This is only a preview of the May 2012 issue of Silicon Chip. You can view 27 of the 112 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments. For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues. Items relevant to "PIC/AVR Programming Adaptor Board; Pt.1":
Items relevant to "High-Temperature Thermometer/Thermostat":
Items relevant to "1.5kW Induction Motor Speed Controller, Pt.2":
Items relevant to "SemTest Discrete Semiconductor Test Set; Pt.3":
Items relevant to "Ultra-LD Mk.3 135W/Channel Stereo Amplifier, Pt.3":
Purchase a printed copy of this issue for $10.00. |
Ultra-LD Mk.3 Amplifier
Tweaks & Performance
By NICHOLAS VINEN
Finally, we present the specifications for the new Ultra-LD Mk.3
Amplifier along with a couple of minor tweaks to the design to
maximise its performance.
T
HESE FIGURES and graphs show
the performance of the complete
Ultra-LD Mk.3 amplifier. The test
signal source was set to 2V RMS and
connected via the RCA inputs of channel 1 on the rear panel of the unit.
The performance was measured at the
speaker terminals on the rear of the
unit, with a resistive load connected
via 1m of twin lead. The volume control was set to deliver 100W into 8Ω
and 200W into 4Ω with the 2V RMS
input signal.
The overall performance of this
amplifier is much better than the vast
majority of commercial amplifiers,
even expensive models sold as “high
fidelity”. Distortion figures for commercial units are often quite vague;
those that do provide graphs typically
show quite a dramatic rise in distortion
above 1kHz. As you can see from the
graphs published here, our Ultra-LD
Mk.3 retains the low high-frequency
distortion characteristics of the individual modules featured in the July
2011 issue.. The signal-to-noise ratio
is also very good.
The left/right channel performance
differs, despite the fact that the amplifier modules are identical. This is
because one module is closer to the
power transformer than the other;
we purposefully arranged it this way
because otherwise, the transformer
would be close to the sensitive input
circuitry of the right-hand module and
that would be worse.
Specifications
Continuous power, both channels driven (THD+N < 0.1%): 100W into 8Ω; 135W
into 4Ω
Music power, both channels driven: ~150W into 8Ω; ~200W into 4Ω
Total harmonic distortion plus noise: <0.0025%, 1kHz, 20Hz-22kHz bandwidth,
90W (both channels driven)
Signal-to-noise ratio: -109dB (left channel), -115dB (right channel) with respect to
90W into 8Ω
Frequency response: +0,-0.3dB (8Ω), +0,-1.3dB (4Ω) 20Hz-20kHz
Channel separation: approximately 50dB, 4Ω and 8Ω, both channels
96 Silicon Chip
The performance of the right
channel is almost as good as that of
the module by itself, with very low
distortion up to 20kHz – see the red
and mauve traces in Fig.6. This graph
was produced using a wide analyser
bandwidth of 20Hz-80kHz, so that it
includes the first and second harmonics of the higher frequency test signals.
Despite this, distortion is down around
0.001% at 1kHz and below 0.004%
at 20kHz.
The left channel results are slightly
worse for the reasons explained earlier,
but still very good. The higher distortion for the left channel with both
channels driven is due to the increased
magnetic field around the transformer
as it delivers nearly twice the current.
Channel separation is virtually flat
with frequency and insensitive to load
impedance at -50dB.
Further refinements
We made a couple of additional
refinements to the amplifier design
in order to achieve this level of performance, not described in the previous articles. Both changes reduce the
amount of ripple from the power supply that couples into the signal earth.
First, we changed the 10Ω 0.25W
siliconchip.com.au
0.1
THD+N vs Frequency, 90W, 20Hz-80kHz Bandwidth, 8
04/10/12 14:32:38
+1
04/10/12 14:59:31
0
0.05
Left channel, both driven
Left channel, one driven
Right channel, both driven
Right channel, one driven
0.02
-1
8
4
-2
0.01
Relative Amplitude (dBr)
Total Harmonic Distortion + Noise (%)
Frequency Response, 10W, 4 & 8both channels identical)
0.005
0.002
0.001
-3
-4
-5
-6
-7
0.0005
-8
0.0002
-9
0.0001
20
50
100
200
500
1k
2k
5k
10k
-10
10
20k
20
50
100
200
500
Frequency (Hz)
Fig.6: distortion versus frequency into an 8Ω load at
90W per channel. The right channel has lower distortion
than the left channel due to its proximity to the mains
transformer and the hum/buzz coupling that results.
Measurements with a 400Hz high-pass filter show the
performance of the two channels is virtually identical if
hum is ignored.
0.1
THD+N vs Power, 1kHz, 20Hz-22kHz Bandwidth, 8
04/10/12 14:43:57
0.1
10k
THD+N vs Power, 1kHz, 20Hz-22kHz Bandwidth, 4
0.02
Total Harmonic Distortion + Noise (%)
Total Harmonic Distortion + Noise (%)
5k
20k
50k 100k
04/10/12 14:49:53
0.05
Left channel, both driven
Left channel, one driven
Right channel, both driven
Right channel, one driven
0.01
0.005
0.002
0.001
0.0005
Left channel, both driven
Left channel, one driven
Right channel, both driven
Right channel, one driven
0.01
0.005
0.002
0.001
0.0005
0.0002
0.0002
0.0001
0.5
2k
Fig.7: frequency response of the complete amplifier
which is virtually flat from 20Hz to 20kHz. Very little
bass roll-off is evident. The high-frequency roll-off is due
to the output RLC filter, which is necessary to isolate
the amplifier from the speakers and cabling, ensuring
stability. As a result, the 4Ω high-frequency roll-off is
significantly higher than for 8Ω.
0.05
0.02
1k
Frequency (Hz)
1
2
5
10
20
50
100
200 300
0.0001
0.5
1
Fig.8: distortion versus power for 8Ω loads. Again, the
right channel is noticeably lower in distortion than the left
channel. Note that the power supply limits the available
continuous power when driving both channels to around
100W while around 135W can be delivered if a single
channel is driven. Music power is about 150W even if both
channels are driven.
resistor on each amplifier module to
47Ω. This resistor is located to the right
of the RCA input socket and connects
the signal ground to the power supply
ground. If you have already built the
modules, it’s simply a matter of clipping off these resistors, removing the
lead stubs, clearing the holes with a
solder sucker and soldering the new
resistors in place.
The second change is in the amplifier power supply wiring. While it’s
siliconchip.com.au
2
5
10
20
50
100
200 300
Power (W)
Power (W)
Fig.9: distortion versus power for 4Ω loads. As is typical
for power amplifiers, the distortion is somewhat higher
when driving 4Ω loads than 8Ω loads, partly due to
the increased noise that results from the lower load
impedance. The power delivered is higher than for 8Ω,
with around 135W per channel available when both are
driven and about 200W with a single channel driven.
convenient to wire up each amplifier
module to its own terminal on the
power supply board, this results in a
relatively high ground resistance between the two modules. Performance
is improved if both are wired to the
same supply terminal, with a longer
cable running from the left-hand
module to the supply terminal on the
right side.
This requires one 3-wire supply lead
to be longer than previously speci-
fied, around 150mm. This is then run
around the capacitors at the bottom of
the power supply module to reach the
power connector for the left channel
amplifier.
Keep it as short as possible and use
heavy-duty wire as lower resistance
means lower distortion. Twist the
leads together before plugging it into
the connector on the module.
With these changes, your amplifier
SC
will give the best performance.
May 2012 97
|