point with board designs using SMD component placement. The capacitors surrounding the IC are close to it, as they are required to be. They could have been a lot closer, but if they were, it would have made soldering to the IC pins difficult without causing shorts. Even with this design the IC had to be hand placed first, so that the capacitors did not restrict access to it with a soldering iron. Organising your components during assembly is critical. Only resistors come with a clear value indicated, capacitors in the main do not. In Fig.6 you can see the author preparing to 58 Advanced selection As you move from hobbyist projects into professional circuit design and product creation, additional requirements come into play. It’s important to understand if the part you are selecting meets the standards of the countries you are going to be selling in – for example, is the device lead free (ROHS compliant), is it available in reels, and if so, will those reels fit on your manufacturer’s machines? All of this information is available in the datasheet or documents the datasheet refers too. Reels of components are always supplied in airtight wrappers. If an SMD component is exposed to air, moisture can creep into the package and potentially destroy the device when rapidly heated in a production SMD oven. The degree of sensitivity to moisture ingression is related to the device package design and is always stated on the datasheet. As a rule of thumb, we never open sealed component packs destined for our manufacturer! In summary The industry trend is to continue to make small, close-pin pitched ICs that will continue to pose challenges for hobbyists. Thankfully, the global hobbyist market is large enough that it is commercially viable for electronics manufacturers to supply break-out boards for a wide variety of exotic ICs, so we hobbyists will not be excluded from taking advantage of the latest advances in IC technologies. You can expect to see more use of break-out boards in Practical Electronics articles, including the current Pic n’ Mix series. References to datasheets https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/pdf/nRF52833_PS_v1.2.pdf https://www.mouser.com/datasheet/2/149/BC547-190204.pdf http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/devicedoc/22008e.pdf https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lm358-n.pdf Practical Electronics | August | 2020