Silicon ChipThe Electronic Dentist - March 1992 SILICON CHIP
  1. Outer Front Cover
  2. Contents
  3. Publisher's Letter: The truth about fax machines
  4. Feature: The Electronic Dentist by Siemens Review
  5. Project: TV Transmitter For VHF VCRs by John Clarke
  6. Project: Studio Twin Fifty Amplifier, Pt.1 by Leo Simpson & Bob Flynn
  7. Project: Thermostatic Switch For Car Radiator Fans by John Clarke
  8. Feature: Amateur Radio by Garry Cratt, VK2YBX
  9. Feature: Computer Bits by Jennifer Bonnitcha
  10. Serviceman's Log: VCR tape transport problems by The TV Serviceman
  11. Project: Build A Telephone Call Timer by Darren Yates
  12. Vintage Radio: A look at valve substitutions by John Hill
  13. Feature: Remote Control by Bob Young
  14. Subscriptions
  15. Back Issues
  16. Order Form
  17. Market Centre
  18. Outer Back Cover

This is only a preview of the March 1992 issue of Silicon Chip.

You can view 39 of the 96 pages in the full issue, including the advertisments.

For full access, purchase the issue for $10.00 or subscribe for access to the latest issues.

Articles in this series:
  • Studio Twin Fifty Amplifier, Pt.1 (March 1992)
  • Studio Twin Fifty Amplifier, Pt.1 (March 1992)
  • Studio Twin Fifty Amplifier, Pt.2 (April 1992)
  • Studio Twin Fifty Amplifier, Pt.2 (April 1992)
Articles in this series:
  • Amateur Radio (November 1987)
  • Amateur Radio (November 1987)
  • Amateur Radio (December 1987)
  • Amateur Radio (December 1987)
  • Amateur Radio (February 1988)
  • Amateur Radio (February 1988)
  • Amateur Radio (March 1988)
  • Amateur Radio (March 1988)
  • Amateur Radio (April 1988)
  • Amateur Radio (April 1988)
  • Amateur Radio (May 1988)
  • Amateur Radio (May 1988)
  • Amateur Radio (June 1988)
  • Amateur Radio (June 1988)
  • Amateur Radio (July 1988)
  • Amateur Radio (July 1988)
  • Amateur Radio (August 1988)
  • Amateur Radio (August 1988)
  • Amateur Radio (September 1988)
  • Amateur Radio (September 1988)
  • Amateur Radio (October 1988)
  • Amateur Radio (October 1988)
  • Amateur Radio (November 1988)
  • Amateur Radio (November 1988)
  • Amateur Radio (December 1988)
  • Amateur Radio (December 1988)
  • Amateur Radio (January 1989)
  • Amateur Radio (January 1989)
  • Amateur Radio (April 1989)
  • Amateur Radio (April 1989)
  • Amateur Radio (May 1989)
  • Amateur Radio (May 1989)
  • Amateur Radio (June 1989)
  • Amateur Radio (June 1989)
  • Amateur Radio (July 1989)
  • Amateur Radio (July 1989)
  • Amateur Radio (August 1989)
  • Amateur Radio (August 1989)
  • Amateur Radio (September 1989)
  • Amateur Radio (September 1989)
  • Amateur Radio (October 1989)
  • Amateur Radio (October 1989)
  • Amateur Radio (November 1989)
  • Amateur Radio (November 1989)
  • Amateur Radio (December 1989)
  • Amateur Radio (December 1989)
  • Amateur Radio (February 1990)
  • Amateur Radio (February 1990)
  • Amateur Radio (March 1990)
  • Amateur Radio (March 1990)
  • Amateur Radio (April 1990)
  • Amateur Radio (April 1990)
  • Amateur Radio (May 1990)
  • Amateur Radio (May 1990)
  • Amateur Radio (June 1990)
  • Amateur Radio (June 1990)
  • Amateur Radio (July 1990)
  • Amateur Radio (July 1990)
  • The "Tube" vs. The Microchip (August 1990)
  • The "Tube" vs. The Microchip (August 1990)
  • Amateur Radio (September 1990)
  • Amateur Radio (September 1990)
  • Amateur Radio (October 1990)
  • Amateur Radio (October 1990)
  • Amateur Radio (November 1990)
  • Amateur Radio (November 1990)
  • Amateur Radio (December 1990)
  • Amateur Radio (December 1990)
  • Amateur Radio (January 1991)
  • Amateur Radio (January 1991)
  • Amateur Radio (February 1991)
  • Amateur Radio (February 1991)
  • Amateur Radio (March 1991)
  • Amateur Radio (March 1991)
  • Amateur Radio (April 1991)
  • Amateur Radio (April 1991)
  • Amateur Radio (May 1991)
  • Amateur Radio (May 1991)
  • Amateur Radio (June 1991)
  • Amateur Radio (June 1991)
  • Amateur Radio (July 1991)
  • Amateur Radio (July 1991)
  • Amateur Radio (August 1991)
  • Amateur Radio (August 1991)
  • Amateur Radio (September 1991)
  • Amateur Radio (September 1991)
  • Amateur Radio (October 1991)
  • Amateur Radio (October 1991)
  • Amateur Radio (November 1991)
  • Amateur Radio (November 1991)
  • Amateur Radio (January 1992)
  • Amateur Radio (January 1992)
  • Amateur Radio (February 1992)
  • Amateur Radio (February 1992)
  • Amateur Radio (March 1992)
  • Amateur Radio (March 1992)
  • Amateur Radio (July 1992)
  • Amateur Radio (July 1992)
  • Amateur Radio (August 1992)
  • Amateur Radio (August 1992)
  • Amateur Radio (September 1992)
  • Amateur Radio (September 1992)
  • Amateur Radio (October 1992)
  • Amateur Radio (October 1992)
  • Amateur Radio (November 1992)
  • Amateur Radio (November 1992)
  • Amateur Radio (January 1993)
  • Amateur Radio (January 1993)
  • Amateur Radio (March 1993)
  • Amateur Radio (March 1993)
  • Amateur Radio (May 1993)
  • Amateur Radio (May 1993)
  • Amateur Radio (June 1993)
  • Amateur Radio (June 1993)
  • Amateur Radio (July 1993)
  • Amateur Radio (July 1993)
  • Amateur Radio (August 1993)
  • Amateur Radio (August 1993)
  • Amateur Radio (September 1993)
  • Amateur Radio (September 1993)
  • Amateur Radio (October 1993)
  • Amateur Radio (October 1993)
  • Amateur Radio (December 1993)
  • Amateur Radio (December 1993)
  • Amateur Radio (February 1994)
  • Amateur Radio (February 1994)
  • Amateur Radio (March 1994)
  • Amateur Radio (March 1994)
  • Amateur Radio (May 1994)
  • Amateur Radio (May 1994)
  • Amateur Radio (June 1994)
  • Amateur Radio (June 1994)
  • Amateur Radio (September 1994)
  • Amateur Radio (September 1994)
  • Amateur Radio (December 1994)
  • Amateur Radio (December 1994)
  • Amateur Radio (January 1995)
  • Amateur Radio (January 1995)
  • CB Radio Can Now Transmit Data (March 2001)
  • CB Radio Can Now Transmit Data (March 2001)
  • What's On Offer In "Walkie Talkies" (March 2001)
  • What's On Offer In "Walkie Talkies" (March 2001)
  • Stressless Wireless (October 2004)
  • Stressless Wireless (October 2004)
  • WiNRADiO: Marrying A Radio Receiver To A PC (January 2007)
  • WiNRADiO: Marrying A Radio Receiver To A PC (January 2007)
  • “Degen” Synthesised HF Communications Receiver (January 2007)
  • “Degen” Synthesised HF Communications Receiver (January 2007)
  • PICAXE-08M 433MHz Data Transceiver (October 2008)
  • PICAXE-08M 433MHz Data Transceiver (October 2008)
  • Half-Duplex With HopeRF’s HM-TR UHF Transceivers (April 2009)
  • Half-Duplex With HopeRF’s HM-TR UHF Transceivers (April 2009)
  • Dorji 433MHz Wireless Data Modules (January 2012)
  • Dorji 433MHz Wireless Data Modules (January 2012)
Articles in this series:
  • Computer Bits (July 1989)
  • Computer Bits (July 1989)
  • Computer Bits (August 1989)
  • Computer Bits (August 1989)
  • Computer Bits (September 1989)
  • Computer Bits (September 1989)
  • Computer Bits (October 1989)
  • Computer Bits (October 1989)
  • Computer Bits (November 1989)
  • Computer Bits (November 1989)
  • Computer Bits (January 1990)
  • Computer Bits (January 1990)
  • Computer Bits (April 1990)
  • Computer Bits (April 1990)
  • Computer Bits (October 1990)
  • Computer Bits (October 1990)
  • Computer Bits (November 1990)
  • Computer Bits (November 1990)
  • Computer Bits (December 1990)
  • Computer Bits (December 1990)
  • Computer Bits (January 1991)
  • Computer Bits (January 1991)
  • Computer Bits (February 1991)
  • Computer Bits (February 1991)
  • Computer Bits (March 1991)
  • Computer Bits (March 1991)
  • Computer Bits (April 1991)
  • Computer Bits (April 1991)
  • Computer Bits (May 1991)
  • Computer Bits (May 1991)
  • Computer Bits (June 1991)
  • Computer Bits (June 1991)
  • Computer Bits (July 1991)
  • Computer Bits (July 1991)
  • Computer Bits (August 1991)
  • Computer Bits (August 1991)
  • Computer Bits (September 1991)
  • Computer Bits (September 1991)
  • Computer Bits (October 1991)
  • Computer Bits (October 1991)
  • Computer Bits (November 1991)
  • Computer Bits (November 1991)
  • Computer Bits (December 1991)
  • Computer Bits (December 1991)
  • Computer Bits (January 1992)
  • Computer Bits (January 1992)
  • Computer Bits (February 1992)
  • Computer Bits (February 1992)
  • Computer Bits (March 1992)
  • Computer Bits (March 1992)
  • Computer Bits (May 1992)
  • Computer Bits (May 1992)
  • Computer Bits (June 1992)
  • Computer Bits (June 1992)
  • Computer Bits (July 1992)
  • Computer Bits (July 1992)
  • Computer Bits (September 1992)
  • Computer Bits (September 1992)
  • Computer Bits (October 1992)
  • Computer Bits (October 1992)
  • Computer Bits (November 1992)
  • Computer Bits (November 1992)
  • Computer Bits (December 1992)
  • Computer Bits (December 1992)
  • Computer Bits (February 1993)
  • Computer Bits (February 1993)
  • Computer Bits (April 1993)
  • Computer Bits (April 1993)
  • Computer Bits (May 1993)
  • Computer Bits (May 1993)
  • Computer Bits (June 1993)
  • Computer Bits (June 1993)
  • Computer Bits (October 1993)
  • Computer Bits (October 1993)
  • Computer Bits (March 1994)
  • Computer Bits (March 1994)
  • Computer Bits (May 1994)
  • Computer Bits (May 1994)
  • Computer Bits (June 1994)
  • Computer Bits (June 1994)
  • Computer Bits (July 1994)
  • Computer Bits (July 1994)
  • Computer Bits (October 1994)
  • Computer Bits (October 1994)
  • Computer Bits (November 1994)
  • Computer Bits (November 1994)
  • Computer Bits (December 1994)
  • Computer Bits (December 1994)
  • Computer Bits (January 1995)
  • Computer Bits (January 1995)
  • Computer Bits (February 1995)
  • Computer Bits (February 1995)
  • Computer Bits (March 1995)
  • Computer Bits (March 1995)
  • Computer Bits (April 1995)
  • Computer Bits (April 1995)
  • CMOS Memory Settings - What To Do When The Battery Goes Flat (May 1995)
  • CMOS Memory Settings - What To Do When The Battery Goes Flat (May 1995)
  • Computer Bits (July 1995)
  • Computer Bits (July 1995)
  • Computer Bits (September 1995)
  • Computer Bits (September 1995)
  • Computer Bits: Connecting To The Internet With WIndows 95 (October 1995)
  • Computer Bits: Connecting To The Internet With WIndows 95 (October 1995)
  • Computer Bits (December 1995)
  • Computer Bits (December 1995)
  • Computer Bits (January 1996)
  • Computer Bits (January 1996)
  • Computer Bits (February 1996)
  • Computer Bits (February 1996)
  • Computer Bits (March 1996)
  • Computer Bits (March 1996)
  • Computer Bits (May 1996)
  • Computer Bits (May 1996)
  • Computer Bits (June 1996)
  • Computer Bits (June 1996)
  • Computer Bits (July 1996)
  • Computer Bits (July 1996)
  • Computer Bits (August 1996)
  • Computer Bits (August 1996)
  • Computer Bits (January 1997)
  • Computer Bits (January 1997)
  • Computer Bits (April 1997)
  • Computer Bits (April 1997)
  • Windows 95: The Hardware That's Required (May 1997)
  • Windows 95: The Hardware That's Required (May 1997)
  • Turning Up Your Hard Disc Drive (June 1997)
  • Turning Up Your Hard Disc Drive (June 1997)
  • Computer Bits (July 1997)
  • Computer Bits (July 1997)
  • Computer Bits: The Ins & Outs Of Sound Cards (August 1997)
  • Computer Bits: The Ins & Outs Of Sound Cards (August 1997)
  • Computer Bits (September 1997)
  • Computer Bits (September 1997)
  • Computer Bits (October 1997)
  • Computer Bits (October 1997)
  • Computer Bits (November 1997)
  • Computer Bits (November 1997)
  • Computer Bits (April 1998)
  • Computer Bits (April 1998)
  • Computer Bits (June 1998)
  • Computer Bits (June 1998)
  • Computer Bits (July 1998)
  • Computer Bits (July 1998)
  • Computer Bits (November 1998)
  • Computer Bits (November 1998)
  • Computer Bits (December 1998)
  • Computer Bits (December 1998)
  • Control Your World Using Linux (July 2011)
  • Control Your World Using Linux (July 2011)
Articles in this series:
  • Remote Control (December 1991)
  • Remote Control (December 1991)
  • Remote Control (January 1992)
  • Remote Control (January 1992)
  • Designing A Speed Controller For Electric Models (February 1992)
  • Designing A Speed Controller For Electric Models (February 1992)
  • Remote Control (March 1992)
  • Remote Control (March 1992)
CEREC is a completely new system that combines 3dimensional scanning, computer-aided design, and numerically-controlled milling to make ceramic tooth fillings. It will make it possible for dentists to produce and insert ceramic fillings in a single session. Fast ceramic fillings for teeth THE ELECTRONIC A MALGAM, epoxy resins and gold are the standard materials for fillings. Now, however, ceramic fillings are possible, thanks to the CEREC system developed by Dr Werner H. Mormann and Dr Marco Brandestini in collaboration with Siemens. The search for an alternative to traditional metal fillings has been on for about 20 years. Ten years ago, about 95% of posterior restorations (ie, fillings for back teeth) were of amalgam (gold plays a minor role in this area). Today, amalgam is only used for about 50% of restorations, with tooth-col4 SILICON CHIP oured composite resin materials being used for the other 50% . The reason for this trend may, among other things, be that amalgam has suffered from a good deal of public debate regarding health-risks. The goal since 1980 has therefore been to find tooth-coloured restoration materials for posterior teeth. Such fillings have been in use since 1958, which was when new composite resin materials were being developed in the US. However, these materials have two serious disadvantages. The first of these is that they lose surface substance due to masticatory abrasion (ie, chewing). The second problem is that they shrink during polymerization and this can mean a reduction in volume of 2-3%. That's why large composite resin fillings never make a perfect seal, even from the .very beginning. This material is therefore unsuitable for restoring pos- Top of page: this photo shows a dentist using the CEREC optical scanner to scan a patient's tooth cavity. The impression is immediately displayed on the computer monitor. terior tooth cavities and for bearing the stresses of chewing. Since 1980, it has been found that both problems - abrasion and shrinkage - can be brought under control if the filling is processed as an inlay outside the oral cavity. This inlay can then be bonded into the tooth using the same composite resin material. That was the basic discovery on which the development of the CEREC system rests. In fact, the inlay method is the basis of gold fillings too. The big disadvantage of the conventional inlay technique is that an impression must be taken which the dental technician then uses to form the inlay. The dentist has to seal the cavity and remove the temporary filling again in the next session. Only then can the gold inlay be inserted. The big advantage of amalgam and traditional composite resin fillings is that they can be completed in a single session. So that became the goal: to be able to produce a tooth-coloured inlay at the dentist's office in a single sitting. In 1980, Dr Mormann tested all the possible ways of producing such inlays using the conventional method of impression, cast and counter cast. However, because these required the dentist to function as a dental technician, it quickly became clear that an insufficient resolution. But the problem intrigued him. Shortly after, he came to the conclusion that only an optical scanning method could do the task. Their first experiment was conducted in 1982. It proved that it is possible to measure dental cavities precisely using a special video camera; that is, to take an optical impression. What evolved from this was an active triangulation method in which a striped pattern is projected onto the cavity and a recording is made from which a computer can calculate the depth of each pixel. So, the basic principle, using the inlay technique in conjunction with an optical scanning method, was taken care of. But the story didn't end there. There were a number of goals that still had to be met. For instance, the dentist should be able to use the system directly. The system should make it easy and simple to scan a cavity in just fractions of a second. The data should be immediately available, and the dentist should be able to process it directly. Finally, by using a numerically-controlled milling machine, the system should make it possible for the dentist to make inlays in just a few minutes. Developing the milling machine wasn't as easy as originally anticipated. At first, they simply enlarged and strengthened a dental drill and made it 3-dimensionally mobile using a complex motor drive system. This was not entirely successful. After that, the machine was drastically simplified, limiting it to three degrees of freedom, and utilising just one milling disc, which creates the completed inlay from a ceramic block in just a few minutes. The idea of confining the milling head to just three degrees of freedom might sound limiting but it works in most cases. Dental decay usually follows a typical pattern. This leads to certain standard types of cavity preparation for which inlays can be easily produced by the CEREC system. Preparation does not differ in prin- DENTIST improved production method would be necessary. It was then realised that the main obstacle was the lack of a cavity scanning system. Optical scanning Dr Mormann at first thought about scanning with ultrasound. He discussed this with the co-inventor of the CEREC system, Dr Brandestini, who at that time was working intensively at Advanced Technologies Laboratories Inc in Seattle, Washington, on ultrasound scanners for medial diagnostics. He explained that ultrasound would not be feasible because of its This monitor photograph shows the optical scan of a patient's tooth and the area to be restored by a ceramic inlay. Using the information gathered from the optical scan, the computer controlled milling machine manufactures a ceramic inlay to restore the tooth. It does this in only a few minutes. ciple from conventional inlay preparation. However, the machine can't work hollow parts on the inlay, Therefore, during cavity preparation, the dentist simply has to keep CEREC's design rules and operation in mind . . The tooth can then be prepared with as little loss of substance as with other methods. A dentist skilled in this method can restore the full range of inlay and onlay cavities in his surgery. Inlay cavities are always designed so that the filling can be inserted from MARCH 1992 5 I ins were not durable enough - and, although they are much improved since first introduced, they are still not as strong as ceramics. · Ceramics have a lot of advantages. They can be produced to perfectly match tooth colour and they are nonsoluble, durable and stable in the oral cavity. Although ceramics are nonelastic and can break when subjected to overload, they are in this respect no different from dental enamel. Ceramics also stand up to machineprocessing very well. Generally, because factory produced material has fewer flaws than individually fired dental porcelain, it is easier control its quality than it is with blocks produced in dental labs. Other materials Dr Werner H. Mormann, of the Dental Institute of Zurich, in Switzerland, is a co-developer of the CEREC ceramic inlay method of tooth restoration. Intended mainly to replace amalgam fillings, it is hope that the method may eventually be used for full crown restorations. one direction and so that all the cavity margins and surfaces can be seen from a viewing angle which coincides with the insertion axis of the cavity. This makes it possible to record the shape with a single scan. The idea is that if a dentist is capable of preparing a cavity in this way, he is also capable of holding a camera and man- Compared with amalgam fillings (below), the new CEREC ceramic inlay fillings (right) are virtually invisible. These fillings had been in place for two years when photographed. 6 SILICON CHIP ipulating it just like a normal examination mirror. In Switzerland, a CEREC restoration costs two to three times as much as an amalgam filling. But on the other hand, if the dentist makes an impression of the area to be restored, and sends it out to a lab so that an inlay can be made, then the total cost is five to eight times as high as an amalgam filling. So CEREC-produced fillings often offer substantial savings, and then save patients the trouble of having to come in a second time. Ceramic material Dr Mormann discovered during the development stage that composite res- In principle, composite resins are suitable provided they can be industrially manufactured in suitably sized blocks. Glass ceramics can also be used and have the advantage of having almost exactly the same degree of hardness as dental enamel. In addition, their physical properties are pretty similar to those of dental enamel. The one disadvantage of this material, namely that it was transparent, has been solved: tooth-coloured, natural-looking glass ceramics are now available. Today, CEREC can produce inlays, onlays, and veneers very simply and quickly for anterior applications. These can be used as aesthetic half crowns to restore the labial surfaces of anterior teeth. Onlays and veneers are a step in the direction of full crowns, which is the ultimate aim. Acknowledgement: our thanks to Siemens Ltd for photos and permission to reproduce material from Siemens Review, Volume 57, March/April 1990. SC