Silicon ChipSwitch those computers off when not in use - January 2000 SILICON CHIP
  1. Outer Front Cover
  2. Contents
  3. Publisher's Letter: Switch those computers off when not in use
  4. Feature: Protel 99: Much More Than A PCB Design Tool by Peter Smith
  5. Review: B&W Nautilus 801 Monitor Loudspeakers by Louis Challis
  6. Serviceman's Log: They came in two by two by The TV Serviceman
  7. Project: Spring Reverberation Module by John Clarke
  8. Project: An Audio-Video Test Generator by Leon Williams
  9. Product Showcase
  10. Project: PICMAN Programmable Robot by Andersson Nguyen
  11. Order Form
  12. Project: Parallel Port Interface Card by Peter Smith
  13. Vintage Radio: Building a vintage radio replica by Rodney Champness
  14. Project: Off-Hook Indicator For Telephone Lines by John Clarke
  15. Book Store
  16. Back Issues
  17. Market Centre
  18. Advertising Index
  19. Outer Back Cover

This is only a preview of the January 2000 issue of Silicon Chip.

You can view 33 of the 96 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments.

For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues.

Items relevant to "Spring Reverberation Module":
  • Spring Reverb PCB pattern (PDF download) [01101001] (Free)
Items relevant to "An Audio-Video Test Generator":
  • Audio/Video Test Generator PCB pattern (PDF download) [04101001] (Free)
  • Audio/Video Test Generator panel artwork (PDF download) (Free)
Items relevant to "Parallel Port Interface Card":
  • DOS and Windows software for the Parallel Port Interface Card (Free)
  • Parallel Port Interface Card PCB pattern (PDF download) [K2805] (Free)
Items relevant to "Off-Hook Indicator For Telephone Lines":
  • Telephone Off-Hook Indicator PCB pattern (PDF download) [12101001] (Free)
  • Telephone Off-Hook Indicator panel artwork (PDF download) (Free)

Purchase a printed copy of this issue for $10.00.

PUBLISHER’S LETTER www.siliconchip.com.au Publisher & Editor-in-Chief Leo Simpson, B.Bus., FAICD Production Manager Greg Swain, B.Sc.(Hons.) Technical Staff John Clarke, B.E.(Elec.) Peter Smith Ross Tester Rick Walters Reader Services Ann Jenkinson Advertising Enquiries Rick Winkler Phone (02) 9979 5644 Fax (02) 9979 6503 Mobile: 0414 34 6669 Regular Contributors Brendan Akhurst Louis Challis Rodney Champness Garry Cratt, VK2YBX Julian Edgar, Dip.T.(Sec.), B.Ed Mike Sheriff, B.Sc, VK2YFK Philip Watson, MIREE, VK2ZPW Bob Young SILICON CHIP is published 12 times a year by Silicon Chip Publications Pty Ltd. A.C.N. 003 205 490. All material copyright ©. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written consent of the publisher. Printing: Macquarie Print, Dubbo, NSW. Distribution: Network Distribution Company. Subscription rates: $69.50 per year in Australia. For overseas rates, see the subscription page in this issue. Editorial & advertising offices: Unit 8, 101 Darley St, Mona Vale, NSW 2103. Postal address: PO Box 139, Collaroy Beach, NSW 2097. Phone (02) 9979 5644. Fax (02) 9979 6503. E-mail: silchip<at>siliconchip.com.au ISSN 1030-2662 * Recommended and maximum price only. 2  Silicon Chip Switch those computers off when not in use One of the questions that we are commonly asked is whether computers should be switched off when not in use or whether they should be on permanently. It’s a fair question, particularly when you see that so many professional organisations leave their machines running 24 hours a day – they never turn them off. However, just because these large organisations do it does­n’t make it the right thing to do. Unless computers need to be accessed 24 hours a day, they should not be on permanently. Why? First, and this is a topic that we have touched upon in the past, if a fault occurs in a computer or more likely, in the video monitor, and if no-one is present to turn it off, it could cause a fire. It does happen! In fact, this month one of my own TV sets had a component failure which produced a lot of smoke and un­doubtedly it would have caused a fire if my wife had not been in the room to switch it off. I have seen banks of machines left on in rooms where there are sprinkler systems – so if one machine catches fire, a whole lot of them get a bath! Second, if machines are left on after hours and a thunder­storm occurs, they are vulnerable. And you can have all the electrical protec­tion that money can buy and it won’t mean a thing if the electri­cal supply outside the building gets a direct hit. There is only one sure way to protect a computer against lightning strikes and that is to disconnect it from the mains supply. Third, computers use a lot of electricity if they are left on permanently. In our office at SILICON CHIP there are 11 com­puters and they are only switched on during the day. Only the server is left on permanently, to do after-hours backup. And if a thunderstorm is likely to hit overnight, we switch the server off too. Just think about the power consumption of 11 computers left on permanently. A typical computer with its monitor will consume around 200 watts or more. Leaving 11 of them on perma­nently would be equivalent to running a 2.2kW radiator all the time. Now if we left such a radiator on in the office all the year round, you would say we were insane! You’d be right. The cost of running all our computers for 24 hours a day instead of about 10 hours a day, at 10 cents a kilowatt-hour, is over $1100 for one year. That is not allowing for the extra power we would use for air-conditioning and yet some organisations run hundreds of computers all the time. Sure the dollar cost may not be huge relative to their overall expenses but it probably also reflects their generally slack approach to cost control. One of the arguments commonly raised in favour of running computers continuously is that because they run at the same temperature all the time (not being cycled on and off), they are more reliable. Nonsense. A CRT in a video monitor has a typical brightness “half-life” of about 10,000 to 15,000 hours. 10,000 hours is not much more than a year. In effect, leaving a monitor on permanently (with or without screen-saver) reduces its life by a factor of about three. Hard disk drives also have a finite life – why shorten the time to their ultimate failure? Even if the cost of replacing a failed computer is regarded as small, the time and cost of getting a computer back in use with all its software loaded can be very considerable. Most organisations do not take that into account when they take out insurance. No, whether you have one computer or a hundred, it does not make sense to run them all the time unless they are being used all the time. Switch them off and pull the plug out of the wall socket. And if you must run computers all the time, at least switch off the monitors. Leo Simpson