Silicon ChipA Look At Nuclear Submarines - December 2016 SILICON CHIP
  1. Outer Front Cover
  2. Contents
  3. Publisher's Letter: Controversial topics should be able to be discussed
  4. Feature: A Look At Nuclear Submarines by Dr David Maddison
  5. Project: Automotive Sensor Modifier by John Clarke
  6. Feature: Keep Track Of Anything With TrackR by Ross Tester
  7. Feature: Altronics: 40 Years And Going Strong by Leo Simpson
  8. Project: Arduino-Based Digital Theremin by Bao Smith
  9. Product Showcase
  10. Serviceman's Log: Two crook MacBook Pro laptops by Dave Thompson
  11. Project: Voltage/Current Reference With Touchscreen, Pt.2 by Nicholas Vinen
  12. Feature: Micromite Plus Advanced Programming, Pt.2 by Geoff Graham
  13. Project: El Cheapo Modules From Asia - Part 2 by Jim Rowe
  14. Subscriptions
  15. Vintage Radio: Grundig’s 1958 Taschen-Transistor-Boy 58 by Ian Batty
  16. PartShop
  17. Market Centre
  18. Advertising Index
  19. Notes & Errata: 50A Battery Charger Controller, Nov 16; WiFi Switch Using A Raspberry Pi, Nov 16; Precision Voltage & Current Reference With Touchscreen Control, Oct 16
  20. Outer Back Cover

This is only a preview of the December 2016 issue of Silicon Chip.

You can view 45 of the 104 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments.

For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues.

Items relevant to "Automotive Sensor Modifier":
  • Automotive Sensor Modifier PCB [05111161] (AUD $10.00)
  • PIC16F88-E/P programmed for the Automotive Sensor Modifier [0511116A.HEX] (Programmed Microcontroller, AUD $15.00)
  • Firmware (ASM and HEX) files for the Automotive Sensor Modifier [0511116A.HEX] (Software, Free)
  • Automotive Sensor Modifier PCB pattern (PDF download) [05111161] (Free)
Items relevant to "Arduino-Based Digital Theremin":
  • Firmware (.ino and .c) files for Giving the Ultrasonic Theremin a Volume Control (Software, Free)
  • Firmware (INO and C) files for the Arduino Theremin (Software, Free)
Articles in this series:
  • Arduino-Based Digital Theremin (December 2016)
  • Arduino-Based Digital Theremin (December 2016)
  • Giving the Ultrasonic Theremin A Volume Control (January 2017)
  • Giving the Ultrasonic Theremin A Volume Control (January 2017)
Items relevant to "Voltage/Current Reference With Touchscreen, Pt.2":
  • Touchscreen Voltage/Current Reference PCB [04110161] (AUD $12.50)
  • PIC32MX170F256B-50I/SP programmed for the Micromite-based Touchscreen Voltage/Current Reference v1.00 [0411016A.HEX] (Programmed Microcontroller, AUD $15.00)
  • Short Form Kit for the Touchscreen Voltage/Current Reference (Component, AUD $120.00)
  • Translucent Blue UB1 Lid for the Precision Voltage & Current Reference with Touchscreen Control (PCB, AUD $10.00)
  • Firmware (HEX) file and BASIC source code for the Micromite-based Touchscreen Voltage/Current Reference v1.00 [0411016A.HEX] (Software, Free)
  • Touchscreen Voltage/Current Reference PCB pattern (PDF download) [04110161] (Free)
Articles in this series:
  • Voltage/Current Reference With Touchscreen, Pt.1 (October 2016)
  • Voltage/Current Reference With Touchscreen, Pt.1 (October 2016)
  • Voltage/Current Reference With Touchscreen, Pt.2 (December 2016)
  • Voltage/Current Reference With Touchscreen, Pt.2 (December 2016)
Articles in this series:
  • Micromite Plus Advanced Programming (November 2016)
  • Micromite Plus Advanced Programming (November 2016)
  • Micromite Plus Advanced Programming, Pt.2 (December 2016)
  • Micromite Plus Advanced Programming, Pt.2 (December 2016)
Articles in this series:
  • El Cheapo Modules From Asia - Part 1 (October 2016)
  • El Cheapo Modules From Asia - Part 1 (October 2016)
  • El Cheapo Modules From Asia - Part 2 (December 2016)
  • El Cheapo Modules From Asia - Part 2 (December 2016)
  • El Cheapo Modules From Asia - Part 3 (January 2017)
  • El Cheapo Modules From Asia - Part 3 (January 2017)
  • El Cheapo Modules from Asia - Part 4 (February 2017)
  • El Cheapo Modules from Asia - Part 4 (February 2017)
  • El Cheapo Modules, Part 5: LCD module with I²C (March 2017)
  • El Cheapo Modules, Part 5: LCD module with I²C (March 2017)
  • El Cheapo Modules, Part 6: Direct Digital Synthesiser (April 2017)
  • El Cheapo Modules, Part 6: Direct Digital Synthesiser (April 2017)
  • El Cheapo Modules, Part 7: LED Matrix displays (June 2017)
  • El Cheapo Modules, Part 7: LED Matrix displays (June 2017)
  • El Cheapo Modules: Li-ion & LiPo Chargers (August 2017)
  • El Cheapo Modules: Li-ion & LiPo Chargers (August 2017)
  • El Cheapo modules Part 9: AD9850 DDS module (September 2017)
  • El Cheapo modules Part 9: AD9850 DDS module (September 2017)
  • El Cheapo Modules Part 10: GPS receivers (October 2017)
  • El Cheapo Modules Part 10: GPS receivers (October 2017)
  • El Cheapo Modules 11: Pressure/Temperature Sensors (December 2017)
  • El Cheapo Modules 11: Pressure/Temperature Sensors (December 2017)
  • El Cheapo Modules 12: 2.4GHz Wireless Data Modules (January 2018)
  • El Cheapo Modules 12: 2.4GHz Wireless Data Modules (January 2018)
  • El Cheapo Modules 13: sensing motion and moisture (February 2018)
  • El Cheapo Modules 13: sensing motion and moisture (February 2018)
  • El Cheapo Modules 14: Logarithmic RF Detector (March 2018)
  • El Cheapo Modules 14: Logarithmic RF Detector (March 2018)
  • El Cheapo Modules 16: 35-4400MHz frequency generator (May 2018)
  • El Cheapo Modules 16: 35-4400MHz frequency generator (May 2018)
  • El Cheapo Modules 17: 4GHz digital attenuator (June 2018)
  • El Cheapo Modules 17: 4GHz digital attenuator (June 2018)
  • El Cheapo: 500MHz frequency counter and preamp (July 2018)
  • El Cheapo: 500MHz frequency counter and preamp (July 2018)
  • El Cheapo modules Part 19 – Arduino NFC Shield (September 2018)
  • El Cheapo modules Part 19 – Arduino NFC Shield (September 2018)
  • El cheapo modules, part 20: two tiny compass modules (November 2018)
  • El cheapo modules, part 20: two tiny compass modules (November 2018)
  • El cheapo modules, part 21: stamp-sized audio player (December 2018)
  • El cheapo modules, part 21: stamp-sized audio player (December 2018)
  • El Cheapo Modules 22: Stepper Motor Drivers (February 2019)
  • El Cheapo Modules 22: Stepper Motor Drivers (February 2019)
  • El Cheapo Modules 23: Galvanic Skin Response (March 2019)
  • El Cheapo Modules 23: Galvanic Skin Response (March 2019)
  • El Cheapo Modules: Class D amplifier modules (May 2019)
  • El Cheapo Modules: Class D amplifier modules (May 2019)
  • El Cheapo Modules: Long Range (LoRa) Transceivers (June 2019)
  • El Cheapo Modules: Long Range (LoRa) Transceivers (June 2019)
  • El Cheapo Modules: AD584 Precision Voltage References (July 2019)
  • El Cheapo Modules: AD584 Precision Voltage References (July 2019)
  • Three I-O Expanders to give you more control! (November 2019)
  • Three I-O Expanders to give you more control! (November 2019)
  • El Cheapo modules: “Intelligent” 8x8 RGB LED Matrix (January 2020)
  • El Cheapo modules: “Intelligent” 8x8 RGB LED Matrix (January 2020)
  • El Cheapo modules: 8-channel USB Logic Analyser (February 2020)
  • El Cheapo modules: 8-channel USB Logic Analyser (February 2020)
  • New w-i-d-e-b-a-n-d RTL-SDR modules (May 2020)
  • New w-i-d-e-b-a-n-d RTL-SDR modules (May 2020)
  • New w-i-d-e-b-a-n-d RTL-SDR modules, Part 2 (June 2020)
  • New w-i-d-e-b-a-n-d RTL-SDR modules, Part 2 (June 2020)
  • El Cheapo Modules: Mini Digital Volt/Amp Panel Meters (December 2020)
  • El Cheapo Modules: Mini Digital Volt/Amp Panel Meters (December 2020)
  • El Cheapo Modules: Mini Digital AC Panel Meters (January 2021)
  • El Cheapo Modules: Mini Digital AC Panel Meters (January 2021)
  • El Cheapo Modules: LCR-T4 Digital Multi-Tester (February 2021)
  • El Cheapo Modules: LCR-T4 Digital Multi-Tester (February 2021)
  • El Cheapo Modules: USB-PD chargers (July 2021)
  • El Cheapo Modules: USB-PD chargers (July 2021)
  • El Cheapo Modules: USB-PD Triggers (August 2021)
  • El Cheapo Modules: USB-PD Triggers (August 2021)
  • El Cheapo Modules: 3.8GHz Digital Attenuator (October 2021)
  • El Cheapo Modules: 3.8GHz Digital Attenuator (October 2021)
  • El Cheapo Modules: 6GHz Digital Attenuator (November 2021)
  • El Cheapo Modules: 6GHz Digital Attenuator (November 2021)
  • El Cheapo Modules: 35MHz-4.4GHz Signal Generator (December 2021)
  • El Cheapo Modules: 35MHz-4.4GHz Signal Generator (December 2021)
  • El Cheapo Modules: LTDZ Spectrum Analyser (January 2022)
  • El Cheapo Modules: LTDZ Spectrum Analyser (January 2022)
  • Low-noise HF-UHF Amplifiers (February 2022)
  • Low-noise HF-UHF Amplifiers (February 2022)
  • A Gesture Recognition Module (March 2022)
  • A Gesture Recognition Module (March 2022)
  • Air Quality Sensors (May 2022)
  • Air Quality Sensors (May 2022)
  • MOS Air Quality Sensors (June 2022)
  • MOS Air Quality Sensors (June 2022)
  • PAS CO2 Air Quality Sensor (July 2022)
  • PAS CO2 Air Quality Sensor (July 2022)
  • Particulate Matter (PM) Sensors (November 2022)
  • Particulate Matter (PM) Sensors (November 2022)
  • Heart Rate Sensor Module (February 2023)
  • Heart Rate Sensor Module (February 2023)
  • UVM-30A UV Light Sensor (May 2023)
  • UVM-30A UV Light Sensor (May 2023)
  • VL6180X Rangefinding Module (July 2023)
  • VL6180X Rangefinding Module (July 2023)
  • pH Meter Module (September 2023)
  • pH Meter Module (September 2023)
  • 1.3in Monochrome OLED Display (October 2023)
  • 1.3in Monochrome OLED Display (October 2023)
  • 16-bit precision 4-input ADC (November 2023)
  • 16-bit precision 4-input ADC (November 2023)
  • 1-24V USB Power Supply (October 2024)
  • 1-24V USB Power Supply (October 2024)
  • 14-segment, 4-digit LED Display Modules (November 2024)
  • 0.91-inch OLED Screen (November 2024)
  • 0.91-inch OLED Screen (November 2024)
  • 14-segment, 4-digit LED Display Modules (November 2024)
  • The Quason VL6180X laser rangefinder module (January 2025)
  • TCS230 Colour Sensor (January 2025)
  • The Quason VL6180X laser rangefinder module (January 2025)
  • TCS230 Colour Sensor (January 2025)
  • Using Electronic Modules: 1-24V Adjustable USB Power Supply (February 2025)
  • Using Electronic Modules: 1-24V Adjustable USB Power Supply (February 2025)

Purchase a printed copy of this issue for $10.00.

NUCLEAR SUBMARINES by Dr David Maddison On April 26th this year, the Australian Government announced the $50 billion purchase of the next generation of 12 submarines, with the firm decision being made against the use of nuclear propulsion. Despite this decision, we now take a detailed look at nuclear submarines and their significant advantages compared to diesel-electric counterparts. B efore discussing nuclear submarines, we will briefly look at the history of submarines and the different methods of propulsion which have been used. The idea of a submersible vessel such as a diving bell has been around for a very long time but the first vessels considered to be submarines were powered by hand-operated cranks driving propellers. A famous example was the Turtle, which was said to be used in 1776 in the US War of Independence to attempt to destroy an enemy ship, the HMS Eagle. Arguably, there may have been no such attempt as there is no British record of the incident. However, it was the first submarine to be associated with a military use. The Turtle was not viable, though, as the operator quickly ran out of breathable air. Then in 1863, the French Navy built the 14  Silicon Chip A replica of the Turtle at the Submarine Force Library and Museum in Connecticut, USA, the first submarine associated with military use. Plongeur which was powered by compressed air but this submarine was highly impractical and unmanageable. The next type of propulsion system was developed for the Spanish Navy by Narcis Monturiol in 1867. His “Ictineo II” used steam power on the surface and “air-independent” propulsion under water. The latter propulsion system used hydrogen peroxide which was decomposed, in contact with a catalyst, to generate oxygen and steam. This steam powered the propeller and the oxygen was breathed by the crew – a practical and ingenious approach. With the development of the Whitehead torpedo in 1866 (mentioned in the September 2015 SILICON CHIP article on “Autonomous Underwater Vehicles”), the submarine also became a useful weapon. (For more information on hydrogen persiliconchip.com.au oxide as a fuel, see “Personal Flight Vehicles” in SILICON CHIP, August 2016.) Next came the development of the British Resurgam in 1879. This was powered by a closed-cycle steam engine while on the surface. This engine could generate sufficient superheated steam while the vessel was on the surface to allow it to remain submerged and manoeuvre for up to four hours. Before diving, the furnace was extinguished to avoid using the oxygen inside the submarine. But this submarine was not practical nor useful as the steam engine produced intense heat inside the vessel, as well as leaking fumes. While the Resurgam was not a success, it did lead to the development of the series of Nordenfelt submarines, named after the Swedish industrialist who supported their development. Like the Resurgam, they produced a reserve of pressurised steam on the surface which was later used for underwater propulsion. The Nordenfelt II (1886), III (1886) and IV (1887) each carried torpedoes. The next major development was electric propulsion which required the development of suitable batteries. The first electric submarine was the Nautilus, built in 1886. Designed by Polish-Russian engineer Stefan Drzewiecki, it was 18m long, had a 9.7kW engine and 52 batteries but its development was discontinued after it became stuck in mud; a somewhat ignominious end. This was followed by the Porpoise, designed in 1886 or 1887 by James Franklin Waddington in the UK. It had a battery of 45 2V 660Ah cells. This could power the vessel underwater for eight hours at seven knots (13km/h). The Porpoise was equipped with two externally-mounted torpedoes and even though it performed well, Waddington was unable to get the Royal Navy interested in his futuristic craft and it sat anchored for two years. It was eventually broken up and Waddington went bankrupt. Battery charging A problem with purely electric submarines was that they needed to recharge the batteries without having to return to home port. The idea of recharging the battery on the surface via a petrol, kerosene or diesel powered engine came about around the beginning of the 20th century. This became the dominant form of submarine propulsion and this has been continuously developed ever since. Initially, these submarines had to regularly resurface to charge their batteries and that made them vulnerable. The Dutch are credited with the invention of the snorkel between the two world wars to enable submarines to ingest air for their motor(s) to recharge their batteries while the bulk of the submarine remains submerged. With the use of radar for the detection of German U-boats at sea, the German navy retro-fitted snorkels to their submarines in order to avoid detection. The Royal Navy tested snorkels but did not adopt the idea until after WWII. Nuclear submarines The next great development was nuclear propulsion, with the launching of the USS Nautilus in 1955. Nuclear propulsion offered the possibility of unlimited range, restricted only by the on-board food supply, maintenance requirements, atmosphere control and the mental ability of the crew to remain isolated, with no contact with the outside world. Reactors on nuclear submarines generally do not need refuelling throughout their expected service life of 25 years or more. As an example, the US Virginia-class nuclear attack submarine does not need refuelling for 33 years. Because of the high levels of power available on a nuclear submarine, they have very high top speeds and no restrictions on the “hotel” power loads which provide crew comfort such as unlimited hot showers, very clean air and so on. The high speed and great range of nuclear submarines also mean they can escort naval convoys; conventional submarines are not fast enough to do this (at least, not when submerged). In contrast to the almost unlimited endurance of nuclear submarines, typical diesel-electric submarines might have submerged endurances of a few hours at top speed or a few days at slow speed. With air-independent propulsion or AIP (see panel), the submerged endurance of a non-nuclear submarine might extend, at slow speed, to as much as two weeks or a little more. Nuclear submarine development The idea of a nuclear submarine was proposed by the US Naval Research Laboratory and championed by Admiral Hyman Rickover. The US Government gave approval in 1951 and the first submarine was named USS Nautilus (SSN-571), after the submarine of the same name in the Jules Verne novel, “Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea”, written in 1870. Nautilus took only 19 months to build from the time its keel was laid. It was powered by a purpose-built Westinghouse S2W pressurised water reactor which produced 10MW of power to propel the vessel. On its maiden voyage, the Nautilus travelled 2,200km in less than 90 hours (faster than 13 knots or 24km/h), breaking the record of that time for the greatest distance trav- Internal view of USS Nautilus (SSN-571), the first nuclear-powered submarine, commissioned in 1954. siliconchip.com.au December 2016  15 Typical reactor layout for nuclear submarine. This particular layout is based on UK designs. Note the direct drive from the main turbine via gearing. There is also an electric drive motor which is used in emergency situations which can use power from a battery if needed. elled underwater and the highest sustained speed of a submerged submarine. Nautilus had a displacement of 3533 tonnes surfaced and 4092 tonnes submerged. It had a top speed of 23 knots (43km/h), was 98m long, had six torpedo tubes and a crew complement of 105. By comparison, Australia’s current Collins-class submarines have a displacement of 3100 tonnes surfaced and 3407 tonnes submerged, a maximum speed of 20 knots (37km/h) submerged, a length of 77m, six torpedo tubes and a crew complement of 58. Because of the great sustained speed and endurance of the Nautilus, all existing techniques of anti-submarine warfare at the time were rendered obsolete. Nautilus was also the first vessel to travel to the geographic North Pole under the polar ice cap in 1958. This involved a difficult navigational problem because compasses don’t work at those latitudes and the boat could not surface to take nav- igational measurements from the sun and stars. The navigational problem was solved with the use of a modified inertial guidance system from a cruise missile. The main purpose of the mission to the Pole, apart from setting the record, was President Eisenhower’s desire to demonstrate to the Soviets the capability to launch ballistic missiles from close to their territory. The fascinating details of this journey and other material can be seen in the video link on the Nautilus. Nuclear reactors in submarines Submarine nuclear reactors fall into the category of small nuclear reactors, which by definition have a power output of less than about 300MW. The topic of small nuclear reactors was discussed in the June 2016 issue of SILICON CHIP. The US Virginia-class nuclear attack submarine (displacement 7800 tonnes, 115m long) has a reactor that can deliver 30MW of power to the main propulsor (which is ef- Operation Ivy Bells Operation Ivy Bells involved the use of a nuclear-powered submarine and a nuclearpowered eavesdropping device to tap into Soviet Navy communications that were carried on an undersea cable. In the 1970s, the USA became aware of a submarine cable connecting a Soviet Navy base to the Soviet Pacific Fleet headquarters in Vladivostok. This cable ran through what the Soviets claimed as their territorial waters. The US desired information running through this cable and so deployed the USS Halibut and deep sea divers working from the submarine in 120m of water to attach a recording device to the cable. The device had no galvanic connection 16  Silicon Chip to the cable but could detect information running on the cable via inductive coupling. The listening device itself was nuclear-powered and was 7m long and weighed six tonnes. In the event that the Soviets ever pulled the cable up for repair, the device was designed to fall off so the Soviets would not find it. The device recorded data on tape and every month, divers would return to change the tape. The Soviets did not suspect anything and had perfect confidence in the security of the cable as evidenced by the fact that communications were not encrypted. This listening technique was so successful that many other such taps were installed at different Soviet cable locations and more advanced devices were developed that could store one year’s worth of communications. Eventually, the operation was compromised by an American agent with financial problems who sold the secret to the Soviets in 1980. Some time after that, US Navy divers returned to the site and discovered that the listening device had been removed. siliconchip.com.au (Above): basic “electrolysis” scheme by which electricity is used to separate and collect oxygen and hydrogen from water. (Right): the Treadwell Corporation Low Pressure Electrolyser as used on some US Navy submarines to generate oxygen by the electrolysis of fresh water. Hydrogen that is also produced by the unit is discarded overboard or reacted in another process. fectively a ducted propeller). The largest nuclear submarine class ever built, the Soviet Typhoon class, had two 37MW steam turbines driving its propulsors, delivered from two 190MW (thermal) output reactors. In contrast, the highly advanced air-independent propulsion system on non-nuclear submarines such as the German 212-class (displacement 1830 tonnes submerged, length 57m) has a main motor of 1700kW (ie, 1.7MW), a marine diesel engine with a power rating of 2150kW (2.15MW) and a type U32 fuel cell bank which can provide 240kW (0.24MW). While the two types of submarine are not comparable in size or function, these figures show the huge difference in power. For example, when operating in AIP mode, the 212-class submarine uses the 240kW output of its fuel cells while the US Virginia class has up to 30,000kW available; 125 times more power for just over four times the displacement. Reactors used in submarines have special requirements compared with land-based reactors. They must be corrosion-resistant against sea water, must have minimal vibration when operating, must be resistant to shock waves from explosions and they must not rely on gravity to drop control rods as the submarine may not be in an exactly vertical position. Air Independent Propulsion The possibility of air-independent propulsion (AIP) is often used to argue against the necessity for nuclear submarines, even though the range is still limited. A conventional submarine has to surface regularly to run its (typically) diesel engine to recharge its batteries. Air-independent propulsion has been used as a method to get around this problem and enable a submarine to remain submerged for extended periods of time, giving it the advantage of some extra range, although nothing like that of a nuclear submarine. AIP has the possibility of being retrofitted into existing hulls. AIP can be achieved by using liquid oxygen to provide oxygen to a closed-cysiliconchip.com.au cle diesel engine or alternatively, hydrogen peroxide which decomposes to yield oxygen and water. Both of these approaches have significant safety concerns. Another type of AIP involves a closedcycle steam turbine that burns ethanol and pressurised oxygen (at 60 atmospheres). This particular system is offered by a French company and can be retrofitted into some models of existing French submarines by, in one case, inserting an 8m long, 305-tonne “plug” or section to the hull of a submarine. This system gives an endurance of 21 days underwater. AIP is also available by the use of a Stirling cycle engine using diesel and liquid oxygen, as fuel and oxidiser. In the Swedish Gotland- class submarines, a 75kW engine is used to run a generator to recharge batteries, giving a 14-day endurance at 9.3kph submerged. Fuel cells have also been used for AIP with the use of ethanol and liquid oxygen. Siemens have a range of fuel cells from 30 to 120kW that have been used in some German submarines. The Japanese Soryu-class submarine uses AIP with a Stirling engine and liquid oxygen but it has been suggested that later models may use lithium batteries instead, giving about the same range and much quieter operation. The ultimate form of AIP is, of course, nuclear power. December 2016  17 Furthermore, as well as being compact and needing easy access to maintainable parts, due to limited space they must have a high power output per unit of volume and weight, and must be able to work when the submarine is accelerating, decelerating or turning. Also, they must be able to vary their output power rapidly or shut down altogether. Finally, of course, they must be ultra-safe. Due to the high level of power and required long fuel life, submarine reactors use uranium with a much higher enrichment level than used in civilian power reactors. So while a civilian power reactor typically has fuel with U235 content of around 3 to 5%, a typical military nuclear reactor’s fuel has an enrichment level of 50 to 90%; the US Navy goes higher still and uses 96% U235 in its submarines. The reactor is used to heat a fluid in its primary circuit, typically water under pressure, to a temperature of 250300°C and this is used to heat water in another circuit, the secondary, via a heat exchanger. Two circuits are used so that radioactive byproducts which may leak from the fuel do not leave the reactor compartment. American nuclear submarines use the secondary steam to drive a turbine which drives the propulsion system plus secondary equipment such as electrical generators. By contrast, in French and Chinese nuclear submarines, the steam turbine drives an alternator to produce power for the main electric drive motor. Nuclear submarines usually have a battery bank for emergency use, a diesel engine to recharge it and an electric motor in the drive train so that the submarine can still move in the unlikely event of a reactor shut down. Because the battery bank is only for emergency use, it can be much smaller and lighter than in a conventional submarine. TP Group Carbon Monoxide and Hydrogen Eliminator. 18  Silicon Chip Desalination on a nuclear submarine Sea water is desalinated on a nuclear submarine and the fresh water produced is used for feed water for the steam generators, water for cooling equipment, drinking, cooking and personal hygiene and for electrolysis to generate oxygen for breathing. Two processes can be used for desalination, reverse osmosis or vacuum evaporation/distillation. The latter is commonly used on nuclear submarines and the partial vacuum enables water to boil at a much lower temperature than is normal. The vacuum is produced by the main steam turbine’s condenser and waste steam from the turbine is used as the heat source. Atmospheric control The main requirements for controlling the atmosphere in a nuclear submarine are oxygen generation, CO2 removal (along with other contaminants) and maintenance of the correct humidity level to prevent condensation and for crew comfort. We have touched on oxygen production and there are several electrolysis methods, all of which produce oxygen and hydrogen. In most cases, the hydrogen is pumped outside the hull but it can also be reacted with CO2 from the scrubber to produce a liquid. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is removed from the submarine atmosphere by a process called scrubbing. The most common process involves passing the CO2 through an aqueous solution of a strong organic base, known as MEA (monoethanol amine, NH2C2H4OH). The MEA is then heated to drive off the solution which is compressed and pumped outside the hull. Other gases that need to be controlled are carbon monoxide, which might originate from an accidental fire, frying Oxygen generators – a sealed can containing sodium chlorate to produce oxygen by chemical decomposition. siliconchip.com.au An example of tiles that have become detached from a nuclear submarine due to improper attachment. When attached correctly they are extremely difficult to remove. A wire rope vibration isolator of the type used on a submarine. One side is bolted to the submarine hull and the other to equipment. This model is a GGG Series of anti-vibration mount by Wuxi Hongyuan Devflex Co., Ltd. or combustion of engine emissions; and hydrogen, which may come from the emergency battery bank. These gases can be passed over a special catalyst to oxidise them to CO2 and water, respectively. Other undesirable gases can be eliminated with other types of catalytic reactor than that discussed above and also filtration through activated charcoal. led by Valentin Leroy at the Université Paris Diderot in France. They have produced a silicone tile just 0.23mm thick with internal cylinder-shaped cavities which are 0.013mm high and 0.024mm wide, separated by 0.050mm. Experiments in water showed that this material absorbed 97% of incident sound. For this material to be useful for the sonar frequencies used to detect submarines, the material would need 2mm bubbles in a 4mm thick tile which in theory would attenuate incident sound waves by 10,000 times, 100 times better than previously thought possible. Another proposed (or possibly used) method to reduce the acoustic signatures of submarines involves the use of sound cancelling technology to transmit a sound wave of opposite phase of the sound to be cancelled – as in noise cancelling earphones. Another proposed process is the use of a “phononic crystal” coating theorised by Baile Zhang Nanyang Technological University in Singapore, in which incoming waves bounce off the coating, are curved around and re-enter the crystal, bouncing over and over until they eventually leave the hull in a direction away from the source. Noise and vibration Modern submarines, no matter what their type, use rubber anechoic tiles on their hulls to reduce their acoustic signature, both reducing noise emanating from inside the submarine and also that reflected from incoming sonar signals. Specific details of the tiles are a closely guarded secret so no pictures showing the construction of current tiles in use are available but there are many photos available which show what German tiles from WWII looked like. The ideal tile would be perfectly lossy, work across all frequencies, work at all power levels and work at all operational depths of the submarine. Tiles are typically made of rubber and are around 25mm thick which makes for a significant extra weight and they typically have a series of holes in them to establish a state of destructive interference to absorb sound waves. New tile technology work has been published by a group Vibration isolation Vibration isolation is even more important on a nuclear submarine since cooling pumps for the reactor normally Exploded view (left) and photo (right) of a mount with piezoelectric active vibration control siliconchip.com.au December 2016  19 run continuously. However all submarines need to run air circulation and equipment cooling fans and anything that rotates or makes a noise needs to be silenced. The specific details of vibration isolation in submarines are not usually published but the general techniques can be classified as either passive or active. In passive systems, vibration is mitigated by either rubber pads or mechanical springs. In active systems, an electronic actuator, vibration sensors and a feedback circuit work together to cancel out vibrations by sending out-of-phase motion to generate destructive interference to cancel the vibrational mode detected, again, similar to the technique used in noise-cancelling headphones. Active vibration control can also be used to reduce noise emanating from both the propeller and hull of either type of submarine. A surprisingly simple but very effective passive vibration isolation system involves two plates connected by lengths of wire rope. This system can be used on the small scale such as with small cameras mounted on drones or on the large scale where it can be seen in videos of nuclear submarines. For a practical demonstration of just how effective the wire rope can be, you can see an amateur application as used in a drone camera in the video: https://youtu.be/cajoxGhFQck Note that while reactor cooling pumps normally run all the time, even when the reactor is idle, at times where maximum stealth is required, some reactors can have their coolant pumps shut down. They then rely on convection to circulate cooling water. However this may only be possible for a limited time and even with the pumps shut down, the reactor may not be totally silent due to gas generation (bubbling) and so on. So any techniques which can prevent sound from the reactor core being heard outside the submarine are worthwhile. Nuclear submarine types Today there are two main types of nuclear submarines, attack and ballistic. Attack submarines have a similar purpose to conventional submarines and their functions include fending off enemy vessels which are trying to attack escorted vessels (aircraft carriers, troop transports, etc), attacking enemy vessels with torpedoes, attacking enemy land targets with cruise missiles, espionage operations including direct observation via periscope, listening into communications or sabotage operations with the insertion of commandos into enemy territory. An example of a nuclear attack submarine is the US Virginia class. By contrast, the ballistic missile submarine is not designed to conduct combat operations but to act as an undetectable platform for the launch of submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), which are typically (but not always) fitted with nuclear warheads. There are also ballistic missile submarines which carry cruise missiles with conventional or nuclear warheads, or possibly a mix of both ballistic and cruise missiles. In the case of US ballistic missile submarines, their location is so secret that not even the US Navy headquarters knows where they are at any given time. An example of a nuclear ballistic missile submarine is the US Ohio class. Submarines that carry SLBMs are used only by the major powers: US, Russia, UK, France and China. Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine Ohio-class submarines are designed to launch SLBMs and remain hidden for the duration of their missions. They displace 16,764 tonnes surfaced, 18,750 tonnes submerged and are 170m long. They are powered by an S8G reactor Nuclear powered submarines versus conventional or AIP submarines There are some fundamental operational differences between nuclear submarines and others with relation to their stealthiness and in particular their thermal and audio signatures. Firstly, it has been said that nuclear submarines leave a thermal wake due to the need to continuously cool the reactor, which can, in theory, be used to detect them. However, in well over half a century of operation, no nuclear submarines are known to have been detected by this method, as at the depth they normally travel, the warm water would be quite dispersed by the time it reaches the surface. Secondly, conventional submarines are reputed to be quieter and therefore harder to detect than nuclear submarines. The reason is that a nuclear submarine normally has cooling pumps running which make noise as well as steam noise when compared to a conventional submarine. Of course, conventional submarines are only quiet when submerged; when they are surfaced or snorkelling they are running their diesel engines to recharge the batter20  Silicon Chip ies. Nuclear submarines are no noisier when surfaced than when submerged. It is known with certainty that diesel submarines can be very quiet when submerged, as Australian submarines have been able to score “kills” on major US ships such as aircraft carriers during war games with the US Navy. What is not publicly known however is the true quietness of nuclear submarines. Given the success of nuclear submarines to date, it seems that the theoretical stealth advantage that conventional submarines might have over nuclear (when submerged) is unimportant in practice and has been dealt with by various noise suppression technologies. In fact, in 2012, a Russian nuclear submarine sailed in international waters in the Gulf of Mexico, close to the USA, where it went undetected for several weeks despite expected US surveillance for submarines in the area so close to its shores. Russia is now building nuclear submarines which are even more silent than those involved in this incident. See: www. siliconchip.com.au/l/aaaa However, American nuclear submarines have been traditionally quieter than Soviet or Russian ones. Also, the stealth advantages of conventional submarines would not apply when certain types of AIP are in use since it requires the running of a Stirling engine while submerged. The real issue seems to be not that nuclear submarines are noisier than regular submarines but that all submarines are hard to find. In the marine environment finding a submarine is extremely difficult because of the huge number of noise sources, both natural and artificial. Finding submarines very much comes down to the skill of sonar operators. It has been said that finding a submarine is like listening for a single car engine in a major city. Also, passive sonar is normally used to search for submarines by other submarines. Active sonar, where “pings” are sent out, might be more effective but is not normally used because it discloses the position of the vessel emitting it. siliconchip.com.au Artist’s concept of Cruise missile-converted Ohio class submarine launching Tomahawk missiles. powering two turbines, each producing 45MW of propulsion power. They are reported to be capable of 25 knots (46km/h) submerged and have an official test depth of 240m. The main armament on the later version of the Ohio class is 24 Trident II D5 missiles, each of which can carry up to eight nuclear warheads with a 300-475 kiloton yield and with a range of 11,300km, along with a number of torpedoes. After the end of the Cold War, four of these submarines were converted to launch a variety of different payloads apart from SLBMs. Examples of possible payloads include 154 Tomahawk cruise missiles, other supersonic or hypersonic cruise missiles, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and various intelligence-gathering sensors. US Virginia-class submarine The Virginia class are among the most advanced nuclear attack submarines in the Western world. They are designed for operation in shallow as well as deep water. They are expected to remain in service until as late as 2070. These subs displace 7900 tonnes, are 115m long, have 30MW of propulsive power and have an official top speed of 25 knots although some sources say they can travel at up to 28 knots (52km/h) when submerged, or possibly higher. They have a test depth of 240m, a crew of 135 and depending on the version, can carry a combined 38 torpedoes and Tomahawk cruise missiles. The Virginia class does not use a traditional periscope but has a number of masts for communications, radar, electronic warfare, snorkelling and photonics (ie, visual observation). Unlike a traditional periscope that penetrates the hull and dictates the interior arrangement of the submarine, the photonics masts contain a variety of optical sensors and are connected with wires and optical fibres to the control room rather than a mechanical tube, enabling great flexibility in design as well as the rapid acquisition of data. Because of the enormous power of a nuclear submarine, very careful attention has to be paid to the design of the propulsion system to avoid cavitation and the noise that it creates. Cavitation occurs when a propeller goes beyond a certain speed and bubbles (water vapour) form and cause noise when they collapse. The Virginia class uses pump jet SENSOR UNIT Antenna Assembly Mission Critical Camera Optical Cameras and Laser Rangefinders IR Camera Mast The photonics mast of a Virginia-class submarine. siliconchip.com.au December 2016  21 PROPELLOR SHAFT HATCH TRIDENT 1 MISSILE, 10.3m LONG AND 1.8m DIAMETER RANGE ~ 6500m AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT SPACE (AIR, FRESH WATER EQUIPMENT HATCH BALLAST TANKS ENGINE COMPARTMENT: GEARING, ENGINE, TURRBINE, GENERATOR MISSILE HATCHES DIESEL EXHAUST STACK, PERISCOPES, ANTENNAS MISSILE TUBES NAVIGATION MISSILE CONTROL CENTRE DIVE PLANES CONTROL ROOM AND ATTACK CENTRE RADIO HATCH ROOM SONAR ROOM MANOEUVERING ROOM NUCLEAR REACTOR COMPARTMENT HOVERING PUMPS MEDICAL ROOM, HEADS (TOILETS), SHOWERS AND LAUNDRY ROOM COMPOSITE NOSE CONE SONAR DOME 75mm THICK STEEL HULL, 28m HULL DIAMETER CREW BUNKS Cutaway diagram of Ohio class ballistic missile nuclear submarine. The USS Pennsylvania, a member of the class, is said to be capable of cruising at 25 knots (46kph) underwater. propulsion which is a type of ducted propeller, to minimise cavitation and other noise. No specific details are published but a picture is available of the pump jet propulsor of a US Seawolf-class submarine, which was cancelled before production due to excessive cost (See www.bluebird-electric. net/submarines/submarine_pictures/USS-SeaWolf_fast_attack_submarine_stern_CAD_drawing.jpg). Later versions of the Virginia class have replaced 12 cruise missile launch tubes with two multi-purpose vertical Virginia Payload Tubes (VPTs) which can carry a variety of items such as Tomahawk cruise missiles, unmanned undersea vehicles (UUVs) or other types of weapons or equipment for specific missions. From 2019, an additional section will be added to submarines under construction, adding a whole new 21m-long section with an additional four VPTs which will be the same diameter but taller than the other two. Conclusion So, as you may gather from the above, both nuclear-powered and conventional-powered submarines have distinct advantages. But it’s the nuclear-powered types which have the distinct advantage on range, submerged speed, carrying capacity, power availability and various other parameters which arguably makes them the ultimate sea-based covert military platform. SC AUXILIARY DIESEL ENGINE CREW’S MESS ROOM, GALLEY, DRY & COLD STORAGE, TRASH DISPOSAL ROOM MK-48 TORPEDOES, 4 TORPEDO TUBES OFFICER’S BERTHING BALLAST TANKS Links, books and videos “Questions asked of Australia’s rejection of nuclear submarines” http://siliconchip.com.au/l/aaab “The First Nuclear Submarine in The World” (About the USS Nautilus.) https://youtu.be/FeVwEtmwOqg “The Untold Story of American Submarine Espionage: A Story of Heroes and Spies (1998)” https://youtu.be/yIG4H3QOvH4 “Blind Man’s Bluff: The Untold Story Of American Submarine Espionage”, Book by Sherry Sontag and Christopher Drew, 1998 “USS Virginia - The Virginia-class fast attack Submarine Fleet answering the Call of Duty to 2060” https:// youtu.be/_4mhcE2vPns “USS Pennsylvania Nuclear Submarine-HD Documentary” (About a ballistic missile submarine.) https:// youtu.be/TQLFMRAbOiU “The Largest Submarine in The U.S. Navy” (About a ballistic missile submarine.) https://youtu.be/UxB11eAl-YE “Nuclear Depth Charge: Operation Wigwam Nuclear Test 1955 DOE, USAF Lookout Mountain” https://youtu. be/7vR5n_arLwo AUTHOR’S NOTE: All information in this article was obtained from freely available public sources. Two views of the Virginia class Ship Control Panel from where the boat is manouevered. The usual four crew positions of helmsman, planesman, chief of the watch and diving officer were combined so that two crew could perform all those roles from two workstations. These crew are called the pilot and co-pilot. 22  Silicon Chip siliconchip.com.au